MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Mike Baker, Associated Press, earlier today: "...The numbers suggest that the legitimate votes rejected by the laws are far more numerous than are the cases of fraud that advocates of the rules say they are trying to prevent."
No surprise to anyone here.
......
Edward Weidenbener, a World War II veteran who had voted for Mitt Romney in the Republican presidential contest, said he was surprised by the rules and the consequences.
"A lot of people don't have a photo ID. They'll be automatically disenfranchised," he said.
As more states put in place strict voter ID rules, an AP review of temporary ballots from Indiana and Georgia, which first adopted the most stringent standards, found that more than 1,200 such votes were tossed during the 2008 general election.
During sparsely attended primaries this year in Georgia, Indiana and Tennessee, the states implementing the toughest laws, hundreds more ballots were blocked.
The numbers suggest that the legitimate votes rejected by the laws are far more numerous than are the cases of fraud that advocates of the rules say they are trying to prevent. Thousands more votes could be in jeopardy for this November, when more states with larger populations are looking to have similar rules in place.
More than two dozen states have some form of ID requirement, and 11 of those passed new rules over the past two years largely at the urging of Republicans who say they want to prevent fraud.
Comments
No surprise to anyone here
Not necessarily; matter of fact, see this post from a few months ago, (be sure you scroll down and check out the the proposal part)
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 4:00pm
In Georgia it's not just new voting laws, as of July1, simply renewing a driver's license or photo id got way harder. Of course, it was ridiculously easy before. Not sure how Georgia compares with other states' requirements.
by EmmaZahn on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 7:35pm