MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
A new UCLA rat study is the first to show how a diet steadily high in fructose slows the brain, hampering memory and learning — and how omega-3 fatty acids can counteract the disruption. The peer-reviewed Journal of Physiology publishes the findings in its May 15 edition.
"Our findings illustrate that what you eat affects how you think," said Fernando Gomez-Pinilla, a professor of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a professor of integrative biology and physiology in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Eating a high-fructose diet over the long term alters your brain's ability to learn and remember information. But adding omega-3 fatty acids to your meals can help minimize the damage."
While earlier research has revealed how fructose harms the body through its role in diabetes, obesity and fatty liver, this study is the first to uncover how the sweetener influences the brain.
The UCLA team zeroed in on high-fructose corn syrup, an inexpensive liquid six times sweeter than cane sugar, that is commonly added to processed foods, including soft drinks, condiments, applesauce and baby food. The average American consumes more than 40 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"We're not talking about naturally occurring fructose in fruits, which also contain important antioxidants," explained Gomez-Pinilla, who is also a member of UCLA's Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center. "We're concerned about high-fructose corn syrup that is added to manufactured food products as a sweetener and preservative."
[Better write this down]
Comments
We all need to start using common sense about the additives and 'substitutes' in our food. Obesity is only one side effect from ingesting 'pretend' food that is touted as being 'the same as'/'good as' natural fare, when in reality it is processed garbage. It's harmful to our minds, bodies and spirits. High fructose corn syrup is one of the main culprits in the escalation of diabetes and obesity.
by Aunt Sam on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:25am
Sugar doesn't make you stupid. High fructose corn syrup does.
by Michael Maiello on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 11:58am
I think HFCS is worse, for various reasons, but half of table sugar is fructose.
by Donal on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 12:28pm
Yes. Use raw or cane sugar. Naturally occurring fructose isn't so bad. It's the engineered stuff, which the industry claims is "chemically the same," that'll getcha.
by Michael Maiello on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 1:03pm
Extrinsic fructose is the problem, and even raw sugar is one half fructose, which can be tough for your liver to process. I suppose raw sugar is better than processed sugar, but I'd hardly give it a free pass.
by Donal on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 2:18pm
This explains much.
by cmaukonen on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 9:03pm
Could you change the title to "Corn Syrup Makes You Stupid"?
People seemed to do fine on the old Raisin Bran.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 1:40am
It isn't my title. I think people used to do fine because they were doing more and sitting less.
by Donal on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 7:46am
2 theories: sugar wasn't added to everything in doses of modern subsidized corn syrup, corn syrup has worse properties than standard white sugar
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 8:51am
HFCS is worse than sucrose, but both contain extrinsic fructose. I also think sugar wasn't as readily available, and cooked into everything the way it is now. Sweets were more of an occasional treat.
by Donal on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:17am
I must admit that Peracles' comment, combined with checking out the spin on the story at the link, did make me recall that binging on soda and sweets worked just fine for me getting through college. I would have never got all those term papers done on 3rd deadline after 2 extensions without binging on sugar soda, other sweets, cigarettes and caffeine in all nighters, then crashing for a day or two for repair from the binge. And often some of those binge papers were my best ones; same with exams. It's all tied up with the adrenaline/other hormones thing, I think. Which is probably also why such a diet is so damaging when followed long term......it screws with the hormone system?
by artappraiser on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:17am
Of course, what are the controls for evaluating anything in such an environment?
Toxic stew of mixed poisons + all-nighter = fuck an 'eh brilliance
Which one do we hold responsbile, or is it a synergy?
And how come it stopped working after college?
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:36am
how come it stopped working after college?
Well I don't know about anyone else, it still works for me, but just like with a lot of other things with age, not as well. (In my later 20's, I added lots of late nights with lots of Johnnie Walker Black, wine, and rich restaurant meals provided by a boyfriend with ill gotten cash combined with working 4 jobs. Wait, isn't that sometimes alluded to as the Keith Richards diet?)
Actually the study sounds extremely interesting to me, like they are onto something that's gonna turn some more of the more conventional wisdom about blood sugar and the brain on it's head. I just don't like the "sugar makes you stupid" spin this article put on it:
It's really about Omega 3 fats as much as it's about fructose sugar, maybe more so.
As someone who has long struggled with sleepiness both from effects of low blood pressure, and an inherited disposition to being a night owl with subsequent jet-lag-like brain-fog when trying to adhere to the rest of the world's schedule, and who also has discovered on my own that sugar combined with fat gives me a long-lasting boost while it would make others crash, I might be looking up more on the study.
by artappraiser on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 3:39pm
I have recently been discovering just how important amino acids are in producing the enzymes our bodies need to process food. And animal protein tends to have more of them per gram than plants. Makes sense since meat is really just the result of animals pre-processing plants and some other stuff for us.
I do find it hard to eat enough meat so I now take amino acid supplements.
by EmmaZahn on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 4:27pm
My initial comment was only going to be two words:
But then I found this neat little website to further confuse the issue. :-D
by EmmaZahn on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 4:05pm
I'm going to repost this video, Sugar: The Bitter Truth:
by Donal on Thu, 05/17/2012 - 4:40pm