Sanders said he wouldn't support the bipartisan infrastructure bill if it included measures such as raising the gas tax or a fee on electric vehicles, demonstrating that Democrats are at risk of losing progressives' support in a 50-50 Senate https://t.co/dXITbLTrXy
Sen. Lindsey Graham encouraged President Joe Biden to support his bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure proposal but said it could be jeopardized if Democrats signal that they intend to follow it up with their own package via reconciliation https://t.co/geqOyD7W0u
If one of the leading progressive advocacy groups has a message that Biden just needs to Try Harder when there's no evidence that this would actually work—and the swing vote is in a Trump +39 state—then maybe progressives need better advocacy groups. https://t.co/AqperJCz5j
(To be clear, this was not a critique of Adam or his organization in any way; rather, it was intended as a critique of the Indivisible tweet he was citing.)
In today's (free!) Slow Boring post, @mattyglesias and I explain the "Secret Congress" theory, and explore its implications for progressives trying to make policy change. https://t.co/GhOcV7QbJq
primary electorates say they'd rather have members that fight the other party than help their own state
Strikes me real hard as one thing that really drives me nuts going way back, being a common sentiment among "progressives" on all the online groups I ever have participated on. It's stupid and wrong use of partisanship. It's not offering an alternative to right wing games, it's copying them. And everyone who works in Congress knows it; most just chose not to say. They've got to pretend to "fight" to please the idiots in their primary electorate. Most don't really "fight", they just do talking points that pretend they do. Some are better at it than others, but it's all fake and has nothing to do with most bills passed by Congress. Hearings might be done for that purpose, but they are not bills, and usually have little to do with the reality of bills enacted that change people's lives, all sound and fury signifying nothing. Meanwhile pork sausage gets made behind the backs of the primary electorate, lobbyists of all kinds aren't that stupid.
this is a surprising announcement, a weird choice of area and demographic and they are not saying much about it yet, the article basically says nothing cause the White House has given no details:
The tentative bipartisan framework reached among senators tonight calls for $559B in new spending (down from $579B because of new decision to repurpose $20B in previously appropriated broadband funds).
Like children wanting a daddie to make it all better; like they were promised a rose garden and wouldn't have to work. When some of the buzzwords in their very own campaigns are responsible for losing seats elsewhere for Dems in the House! Personally I'd like to see less dumping on Manchin, at least he works on trying to make deals! I don't get what they don't get about this not being a progressive country! Many other countries that were once more progressive are going more conservative. Hello, reality. Why not stay in local politics if there were majority of friendlies there in your district. In DC, this is a grownup making sausage place. The Republicans won't play fair, waaaaah.
We’ve struck a deal. A group of senators – five Democrats and five Republicans – has come together and forged an infrastructure agreement that will create millions of American jobs.
Kabuki shows in spades. The first four here are all at The Hill right now. Then there's the Utah Gov's retweet of Mitt's tweet. What did that Geo. Packer article say? Four parts? Is like quadrapatisanship?
Democratic leaders are trying to assure nervous progressives that their priorities for climate change, paid family leave and other “human infrastructure” can still be delivered even with President Biden embracing a much more narrowly focused Senate infrastructure deal.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) made clear Thursday that the House won’t vote on any bipartisan infrastructure deal until the Senate also passes a larger package with Democratic priorities through the budget reconciliation process that can evade a GOP filibuster.
It was a move by Pelosi intended to calm the unrest among liberals, and it sent a strong signal to the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue as well [.....]
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday afternoon slammed President Biden for “caving” to his left flank after the president endorsed a bipartisan $579 billion, five-year infrastructure framework and then threatened to veto it if it’s not accompanied by a much larger reconciliation package.
“Less than two hours after publicly commending our colleagues and actually endorsing the bipartisan agreement, the president took the extraordinary step of threatening to veto it. It was a tale of two press conferences,” McConnell said on the floor.
McConnell’s criticism is the latest sign that the Democratic strategy of trying to pass Biden’s infrastructure on two tracks consisting of a scaled-down bipartisan package and a larger partisan reconciliation package will be difficult to pull off [....]
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said on Thursday that it was "inevitable" that Democrats would move forward with a separate, Democrat-only infrastructure package — it was just a question of what the size and scope will be.
"Reconciliation is inevitable because basically Republicans I understand on the tax they don't want to undo anything on the 2017 [bill]. For those who didn't vote for 2017, there should be some adjustments. I'm open to that," Manchin told reporters.
Manchin's remarks are a huge boon for Democrats because the party needs all 50 of its members to support reconciliation — the budget process that lets them bypass the 60-vote legislative filibuster [....]
President Biden on Thursday said he won’t sign the bipartisan infrastructure deal if Congress doesn’t also pass a reconciliation bill, committing to a dual track system to get both bills passed.
“I expect that in the coming months this summer, before the fiscal year is over, that we will have voted on this bill, the infrastructure bill, as well as voted on the budget resolution. But if only one comes to me, this is the only one that comes to me, I’m not signing it. It’s in tandem,” Biden told reporters at the White House.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that the House would not vote on a bipartisan infrastructure bill until the Senate passes a larger set of Democratic priorities through budget reconciliation.
Biden said he agreed with the Speaker on the sequencing [....]
We appreciate @SenatorRomney's work on an infrastructure bill that includes funding for roads, broadband, and water storage projects.
Utah will need all of it and more to stay ahead of our explosive growth. We'll watch for details, but we’re encouraged to see the progress. https://t.co/IAw5oDwGDQ
Kinda has a point though - albeit a year ago it was all white dudes and Ivanka. Still, if you're coordinating initiatives that includes supports for "underserved" minorities, it might make sense to have some minority representation. Of course there are questions about which committees are involved, which senators represent key constituencies to pass this legislation, etc, so it might not line up. Basically it'd have to be 1 of 5 D m Senators)
Comments
by artappraiser on Sun, 06/20/2021 - 8:47pm
oh pretty please
by artappraiser on Sun, 06/20/2021 - 9:27pm
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/21/2021 - 8:58am
"The White House" is liking Manchin's plan for voting rights as well:
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/21/2021 - 11:10am
Nate Silver on voting reform bill:
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/21/2021 - 8:32pm
Green Lanternism explained
https://www.vox.com/2014/5/20/5732208/the-green-lantern-theory-of-the-pr...
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 06/22/2021 - 1:24am
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/21/2021 - 9:09am
this:
Strikes me real hard as one thing that really drives me nuts going way back, being a common sentiment among "progressives" on all the online groups I ever have participated on. It's stupid and wrong use of partisanship. It's not offering an alternative to right wing games, it's copying them. And everyone who works in Congress knows it; most just chose not to say. They've got to pretend to "fight" to please the idiots in their primary electorate. Most don't really "fight", they just do talking points that pretend they do. Some are better at it than others, but it's all fake and has nothing to do with most bills passed by Congress. Hearings might be done for that purpose, but they are not bills, and usually have little to do with the reality of bills enacted that change people's lives, all sound and fury signifying nothing. Meanwhile pork sausage gets made behind the backs of the primary electorate, lobbyists of all kinds aren't that stupid.
by artappraiser on Mon, 06/21/2021 - 9:28am
this is a surprising announcement, a weird choice of area and demographic and they are not saying much about it yet, the article basically says nothing cause the White House has given no details:
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/22/2021 - 1:44pm
extra weird is that when I went back to Twitter, first thing I saw was this retweeted:
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/22/2021 - 1:51pm
scrolling thru the thread, it has lots of interesting comments, like this:
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/22/2021 - 1:57pm
Biden's a Zappa fan - Choose Cheese!
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 06/22/2021 - 3:14pm
^ that was 10 hrs. ago. 3 hrs. ago >
now >
by artappraiser on Wed, 06/23/2021 - 9:30pm
Politico implies Green Lanterism or a variant is a growing problem among progressives in Congress:
Like children wanting a daddie to make it all better; like they were promised a rose garden and wouldn't have to work. When some of the buzzwords in their very own campaigns are responsible for losing seats elsewhere for Dems in the House! Personally I'd like to see less dumping on Manchin, at least he works on trying to make deals! I don't get what they don't get about this not being a progressive country! Many other countries that were once more progressive are going more conservative. Hello, reality. Why not stay in local politics if there were majority of friendlies there in your district. In DC, this is a grownup making sausage place. The Republicans won't play fair, waaaaah.
by artappraiser on Wed, 06/23/2021 - 10:02pm
op-ed published by Fox News:
by artappraiser on Wed, 06/23/2021 - 11:50pm
the President declares:
I think it's important to note that it's a declarative statement.
He's standing behind the bipartisan group as representing the real power in Congress.
If it's derailed by others they will be painted as the radical obstructionists.
by artappraiser on Thu, 06/24/2021 - 1:33pm
Kabuki shows in spades. The first four here are all at The Hill right now. Then there's the Utah Gov's retweet of Mitt's tweet. What did that Geo. Packer article say? Four parts? Is like quadrapatisanship?
Democrats seek to calm nervous left
BY CRISTINA MARCOS - 06/24/21 05:57 PM EDT
McConnell slams Biden for already 'caving' to left on infrastructure deal
BY ALEXANDER BOLTON - 06/24/21 05:40 PM EDT
Manchin says Democratic-only infrastructure bill 'inevitable'
BY JORDAIN CARNEY - 06/24/21 03:30 PM EDT
Biden says he won't sign bipartisan bill without reconciliation bill
BY ALEX GANGITANO AND MORGAN CHALFANT - 06/24/21 03:01 PM EDT
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/25/2021 - 1:37am
oh boy, can't leave this take out, also at The Hill
Ocasio-Cortez criticizes bipartisan infrastructure deal for lack of diversity among negotiators
BY MYCHAEL SCHNELL 9H AGO
by artappraiser on Fri, 06/25/2021 - 1:41am
Kinda has a point though - albeit a year ago it was all white dudes and Ivanka. Still, if you're coordinating initiatives that includes supports for "underserved" minorities, it might make sense to have some minority representation. Of course there are questions about which committees are involved, which senators represent key constituencies to pass this legislation, etc, so it might not line up. Basically it'd have to be 1 of 5 D m Senators)
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 06/25/2021 - 2:14am