Schumer: "Mr. Barr must commit ... to two important things: First, that the Special Counsel’s investigation will proceed unimpeded, and second, that the Special Counsel’s final report will be made available to Congress and the public immediately upon completion."
When I read stuff like this, I am unfortunately reminded how allowing JFK to appoint RFK as his attorney general is such a bad precedent, will always be used as a "both sides do it" point of argument.
Where does one draw the line in the spectrum from past business or political relationships to friendlies and relatives?
Similar but different because a policy advocacy situation is not the same as a legal appt. :Bill Clinton having Hillary do the Health Care tax force got us Jvanka involved in policy making appts. without that much outrage.
A long-time friend of Bill Barr’s told @Isikoff and me that Barr rebuffed numerous feelers from the White House to be Attorney General in large part because he didn’t want to be attacked on twitter by @realDonaldTrump. Something changes his mind. https://t.co/86HXuZNv8g
By Benjamin Wittes Editor in chief of Lawfare and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, @ TheAtlantic.com, Dec. 9
William Barr’s statements raise serious questions, but he appears far more qualified than the other candidates Trump reportedly considered for the post.
By Martin Matishak @ Politico.com, 12/09/2018 11:44 AM EST
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Sunday said he hasn't decided whether to support President Donald Trump's pick to be the next attorney general because of concerns about privacy issues.
Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Paul said he's concerned that William Barr, who was attorney general from 1991 to 1993, "has been a big supporter of the PATRIOT Act, which lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to say the PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we should go much further."
He also alleged that Barr is a "big fan" of seizing people’s property through civil asset forfeiture.
"I haven't made a decision about him, but I can‘t tell you — the first things I've learned about him being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling," Paul said [....]
Comments
by artappraiser on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 6:08pm
Lawfare's/Harvard Law's Jack Goldsmith comments in a 6-tweet thread.
by artappraiser on Thu, 12/06/2018 - 7:36pm
Note that he wants us all to be able see a report, first time I've seen that demand.
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/07/2018 - 2:08pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 12/07/2018 - 2:26pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 10:52am
When I read stuff like this, I am unfortunately reminded how allowing JFK to appoint RFK as his attorney general is such a bad precedent, will always be used as a "both sides do it" point of argument.
Where does one draw the line in the spectrum from past business or political relationships to friendlies and relatives?
Similar but different because a policy advocacy situation is not the same as a legal appt. :Bill Clinton having Hillary do the Health Care tax force got us Jvanka involved in policy making appts. without that much outrage.
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 11:05am
by artappraiser on Mon, 12/10/2018 - 2:35am
As Good an Attorney General as We’re Likely to Get
By Benjamin Wittes Editor in chief of Lawfare and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, @ TheAtlantic.com, Dec. 9
William Barr’s statements raise serious questions, but he appears far more qualified than the other candidates Trump reportedly considered for the post.
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 8:04pm
Rand Paul ‘disturbed’ by attorney general nominee’s views
By Martin Matishak @ Politico.com, 12/09/2018 11:44 AM EST
by artappraiser on Sun, 12/09/2018 - 9:44pm