That's right, like reality, they have a well-known bias. Or maybe like in particle physics, they have right or left spin.
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
That's right, like reality, they have a well-known bias. Or maybe like in particle physics, they have right or left spin.
"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her senior aides did not comply with the State Department’s record-keeping policies, an internal watchdog determined in a report sent to Capitol Hill on Wednesday."
They all get the same answer. Plus, it's a well-written piece:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-north-patterson/clinton-versus-tru...
She's certainly nicer than me. I would have told him to eff off.
Uh, yes and no. (meaning "needs tweaking"). Read the whole thing.
A group of U.S. intelligence veterans is calling on President Obama to expedite the FBI review of former Secretary of State Clinton’s alleged email security violations so the public can assess this issue in a timely fashion.
Evidently Bernie is calling Democrats and letting them know that he does intend to keep Donald out of the White House. It sounds credible, but I wish his actions showed the same promise. I am sure that it is very hard to stop the crowds and adulation. I get that. But it wouldn't hurt for the leader of this movement to nicely and kindly let his supporters know that they need to behave. Still, I am cautiously optimistic
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-20/sanders-defiant-on...
The bursting of the tech bubble in 2000, and the subsequent recession, revealed that the 1990s boom was, at least to some degree, a mirage, the result of cheap money and, in then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s famous phrase, “irrational exuberance.” The recession that followed the tech bust, however, was relatively mild. If that were the worst consequence of the Clinton era, it might seem a small price to pay for a decade of solid growth.
But the Clinton boom, and even some specific Clinton policies, also helped sow the seeds for the far more severe Great Recession of the late 2000s.
Le jour de gloire est arrivé ! The day of glory has arrived again, in spades, as it does every summer in France. Strikes, strikes, strikes. Demonstrations, marches. Due to change in labor laws on transport workers.
Airport strikes and flight cancelations, 3 unions going out, RER nd SNCF train strikes cancelations planned a couple days a week (at a minimum) until at least July, police under siege and demonstrating for 'respect'...
Anyone going to France, be sure you can afford a car, and are ready to use GPS for navigation.
"'The problem is us' in the sense that liberalism is dominated by a certain class outlook and that I am part of that class. I am calling on other members of that class to look in the mirror and understand who they are -- that they are just as much products of their economic position as are the blue-collar workers they so hate. In particular, I am calling on them to understand that they aren't the fine and virtuous people they believe they are. That it is because of them that inequality is out of control, that Wall Street is wrecking the world, that middle-class America is falling apart. And that they have an obligation to do something about it."
Can't win for losing. Goes along with white open carry vs. black open carry.
And this year, Warren could be rising in power just as a leadership vacuum is opening among Senate Democrats—and particularly those progressive populists. Reid is retiring, and his expected successor, Chuck Schumer of New York, is considered suspect due to his friendly relationship with Wall Street. Also retiring are two of the leading women of the Democratic Caucus: Barbara Mikulski of Maryland and Barbara Boxer of California. Warren’s only real rival in terms of national following would be Sanders, whose historic presidential run has built a loyal following outside of Washington. But, as Barney Frank has made abundantly clear in recent public tirades, Sanders’ progressive Capitol colleagues have always looked at him as a party of one, not a leader or even a team player. He became a Democrat only last year, and has publicly conceded that he did so only for self-interest; he continues to list himself as an Independent for Senate business. And Sanders isn’t doing himself any favors with them by criticizing what he calls a “rigged” nominating system of superdelegates—which includes all Democratic senators. His failure to help raise money for down-ballot Democrats hasn’t helped either.
Warren’s most powerful appeal is simply this: She’s the voice of the party. […]
One reason public restrooms provoke such strong reactions: They’re hotbeds of anxiety already. They’re places where private behavior becomes shared, where taboo subjects cannot be escaped, where intimate body parts are exposed. We’re taught from an early age that excretion should be secret, spoken of euphemistically, if at all. we are violating something we learned early and deeply. Of course we feel awkward, embarrassed or vulnerable. To understand how deeply that anxiety runs, look at how many people are unable to even use public bathrooms. A surprisingly large proportion of us — as high as 15 percent, according to some studies — suffer an aversion to public urination or defecation. For some, it’s so bad that sufferers remain housebound; others carefully plan their days around their excretory schedule.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-federal-reserve-plan...
Interesting stuff.
Like it or not, here it is,
https://thevoidist.com/the-1996-article-every-millennial-should-read-d93...
THE Oregon Shakespeare Festival has decided that Shakespeare’s language is too difficult for today’s audiences to understand. It recently announced that over the next three years, it will commission 36 playwrights to translate all of Shakespeare’s plays into modern English.
The article goes on to bemoan this, claiming that it doesn't matter if the audience doesn't understand the English. I'm curious about Doctor Cleveland's opinion.
Good strong article. The author sees bigger differences between corporate dems and corporate cons than I do but I agree completely with his conclusion.