MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
I had no paywall issues accessing from this link
Comments
Jemima Kelly sounds a bit jealous when she, after noting the big bucks that Greenwald makes, immediately calls him a "mere Hack". It gave me a chuckle to read her reporting done with a derogatory attitude that allows derogatory name calling of someone because they report with an attitude. I won't watch for further reporting by her because she sounds like a mere hack. Thanks for the post though because it reminded me of Freddie deBoer whom I followed for some time years back but had lost track of and forgotten. I just subscribed and if I find him as interesting and informative as I did in the past I will maintain my subscription at his 16 cent a day rate. That fits my budget since I quit the NYT. I recommend his link as an introduction to any who might be unaware of his writing.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 04/03/2021 - 2:22pm
Jemima Kelly sounds a bit jealous when she, after noting the big bucks that Greenwald makes, immediately calls him a "mere Hack".
A journalist should be more careful in the use of her words. She should have said the only good thing Greenwald might have conceivably done is be the lucky recipient of a "mere Hack."
by ocean-kat on Sat, 04/03/2021 - 3:51pm
I agree that journalists especially, but everyone else too, should be careful in their use of words. As I see it, your description of what she should have said begs several questions. What "hack" was Greenwald the lucky recipient of? Was luck the only reason he received it? And, how can the mere passive reception of anything be the doing of a "good thing"?
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 04/03/2021 - 5:19pm
how can the mere passive reception of anything be the doing of a "good thing"?
You're right, it wasn't a good thing. I over praised Greenwald.
Here's the thing. In every interaction Greenwald has with other people that I know very well what that other person said because I've read them deeply, for example Greenwald's articles criticizing Sam Harris. I know Greenwald lied repeatedly about Harris' writings and views, gross and deliberate distortions. So how could I have the slightest bit of trust in any information he supplies about things I don't know deeply when I know he is massively dishonest?
by ocean-kat on Sat, 04/03/2021 - 5:41pm
Poor Jemima has her own probs (or is being a kept woman a plus?)
But oddly she tweeted this writer on the way to meet the ransom payers - could it be these people we think of as diametrically opposed might be friends and closer to each other than we'd gathered?
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 04/03/2021 - 3:30pm
Ezra Klein:
by artappraiser on Mon, 04/12/2021 - 2:55pm