Well, there is a small liquor store/grocer I pass that has a kind of kaffie klatsch on Friday nights with the locals playing cards & shooting the shit, and I can really see them singing Othello or something similar - though not with coffee, mind you.
But I'm still confused...
[oh, OceanKat spoke 2nd, AA 1st - so *AA* thinks the Supreme Court is right in overriding the state of California and giving megachurches the right to stay open even as business and social gatherings are closed, even though church services are being show to be a major source of infection? And AA thinks that a more liberal court would still support this, even though the 3 liberals on the court voted against (6-3 decision)? Or did I miss an implicit irony emoji?]
ETA - or is this somehow arguing about *how* the need for near-dictatorial powers are sold - e.g. Biden's doing a good job of justifying, but otherwise there's overreach? but again, the Supreme Court just overrode California, which is largely Biden's approach - yes, Jacobsen is too dogmatic in many cases - it's the kind of thinking that got Japanese-Americans thrown into camps during WWII - but with substantive justification it seems perfectly valid. But Gorsuch says no, it's no longer valid case law, while Kavanaugh's coalition doesn't seem to even require real evidence or justification for religious exemptions, just "this is what they want, they shouldn't be denied" sweep of a hand.. Bonkers or a good move?