Republicans in the House have been talking about balancing the budget. Since budget season kicks off this week, @aliciaparlap@jshkatz and I took a look at what that would take. https://t.co/6tOQNcYeiI
First of all, balancing the budget in a decade would be hard. It would involve reducing spending and/or raising revenue by $16 trillion. That's around a quarter of federal spending. pic.twitter.com/MsZeDJSxga
What about balancing the budget without cutting Medicare or Social Security? Republicans booed at the SOTU when the president said they wanted to touch those programs. https://t.co/6tOQNcYeiIpic.twitter.com/Ue3OhvcZAm
Here's what @MarcGoldwein had to say about that math: “It’s incredibly difficult to balance the budget within 10 years. It goes from being incredibly difficult to practically impossible if you start taking things off the table.” https://t.co/6tOQNcYeiI
If you look at our charts, you can see why. Social Security and Medicare are where the money is. If you avoid cutting them--or defense--there's not much left.
You could also raise taxes to balance the budget. This is not an option much talked about in Washington, but we looked at some options from the @USCBO to give a sense of what might be involved. pic.twitter.com/V3ivemP39r
Ok, but is balancing the federal budget the right goal? Some people think so, but the mainstream view of economists is that balance is not necessary as long as federal debt is stable relative to the size of the economy.
One last point: It's not just "woke" programs. The size of the deficit is large enough that it is basically impossible to balance the budget in a decade by just cutting your least favorite line item or reversing your least favorite tax cut.
CBO is out with its own analysis of what it would take the balance the budget. If the Trump tax cuts are renewed, and cuts to Medicare, Social Security, Veterans, and Defense are off the table, zeroing out the rest of the budget still wouldn't be enough. https://t.co/qJwDhCutclpic.twitter.com/Kkq3NcXKJy
This analysis differs by the one in our article in two main ways. 1) It takes veteran's benefits off the table. 2) It assumes the Trump tax cuts will be renewed. Our numbers assumed the tax cuts would expire after a decade.
It's impossible to list everything that would be eliminated in this scenario via tweet, but a few examples are: The FBI, farm subsidies, the State Department, air traffic controllers, the EPA, food assistance, medical research funding, border patrol, the judiciary...
Comments
by artappraiser on Tue, 03/14/2023 - 4:47pm