FBI director Comey contributed to Obama’s opponents in each of his  elections:  August 2008, $2,300 to John McCain ; 2012 ,$5000 ( the maximum )to Mitt Romney .Also $2,500 to Susan Brooks (Ind.), Brooks went on to win a House seat.

Nothing wrong with that of course but just possibly  relevant as perspective re his role  in the email controversy. 

Possibly relevant as perspective re what I suggest are my several Dagblog comments  that the security services "would classify a ham sandwich". In proposing  which I've almost certainly  overstated the relevance of my background , re  my military service and years in the Defense Industry.

I understand the Hillary camp may feel "least said, soonest mended." Perhaps right. That's what campaign managers get paid for knowing.  My non- professional gut feeling is that in this  case , more is better.

Political nature abhors a vacuum and until reality somehow intrudes Hillary's many enemies will have license for dark speculations about those 103 classified emails:

o the location of our most powerful nuclear deterrent?

o the poison we're trying to slip into Putin's hot chocolate?  

And her supporters , like me, will try to imply that half of the classified communiction were performance evaluations of State Dept underlings and the balance hurtful gossip about Merkel , Mugabe ,Abe etc.

Great guy that Comey no doubt is , as well as enthusiastic Republican ( although he said that he is not a registered one this year)  my recommendation is that  Hillary shouldn't rely on the kindness  of (Republican) strangers. I think she should  request that someone with the required clearance ( Bobby Inman?) review the naughty 103 and  release of as much information as possible about them.  ,

edited for grammar etc