MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Art Appraiser had linked here at Dagblog, to the New Yorker article on the Drake case a while back which I would highly recommend as background reading. While not a total victory for Drake and freedom of information/whistleblowers, the plea is a blow to the Obama Administration's efforts to crack down on government leaks, no matter how minor.
BALTIMORE -- A former top official with the National Security Agency who was accused of passing classified documents to a reporter has agreed to a plea bargain with prosecutors in a deal that pleased civil-liberties advocates but is a setback for the Obama administration's effort to crack down on leakers.
Former NSA executive Thomas Drake, 54, of Maryland is expected to plead guilty Friday in federal court in Baltimore to the unauthorized use of a government computer, a misdemeanor, while the government will drop 10 felony counts, including the unauthorized possession of classified documents, that could have sent him to prison for 35 years.
The lesser charge still carries a maximum penalty of up to one year behind bars and a $100,000 fine, but the Government Accountability Project, a whistleblower advocacy group, said that under the arrangement Drake wouldn't spend any time behind bars or pay a fine.
Comments
Roundup of links from Wall Street Journal's "Corruption Currents" blog, June 10:
by artappraiser on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 3:12pm
Somewhere I read that he had said he would not agree to any plea which made him accept any guilt. Maybe in Greenwald's column. It looks like he won't serve ny jail time so he has gotten off Scott free except for suffering fear, intimidation, great legal expenses, and a mark on his resume' that will hurt future employment opportunities. Justice served? Future whistle blowers encouraged?
If he did say he wouldn't plea but changed his mind I do not blame him at all for not risking felony conviction and years behind bars. I hope karma comes into play and balances out the price he paid with future good luck.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 6:06pm
At least they finally backed off the Espionage Act business; I think they're still trying to nail James Risen, too. Did you see David House is going before the Grand Jury on the 15th?
by we are stardust on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 6:26pm
I believe all he was doing was trying to save his agency a few hundred million dollars or so, on software they had in house but refused to use, and then were planning to contract out, which they did anyway, and which turned out to be a boondoggle as the stuff they bought didn't pan out.
by NCD on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 6:48pm