MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
The Obama campaign's talking points about the debate refusal are that the debates are twisted thru the media's filters.
So, why doesn't Clinton (or Obama) propose a NO-MEDIATOR DEBATE, where they question each other?
I think this would be great for BOTH of them AND for the DEMOCRATS. I don't think either would have an advantage over the other, and I think it would show them both to be substantive. (Seems unlikely that either would go negative.)