Richard Day's picture

    BLUE BLOODS; A CRITIQUE!

    A Family Gathering at Suppertime

    I have no artistic propensity.

    Do you know that in the first grade, while the other kids were drawing things the teacher just gave me a picture of a bus to trace?

    And I had no idea what trace meant so I kind of drew this circular line around the bus and the teacher just looked at it, looked at me and said:

    Can't you even trace a bus?

    I was humiliated.

    But then again, for the next 5 or 6 decades I have been continually humiliated.

    And to this day I still cannot get over it!

    I love films.

    I love some TV dramas.

    You ever taste something that you are sure you should not like and you absolutely love it anyway?

    No, I am not speaking of the mental dalliances that some have for young women in braces.

    I love Blue_Bloods

    Damn.

    I mean Tom Selleck, no Brando for sure, just scowls during his ten minutes on CBS every week.

    He reminds me of Tom Friedman except I am so sure that Friedman copied his feigned scowl from Selleck.

    Thomas L. Friedman

     

    Tom is the titular star. (Selleck you idiots not the St. Louis Park Loser for chrissakes)

    What is hilarious is that his Dad was also a NYC police commissioner and the actor playing him is about six years older than Selleck with false teeth! (Remember when Carson ended up with false teeth and he kind of lisped?)

    Donnie Wahlberg plays the son of the son (and he is some top homicide detective) and my problem is: who does not love Wahlberg? I mean I am an Irish Catholic mutt and so is Wahlberg (the white hip hop artist along with his younger brother who is paid more than God to perform his works)

    And of course both the Wahlberg brothers are born again. As if we do not have enough Irish mutts being born regularly—I mean do we really need them to be born twice? Do condoms mean nothing?

    Any way the damn family goes by the name Reagan!

    President Reagan also was an Irish mutt but his bloodlines can be traced to the side of Truth, Justice and the Northern Ireland Protestant version of the American Way.

    So..............

    The Police Commissioner is the son of a Police Commissioner and two other Reagans are police in the department run by Reagan and the most important female NYC DA is a Reagan divorced from some bad person--I would surmise anyway.

    Okay so just the family patriarchal name of Reagan should have sent me to Glee or Why I Swapped Wives in My Pig Hunting Contest or Look At the Ax On That One?

    Well, needless to say there are no transvestites or lesbians or food stamp recipients or closet commies or Wall Street Magnets or progressives (for that matter)  in this family!

    But everyone of these shows contain scenes involving at least one of the Reagan clan (why in the frick they could not be Carters but then again I get pissed when TEEVO or whatever the frick you call him falls upon his knees to thank Christ for beheading some defensive back or when some arsehole at the PGA wins a tournament and thanks Jesus H. Christ for his magnificent victory --that depended upon some drop in from the sand--or when....oh forget it!)

    Well one of the tricks used in this drama is that every single episode contains a scene where the entire three generations (or what is left of them—left not indicating some political faction) share bread and turkey and chicken and vegetables and treats! And they pray prior to digging into the eats.

    And Wahlberg has the perfect wife with two young boys and the divorcee has this delightful teenager with braces.

    It is wonderful to behold. Really, no snark intended.

    And after all, unlike Ronnie, these Reagans are all Roman Catholic. (Okay I am looking for loopholes you arseholes!)

    When you think about it there were never more republican messaged films than those from Tarantino or Scorsese or a host of other violently oriented films!

    I mean what the hell did Reservoir Dogs or Taxi Driver ever do for the message of the left?

    Anyway there are political considerations involved in Blue Bloods.

    Everyone knows in the Homicide Unit not to screw with Reagan. I mean he is the son of the Police Commissioner for chrissakes.

    And it is difficult to see where the Reagan ADA cannot help from leaning over backwards for the good of her Daddy's government sponsored street gang?

    And who is going to pop or even justly tease the young rookie in the showers (with a Harvard Law Degree—WHAT?) when that young Reagan screws up?

    And what political pundit in NYC is not going to fish out every single conflict of interest when it arises?

    But TV has a lot to do with Fairyland just like repub presidential debates for chrissakes (or any interview of a repub on FOX by Hannity)!

    The youngest Reagan cop ends up going undercover—like the entire family would not be presented constantly on the NYC tabloids weekly.

    Like the local Mafioso would not have one member who would take one look at mole and say:

    HEY, I HAVE SEEN THIS GUY BEFORE!

    Donnie is pretty good in his role. He has a partner who could make tons of tips at some local Hooter's but the couple kind of works as a team and any sexual innuendo is kept to a minimum.

    As I wrote before the best police drama on TV today is Southland!

    But I enjoy this fairy tale entitled Blue Bloods just the same!

    This is just another Irish Mutt opining, of course.

    Mumsy and Pop must sit down and sup with their own.

    Family counts; we love our own.

    How else might we find the value of treasuring all as our own?

    Somebody in this universe cares about me.

    That cannot be that bad can it?

    And screw repubs for claiming these values as their own!

    So there are folks who need a leg up so to speak.

    Would you really deny them a loaf of bread at the supermarket?

    Would you really deny them a chance to discuss their plight with a matriarch or patriarch with a degree and some experience in dealing with the human condition?

    Would you really deny them a chance to be retrained so that they could become part of the society as a functional member?

    There are those who were abused in elementary school, abused on the playground or the playground of their pedophiliac prone supervisors?

    There are those whose parents were lost in a drug infested underground; would you really deny these victims a chance?

    Walk a mile in everybody's shoes and you will end up tracking the distance to the sun and back.

    Blue Bloods will deal with these themes.

    Blue Bloods do not represent my enemy.

    It represents my salvation.

    (Boy, this is really sappy aint it! Ha!!!)

     

     

     

     

    Comments

    Look at the ax on that one.

    Now that's a show title I could get into.

    Just the thought that some asshole would get proper axe-murdered each week? I'd be tuning in. 

    Helluva concept, Dick. Helluva.


    Damn! Somebody read this and commented? ha

    I was caught by the title AX MEN!

    I get a kick out of it.

    Punny but evidently saleable. hahahahahaha

    Thanks for reading this anyway! ha

    Oh I have to add since I have had two beers at this point of the evening as they say, my grandpa was Forest Root. No kidding. Evidently he really was an heir of Elias Root, the statesman. He was born on an Indian Reservation in 1900.

    My best friend when I was a kid. He born in 1900 and me in 1950!

    He actually lumbered for awhile in his teens.

    the end


    As I posted on Paradigm, I stopped watching Blue Bloods and Torture Five-0 after a few episodes because they seemed to be looking for justifications to throw civil liberties out the window. One of the first few BB's involved a kidnapped young girl, and naturally they had to torture and threaten the suspect to save her. Another one involved a white guy shooting black gangbangers that were terrorizing a subway car.

    Frankly a lot of cop shows do that, even the lighter ones like Castle and The Mentalist, but these two were way over the top.


    I have to say, I myself thoroughly enjoyed Taken, which has a similar justification for the lead character employing torture. Unlike some of our conservative brethren, however, I realized it was fiction and in real life would just as easily lead to a false confession.


    Haven't seen Taken. My wife has us watching Missing, in which a retired female superspy does anything to anyone to get her kidnapped son back. It is also obviously fiction. I prefer Big Bang Theory, which is much more realistic.


    My wife and I are also watching Missing and enjoying it thoroughly. We both saw the similarities to Taken immediately (but with the gender roles reversed—in Taken, it's a father who'll do anything to bring back his daughter). I've never watched Big Bang Theory, believe it or not.


    There is a L&O circa 2006 when Farina was on and the plot involved the torture in order to find the kid.

    If I am not mixing up episodes there was another episode around the same time where the DA promised no jail time to the felon if he simply led them to the kid.

    Like you say, torture is involved in every gd crime story I have ever seen on film or on the tellie.


    I have a poster of Tom Selleck at peak Magnumess rolled up in the back of a closet. 

    I bought it while picking up some household things after a long work day.  There it was at the end of an aisle and it stopped me in my tracks.  Umm-mmm.  

    Definitely an impulse buy.  Never displayed, it is still rolled up in its original plastic tubing.  I bump into it when I spring-clean that closet and occasionally unroll it for a peek.  Still ummmmm.  

    Even so, post-Magnum Selleck has never appealed much.  That movie set in Australia was best and The Sacketts and Jesse Stone were okay.  I cannot put my finger on just why they never connected but that is probably why I have never watched Blue Bloods.  That and the tired trope of an Irish NYPD family.  Sorry, Richard.

    Although now that I think about it, it may be more just reactance to blatant attempts to pander to and/or indoctrinate a specific demographic.  It is on Friday nights which are usually reserved for the strange mix of young adult and senior programming.  Teen angst versus family time.

    The social conditioning from teevee programming does not even attempt subtlety anymore, if it ever did.  It is as right in your face as the commercial product placements.  

    But enough about Selleck and indoctrination.

    My current teevee guilty pleasure is Burn Notice.  I am late to the party having just discovered it a couple of months ago but it is such fun to watch.  Completely unserious, mostly unsnarky action adventure specifically designed to appeal to the most desirable advertising demographic:  18-49 year old males.  Watching how it blatantly panders to them just adds to the fun of watching.  

    I have figured out that I do not mind product placement in movies and tv but  tend to resent deliberate attempts at social engineering.  Maybe that is because it worked so well on me for so long until it didn't. 

    Fool me once.....  Eh?

     

     

     


    My guilty pleasure is Grimm (talk about a cop who bends the rules!), but the Repub side of the family seems to go for Once Upon a Time.

    BTW this guy argues that we should all be watching more reality TV.


    I watch Grimm, too.  It started out really well but then seemed to lose its arc.  Now it is exploring the 'ships.  I hate it when that happens.  

    Decided not to watch two fairy tale shows at once so deferred Once Upon a Time for future viewing so I have no opinion on it.  I did notice that Aylssa at ThinkProgress likes it better than Grimm.

    Why 'Once Upon a Time' Works Better than 'Grimm'

    Good article about reality TV.  Personally do not care for the genre that carries that name but have always enjoyed documentaries and how to or DIY programs.  I did like them better with background narration and voice overs instead of the 'excess of personality'* used now.  I would really prefer Nova scienceNow without David Pogue OR Neil deGrasse Tyson's distracting presences.  

     

    *phrase borrowed from Agatha Christie.


    I was with you until you insulted my hero, Neil deGrasse Tyson. He can do no wrong.


    I am perfectly happy to listen to him do voice overs. :-D

     


    I think Grimm's writers got locked in to rules that don't allow growth. Nick has to keep Hank, his partner, in the dark—doesn't make practical sense—Hank would be at less risk and would be a big help if he knew WTF was going on. Nick can't tell Juliette (who I loved in Quarterlife) either—which puts her at risk and she seems tough enough to also be a big help. Nick can't realize that Capt Renard is Wesen—why?

    I suppose if all those people found out we'd have the Scooby gang all over again, but seriously, my wife always knows when something's up with me, and none of my friends are Blutbaden.


    I am a fan of Jesse Stone also. I mean all he does is scowl, drink scotch and has this dog that follows him everywhere.

    I have  no idea why I like that show either.

    I have no doubts that Blue Bloods is playing to repubs, but I like the show!

    But I also loved Will Geer (a tried and true commie) and his clan with Jim Bob and all those kids sat down to din din together.

    We need more of this family message in all our tellie pleasures!


    Latest Comments