Your first paragraph is loaded with demeaning accusations and IMO is wrong. You then say:

Then I went to some of my favorite sources for related news on Twitter and then in like 5 minutes found counter-narratives galore and even objectivity. [Emphasis in original]

You even found objectivity? Cool. And you recognized objectivity? Double cool. And you saw objectivity there but not in the Mate’s reporting? Hmm. I guess we have to take your word for it since you say it but do not support it. There are no doubts on my part that some pundits defend the OPCW’s alleged cover up and some attack Mate’ in the process. I have seen some of them but none which I believe made a good case.  That said, I think local protocol would expect you to provide a link to your quick and easy find of evidence that he is wrong. 

Soon you start screaming. 

THE WORLD HAS CHANGED SINCE THEN, RADICALLY, HAVE YOU HEARD?

 When in the last hundred and fifty years of rapid development would that statement not be true, but also when would the statement, “The more things change the more they stay the same” not point to a strong element of historical truth? And how about history does not repeat itself but it often rhymes?  The next time a government lies to justify something they did or something they intend to do will not be the first time. When you say everything has changed do you mean that our government has quit playing loose with and covering up the truth and that critical looks by independent journalists at what they say are of no value because even if the government lied it was yesterday that they lied and yesterday is so ... uh ... yesterday and that we should now only listen to what the government says today and journalists should not question what they say today because today is a new day and  the world has changed. 

Next you start to really lose it.

… I don't want to waste my time debating your delusions, I'd rather spend the time reading to figure out what is really going on. I put things in threads not to ply a narrative BUT to actually figure out what's really going on, whether I like it or not. You don't help me by posting things on crime and police in the U.S., why should I help you promote your old timey narrative that the Cold War is still on.

 You start out calling me delusional which is one of several times you have made unflattering analysis of my psyche and go on to say that you are just into gathering information. As you do you are spreading onfo on your own psyche too.  

You don't help me by posting things on crime and police in the U.S., why should I help you promote your old timey narrative that the Cold War is still on.

 Maybe so many people that think a new cold war actually is beginning are wrong, I don't think so, but that is not what I posted about anyway although it is related.  And you go on to say that because I am not “helping” you make whatever point you are trying to make by posting an endless stream of crime by blacks is why you will not help me promote what information I offer a few times a month on international policy. Simple and cold as that huh?  That’s part of how your approval-needy mind works? No thanks. Your relentless posting of black crime news and accompanying comments, as a whole, look more like a vendetta against the now departed than any simple gathering of information. 

Those links didn't take me anywhere near as much time as responding in written word like this to you. I consider it a respectful favor to answer you and tell you that I found it wanting.

  Well pardon me if I don’t see the respect.  Until now you have brought me up in the third person described with derisive comments of your own or to PP or by high-fiving his cheap shots all the while ignoring both the subject of my news post and my direct questions to you that are directly relevant to the comment of yours where they appear. You also ask somewhere in this mess why I get angry. This is, I believe, another case of projection. You seem quite angry. It has been a long time since I have become angry at anyone here. 

... I consider it a respectful favor to answer you and tell you that I found it wanting. ISN'T THAT ENOUGH FOR YOU? Why don't you just say: thank you arta and PP, I disagree? Instead you use it as whipping boy to accuse me of what you actually do: fixate on a narrative that is comforting to you by reading only sources that confirm. You are supposed to do the work, write more shit up defending it and I might or might not read. Why do I have to do your work if I find the article wanting. I offered my opinion, why isn't it enough.

  Now that screaming is fucking screamingly hilarious. And so is the rest of that paragraph. Actually, your entire comment is pretty funny.  What am I expected to defend when nothing stated by the article is addressed, directly disputed, or compared to countervailing evidence.. You don't attack the article, you smear the author. You don't bring counter arguments, you just say that there are some but add that it is an old story and we should all just move on. And you express anger at wasting time which nobody asked you to spend one way or another but that you did in fact waste spouting nonsense. And you say I should thank you. 

I EVER complain that you don't look at the stuff I post. Why do you do that about yours? Expect hours and weeks of debate about it .I am not your seminar leader, I don't have to go through the article point by point, to debate it with you.

 Are you losing your voice from screaming? I assume you tried to holler ‘never’ instead of ‘ever’. Actually, just above you did complain that I never “help you” on your crime posts.  And I have never ever, not once, complained that you did not look at what I post or that you did not respond to what I wrote or linked to. I have pointed out here and other times when you only come in with deflection from the topic and with straw men to shoot at while refusing to address the actual topic. This thread is an example. 

In a response to HSG above you say,

“PP is the one who has raised interesting topics about the present and future on this thread, which got me interested enough to look for more.

  Those interesting topics on different subjects could be presented on a blog of his own and you two could stroke each other there rather than flooding this blog with ad hominem straw man off-topic deflections which I think PP does for perverse trolling pleasure. 

And in an earlier response to HSG further above there is more screaming:

 I REFUSE TO WASTE MY TIME DOING HIS WORK FOR HIM.

  Relax AA, I am not asking and have not asked you to do any work for me.