MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
It's true, people who read newspaper and magazine reports on science “may be influenced as much by the comments at the end of the story as they are by the report itself,” a study by University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers says.
“Disturbingly, readers’ interpretations of potential risks associated with the technology described in the news article differed significantly depending only on the tone of the manipulated reader comments posted with the story,” wrote authors Dominique Brossard and Dietram A. Scheufele.
http://www.jsonline.com/features/health/online-comments-hurt-science-und...
http://www.news.wisc.edu/releases/17723
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/a-blog-around-the-clock/2013/01/28/c...
Comments
When it comes to medical "science," complaining about this would be the pot calling the kettle black, I think.
It's because:
our medical research is fucked up beyond repair by the profit motive
and because
a majority of our doctors have been dis-incentivized, for many reasons (especially time constraints,) from being good diagnosticians and from keeping up on the research, as lousy and prejudiced as it might be,
that
people learn to scour comments on medical-related sites for symptoms like their own, and any bit of knowledge, any clue, any tip those people might have that might help them.
They have learned to do their own "research," using the trial group of similar sufferers on the internet, not because they want to, and not because they think it's an ideal situation, but because they are miserable with the results of iatrogenic illiness.
This might affect how they then approach stories in other fields of science, and whether they trust scientists.
I would argue that if non-medical scientists don't like that happening, one thing they should do is support the promotion of the truth that the practice of medicine is still not a science, but an art form, and may be.for a very long time to come (see, for example, Dr. Beverly Crusher.)
by artappraiser on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 2:55pm
Don't alot of artists work as if the profit motive isn't always there? Money makes the world go around but it would be interesting if more doctors started to practice with the illusion of artistry instead of moneymaking.
by Orion on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 2:57pm
A fine artist does.
by artappraiser on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 2:57pm
There's related news today oh boy; here's how it's presented on the front page of the print edition NYT:
Like just one quarter of $320 billion would be nice to spend on starting improving psychiatric care, eh? But our gummints can't afford that, they need to insure that drug developers make not just fortunes but continuing huge fortunes for an exceedingly long time.....
by artappraiser on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 6:14pm
I bet those made-up comments can't hold a candle to what we've got here at DAG!
by erica20 on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 3:44pm
When doctors and researchers, listen to the people affected, lives are saved
Bayer
is alleged to have suppressed clinical evidence it acquired relating to Baycol's side effects while it continued to market the medication.
by Resistance on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 6:09pm
When people listen and talk honestly in any situation, lives are saved. Almost all violence comes from confusion.
by Orion on Thu, 01/31/2013 - 1:56pm
I think people should know and not remain illiterate?
My daughter was just diagnosed, with Breast cancer and a geneticist confirms, No family link.
Mirena IUD Lawsuits - AboutLawsuits.com
BAYER ADVERTISING WARNING: In December 2009, the FDA issued a warning letter to Bayer over its promotions of Mirena. The FDA accused the drug manufacturer of overstating the efficacy of Mirena, presenting unsubstantiated claims, minimizing the risks of Mirena and using false and misleading presentations.
READ THE COMMENTS
by Resistance on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 5:54pm
I am saddened to hear of your daughter's diagnosis.
I read the comments. Very brutal experience.
by moat on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 6:46pm
Thanks Moat,
They went straight to Chemo first, to be followed up with a mastectomy, then radiation.
It's going to be a tough time for her little ones who'll learn first hand; their mommy will have to get sick, before she gets better.
by Resistance on Tue, 01/29/2013 - 7:11pm
This and the Chantix comment are actually really great comments and prove several things about this nightmare:
Alot of criticism about antidepressants makes one sound like a Scientologist, who opine about psychiatry because out of weird cult conspiracies. However, all modern "health care" is about money - these crooks will make you sick physically and mentally in order for you to need more of their care and thus give them more money.
Your daughter will need chemotherapy for the affects of medication that gave her cancer, people who have survived shootings or had their family shot in these drug fueled massacres will need physical and psychiatric care and the folks at Pfizer will be laughing their way to the bank, making sure not to slip on all the blood on their way through the door.
Profits over people. It's really that simple.
by Orion on Thu, 01/31/2013 - 2:11pm