He's going with the loser thing big time! Go ahead impeach me! Heroic victimhood at the hands of a cruel majority continues for now, winning later.
In case Trump's effort to use the symbolism of the Alamo as a rallying cry (at taxpayer expense) is lost on anyone, the actual town of Alamo is also next to where the Confederacy made its last stand in the Civil War -- the Battle of Palmito Hill. https://t.co/iDYSxgaXW8https://t.co/FBGJ03y6uX
I am reminded of how the Nov. vote went against Dems' expectations along the southern Texas border, including the "GOTV of Hispanics" thing sorta backfiring. I am betting some still sympathetic campaign operative thought this up for him and he liked it.
1. I think that the ban of Donald Trump on Twitter is an unacceptable act of censorship (THREAD)
2. Of course, during his time in the office, Trump has been writing and saying very irresponsible things. And paid for it by not getting re-elected for a second term.
3. The election is a straightforward and competitive process. You can participate in it, you can appeal against the results, they're being monitored by millions of people. The ban on Twitter is a decision of people we don't know in accordance with a procedure we don't know.
4. In my opinion, the decision to ban Trump was based on emotions and personal political preferences.
5. Don't tell me he was banned for violating Twitter rules. I get death threats here every day for many years, and Twitter doesn't ban anyone (not that I ask for it).
6. Among the people who have Twitter accounts are cold-blooded murderers (Putin or Maduro) and liars and thieves (Medvedev). For many years, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram have been used as a base for Putin's "troll factory" and similar groups from other authoritarian countries
7. Those who denied COVID-19 exist freely and communicate on Twitter. Their words have cost thousands of lives. And yet, it was Trump who got banned publicly and ostentatiously. Such selectivity indicates that this was an act of censorship.
8. Of course, Twitter is a private company, but we have seen many examples in Russian and China of such private companies becoming the state's best friends and the enablers when it comes to censorship.
9. If you replace "Trump" with "Navalny" in today's discussion, you will get an 80% accurate Kremlin's answer as to why my name can't be mentioned on Russian TV and I shouldn't be allowed to participate in any elections.
10. This precedent will be exploited by the enemies of freedom of speech around the world. In Russia as well. Every time when they need to silence someone, they will say: 'this is just common practice, even Trump got blocked on Twitter'.
11. If @Twitter and @jack want to do things right, they need to create some sort of a committee that can make such decisions. We need to know the names of the members of this committee, understand how it works, how its members vote and how we can appeal against their decisions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
1. Я считаю, что бан президента Трампа в твиттере - это неприемлемый акт цензуры. Тред.
2. Да, Трамп, находясь на своей позиции, говорил и писал безответственные вещи. За это он расплатился тем, что его не избрали на второй срок.
3. Выборы - понятная и конкурентная процедура. Вы можете в них участвовать, вы можете обжаловать их результаты, за их ходом наблюдают миллионы людей. Бан в твиттере - решение неизвестных нам людей по неизвестной процедуре.
Ко мне в твиттер несколько раз прислали ссылку на видео Максима Каца "Вызываю Навального на дебаты". Я его посмотрел и вот окончательный тред на эту тему.
Я с пониманием отношусь к тому, что Максим @max_katz раскручивает свой канал и ему хочется устроить дебаты со мной. Как говорится, хочешь несколько миллионов просмотров, устраивай дебаты с Навальным.
Я действительно часто участвую в дебатах. А ещё гораздо чаще меня вызывают на них. Увы, в большинстве случаев ровно с такими целями - продвижение, раскрутка, лайки, всё такие. Так работает политика, так работают медиа, так и должно быть
Only 6 days into 2020 and I am ready to announce 'disappointment of the year' award. And it goes to the @FinancialTimes. One of the most respectable newspapers in the world published a cringingly servile interview with an international mafia boss Usmanov. Spoiler: they loved him.
@FinancialTimes I don't even know where to start. Usmanov simply repeated all the lies about the origin of his wealth, about how he is not an oligarch (what?),and how he has never privatised any state assets. In 2017 we spent a long time looking into this and debunked every single claim he makes
@FinancialTimes We provided documents from the UK official registers proving that Usmanov's money come from a huge scam that he ran using a UK company he secretly owned in the 90s. Does a British newspaper have any interest in that? No. Let's do more vodka shots instead!
oh I was just coming here to say I am seeing more big picture discussion starting in on it, see you are on it too. I had only had this:
This is why rebuilding journalism is so important: “America will not survive the big lie just because a liar is separated from power. It will need a thoughtful repluralization of media and a commitment to facts as a public good.” https://t.co/wSWtKjzMGS
Davy Crockett stops shooting at Mexicans in order to reload. He notices Donald J Trump crouching next to him to keep out of the line of fire. Crockett calls out: "Hey there buddy. I like your hat."
A friend told me one of the first rules of being homeless - always have a hat. Like for when you need to wipe your ass. All these slightly brown MAGA hats from people shitting themselves (literally and figurative). But I'm pretty sure they weren't supposed to put the hat back on.
looks like the brand is also gonna be "victim of Antifa" (Axios scoop):
"McCarthy would have none of it, telling the president: 'It's not Antifa, it's MAGA. I know. I was there,' according to a White House official and another source familiar with the call." Wow. https://t.co/aUti4iAVEd
One question I haven't seen answered is if McCarthy is whipping his caucus on Trump's behalf—trying to convince members to vote against impeachment—or letting them vote their conscience. That Trump is fully deranged is confirmed by him alienating McCarthy. https://t.co/XEsw4qjD2U
jeezus h. christ, no other words come to mind except "clueless":
Ivanka plans to attend Biden's inauguration to save political career
"Ivanka is worried that her promising political career is in jeopardy and she's doing whatever she can to save her reputation"
Comments
Is anyone gonna dare to remind him he's 74 years old?
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/10/2021 - 2:10pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/10/2021 - 3:40pm
I am reminded of how the Nov. vote went against Dems' expectations along the southern Texas border, including the "GOTV of Hispanics" thing sorta backfiring. I am betting some still sympathetic campaign operative thought this up for him and he liked it.
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/10/2021 - 3:44pm
Navalny on deplatforming Trump
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 01/10/2021 - 4:13pm
oh I was just coming here to say I am seeing more big picture discussion starting in on it, see you are on it too. I had only had this:
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/10/2021 - 4:24pm
Davy Crockett stops shooting at Mexicans in order to reload. He notices Donald J Trump crouching next to him to keep out of the line of fire. Crockett calls out: "Hey there buddy. I like your hat."
by moat on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 9:21am
A friend told me one of the first rules of being homeless - always have a hat. Like for when you need to wipe your ass. All these slightly brown MAGA hats from people shitting themselves (literally and figurative). But I'm pretty sure they weren't supposed to put the hat back on.
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 9:30am
looks like the brand is also gonna be "victim of Antifa" (Axios scoop):
by artappraiser on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 10:59pm
alienating McCarthy, a mark of true derangment?
by artappraiser on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 11:39pm
jeezus h. christ, no other words come to mind except "clueless":
by artappraiser on Mon, 01/11/2021 - 11:05pm
As Schumer said to McConnell the other day: "Isn't it a little late for that?"
by moat on Tue, 01/12/2021 - 8:52am