MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Associated Press, Jan. 6, 2012
A US navy destroyer has rescued an Iranian fishing boat that had been commandeered by suspected pirates just days after Tehran warned America to keep its warships out of the Gulf.
US forces flying off the guided-missile destroyer USS Kidd responded to a distress call from the Iranian vessel, the Al Molai, which had been held captive for more than 40 days, the US navy said Friday. The Kidd was sailing in the Arabian sea, after leaving the Gulf, when it came to the sailors' aid.
A US navy team boarded the ship Thursday and detained 15 suspected Somali pirates. They had been holding the 13-member Iranian crew hostage and were using the boat as a "mother ship" for pirating operations in the Gulf.
Amid escalating tensions with Tehran, the Obama administration reveled in delivering the news [....]
Comments
with short US Navy video taken from the air:
Also see:
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 3:08am
The cynic in me expects Iran to say that it was all a puppet show; that we're supporting the pirates, or something like that.
by Verified Atheist on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 7:09am
One thing I learned checking out the Iran state news site IRNA from time to time over the years is that one can never underestimate the bizarreness and creativity of the propaganda that the Iranian government will try to spin on current events....
Edit to add: but right now this appears to be the only thing they can come up with, at least as far as the English version of their site goes:
http://www.irna.ir/ENNewsShow.aspx?NID=30753403&SRCH=1
The US forces did something humanitarian; I surmise they like to encourage that in evil empires, and they would also like to point out that they do the same all the time....
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 4:26pm
Hmm, when exactly was the distress call made?
Did a crew member manage to escape the captors for long enough to make one? Or was the distress call made at the time of the capture?
If at the time of capture, did the US Navy respond immediately and just take some time to get there? Did they wait for some sort of backchannel thumbs up from the Iranians? Did they have to search for the boat? Or did they wait for a good day for a heroic rescue?
The guardian is usually pretty good at providing enough detail that a reader can figure out the story, but not this time....
by erica20 on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 3:31pm
The guardian is usually
It's not a Guardian story, it's an AP story at their website. But yeah, I was hoping to more development of this wire story, too, that's why I went and looked for other links. It's too soon after breaking, I guess, but I hope someone does some follow up.
Like you I have some suspicions. On the one hand, if the Pentagon really planned a PR coup with this thing, wouldn't they have made sure more media knew more about it beforehand, on the other hand, in this situation they also had to worry about if it went FUBAR....
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 4:10pm
Bad on me for opining about lack of coverage on something without first even glancing at the front page of my dead-tree version of the New York Times:
C.J. Chivers,
reporting from ABOARD THE FISHING VESSEL AL MULAHI, in the Gulf of Yemen, yesterday:
For Iranians Waylaid by Pirates, U.S. to the Rescue
I haven't read the whole thing yet, and haven't a clue how he got on the ship yesterday (i.e., was he "embedded" with a Navy op from its start?) But I will say that I have the highest respect for him as a reporter, I truly think he is one of our best.
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 5:25pm
More follow up/details,still filing from the freed ship:
by artappraiser on Mon, 01/09/2012 - 2:24am
I don't recall where I heard it but apparently a different ship was being approached/attacked by pirates and put out a distress message saying so. The navy responded, chased off the pirates, and followed them to the pirates' mother ship which they boarded and where they found the Iranians.
The Navy did not choose to take a risk even though the captives were Iranian, they discovered them and found that they were Iranians in the course of doing what they should have done. They then treated the Iranian fishermen as they should have been treated [After checking them for horns and cloven feet] and Iran responded with an expression of gratitude that the U.S. Navy had done what the military of any country should do.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 6:03pm
Yes, you have it correct--
Related Chivers' narrative from The Times link above:
Thing is, while the Admiral said "dumbest pirates ever," sounds like Chivers is suggesting it was quite smart of them to chose a ship under the Iranian flag as their hostage/base, as less chance others would mess with them
The rest of the story is quite interesting (on page 2 of the article,) includes things like tricking some of the captured pirates into thinking they were letting them go
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/07/2012 - 9:18pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 11:09pm
by artappraiser on Thu, 05/24/2012 - 11:50pm