Some choice bits from this article. First is this primer on how the whole thing works. pic.twitter.com/FVeHypptQl

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021

Also, here's an interesting suggestion, from another low-income developer, which is that instead of using federal housing funds to run ballot campaigns and employ SF's endless well of consultants that money might instead be used to improve low-income units or lower the rents. pic.twitter.com/wyW5Z0tyjk

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021

Oh wow, look at this. Some people think it's a little untoward for the head of an affordable housing nonprofit to live rent free in one of of his org's low-income buildings, in particular since anyone else making $200,000 would not qualify. pic.twitter.com/mAays3EOOx

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021

Mr. Eberling defended the move. After all, it "was empty before he moved in." pic.twitter.com/UqpABJGDJ7

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021

Still, other raise questions about the ethics of an affordable housing advocate who makes $200K (funded by federal low-income housing funds) living in a low-income unit (funded by federal low-income housing funds), for free. pic.twitter.com/xhAquWUoAK

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021

This seems true. pic.twitter.com/qcr5PeeEt1

— Conor Dougherty (@ConorDougherty) November 18, 2021