MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
We are being told of the evils of “cancel culture,” a new scourge that enforces purity, banishes dissent and squelches sober and reasoned debate. But cancel culture is not new. A brief accounting of the illustrious and venerable ranks of blocked and dragged Americans encompasses Sarah Good, Elijah Lovejoy, Ida B. Wells, Dalton Trumbo, Paul Robeson and the Dixie Chicks. What was the Compromise of 1877, which ended Reconstruction, but the cancellation of the black South? What were the detention camps during World War II but the racist muting of Japanese-Americans and their basic rights?
Thus any sober assessment of this history must conclude that the present objections to cancel culture are not so much concerned with the weapon, as the kind of people who now seek to wield it.
Until recently, cancellation flowed exclusively downward, from the powerful to the powerless. But now, in this era of fallen gatekeepers, where anyone with a Twitter handle or Facebook account can be a publisher, banishment has been ostensibly democratized. This development has occasioned much consternation. Scarcely a day goes by without America’s college students being reproached for rejecting poorly rendered sushi or spurning the defenders of statutory rape.
Speaking as one who has felt the hot wrath of Twitter, I am not without sympathy for the morally panicked who fear that the kids are not all right. But it is good to remember that while every generation believes that it invented sex, every preceding generation forgets that it once believed the same thing.
Besides, all cancellations are not created equal. Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Brett Kavanaugh at his Supreme Court confirmation hearings of sexually assault, was inundated with death threats, forced from her home and driven into hiding. Dave Chappelle, accused of transphobia, collected millions from Netflix for a series of stand-up specials and got his feelings hurt.
Comments
From the NYT
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 8:46am
This is ridiculous propaganda and spin. NFL owners aren't hiring Kaepernick because they believe large numbers of viewers of the game are upset about his behavior and many will stop watching if he's hired. A large number of those, like me, who don't care about kneeling for the anthem or support him don't watch football. The owners care about ratings. If they thought that hiring Kaepernick would bring higher ratings because his supporters would start watching the game he'd be hired in a second.
by ocean-kat on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 12:43pm
I'd suggest that owners like most people may care about more than ratings. If the players start protesting one thing, where does it stop? Also, I suspect some of the owners are suckers for that National Anthem (I'm not much of a flag or German drinking songs kind of guy, so I'm left a bit cold by the whole insulting-the-troops complaint) and being full of themselves might associate with some kind of occasional overblown primordial patriotism.
In any case, there was an unfortunate confluence of factors beyond #TakeAKnee - a season full of injuries didn't help, Kap not getting along with 1 coach and not fitting a second's game style, Kap & SF restructuring his 6-year contract to allow him optimistically to go free agent the following year, etc. I'm under no illusions about the NFL being an enlightened employer, & Kap shouldn't have been either. And then to have attendance, profits & fans' good will threatened - well frankly I don't think many people expressed well enough the awfulness of police brutality towards blacks, and police departments themselves have been able to avoid responsibility for this kind of abusive crime - and I'd guess police lobbying inside sports organizations is pretty high & effective.
Kap's comments about Hillary in 2016 weren't terribly helpful - he basically attacked one of the better known politicians and hero to many, and lost a likely high-placed ally in hs predicament - and undoubtedly turn a large number of people from Kap supporters to largely indifferent about him.
That "Japanese-Americans locked up" as an example of "Cancel Culture" is plain stupid. It was a standard concern about ethnic groups' loyalties during wartime, and there was nothing Japanese-Americans did or said (I can confidently guess) that caused them to be "cancelled" (an dubious word for being put in concentration camps) - they were simply victims of the usual panic and paranoia during wartime. Ta-Nehisi goes in for a whole bunch of historical shotgunning, which only makes his column sloppy, not convincing.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 4:08pm
Yes, it's more complex than any one simple reason. Your's is a better analysis. I just gave what I thought was the largest reason because I didn't expect a nuanced conversation from rmrd and didn't want to spend the time creating a nuanced post for him to strawman and trivialize.
by ocean-kat on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 4:15pm
Executives always believe they are rationally weighing all the relevant factors.
Reminds me of the remark by a famous and famously successful exec: " Recruiting key subordinates" he said , "they carefully review whatever measurements are available and solicit appropriate advice.
Then hire a beautiful ivy leaguer."
They do what they feel like doing.
If a kneeling quarterback really annoys a CEO , he'll look at whatever data is available etc. And decide it would be uneconomic to hire him. Because he doesn't want to.
by Flavius on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 11:15pm
Funny stuff aside, 1) many CEOs these days doing radical data/analytics-driven decisions and transformation. Whether that applies to club owners, dunno, but "Money all" did have a big impact on how sports clubs see and use data.
2) acquiring Kap brings a whole political and business soap opera that ball clubs may not want to adopt. Someone explain the upsides that outweigh the risks, especially for a player who was largely injured his last season and now hasn't played in 3 years. Can they pick him up for B-string? And what kind of cash is he looking for? How many years contract? What will that do to corporate endorsements, box seats, all the high price stuff around teams? It's Qualcomm Arena, not San Diego stadium - how does Kap fit the Qualcomm culture and marketing message, to pick just one club & stadium & customer base.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 11/24/2019 - 4:30am
FWIW I had occasional contacts - at Board meetings - (he never physically attended- just phoned in )with one team CEO. Usually praised because his teams' consistently exceeded expectations given its market size.
Apart from being the source of some good stories he seemed - just normal. Could have been a plumber (I've always liked the line " He's like a plumber when you need a plumber") or a garage owner.
Who knows ? But my sense is , if he could have gotten Kap at his price ,Charlie would have given him the ball.
Another variant on the "beautiful Ivy Leaguer" syndrome.
by Flavius on Sun, 11/24/2019 - 10:03am
Oh, I know the tall clefted-chin types as "the natural" for the boardroom, but still, a bit of Evolution's at play...
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 11/24/2019 - 10:30am
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nfl/colin-kaepernick-isnt-bending-to-the-nfl-and-hes-beating-the-league-at-its-own-game/2019/11/19/90c0e288-0b10-11ea-bd9d-c628fd48b3a0_story.html
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 11/24/2019 - 3:09pm
Yes
Two wrongs don't make a right, and bullying is a wrong; an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind; bad behavior encourages more bad behavior, copycat syndrome can cause a lot of damage especially when it is the worst human impulses being copied,etc.....
Because Kap is being cancelled, it's fine for everyone on the left to cancel too? We want a Trump type world, is that what we are endorsing here? Right-wing media exaggerating past political correctness police helped get us Trump, so let's exaggerate it ourselves now and see if things get better?
by artappraiser on Mon, 11/25/2019 - 6:49am
There is nothing that can be done to change the opposing side. We can pray for them to change, but change is in their hands. Their hearts have to change. The results of the midterms and the results in Kentucky and Louisiana suggest a change is coming.
Being meek in the face of bullying will not halt the assault. Martin Luther King Jr was the most respectable Negro you could find. The racists wanted him dead. Protests by black people did not create the racists who tried to kill people attempting to cross the Edmund Pettus bridge, the evil was already present. Barack Obama reached across the aisle. He was met by Moscow Mitch saying that Obama should be a one term president and stealing a seat on the Supreme Court. The nine parishioners slaughtered at Mother Emanuel did not create Dylan Roof. The Left is not responsible for the insanity and cult like behavior on the Right.
Regarding Kaepernick specifically, we can agree that business owners can set standards. Laborers are not obligated to meekly agree to those standards. We have child labor laws, 48-hour workweeks, safety standards, etc. because laborers protested. Kaepernick kneeled and this upset the owners. Kaepernick was not obligated to suffer in silence. The NFL settled a lawsuit with Kaepernick. The NFL called Kaepernick to do a try out. Kaepernick did not call the NFL. Note that any NFL team was free to give Kaepernick a workout at their pleasure. Kaepernick did not like an agreement the NFL wanted him to sign, so he did his own workout at Charles Drew High School. He wore a Kunte Kinte t-shirt. Kaepernick realized that he was being played by the NFL, so he played them.
Baseball owners felt they had complete control of.athltes bodies, Players had to accept whatever trade the owners made. Players had no say in the matter. Curt Flood objected. After a long battle, player have free agency. Laborers can fight the owners. Some companies set hairstyle standards that had nothing to do with job performance. Laborers protested. Now hair discrimination is illegal in California, New York City, and Cincinnati. The owners standard is not the last word.
The Republicans are the ones with the power to end Trump world. We see Trump world supporting lies and obstruction of justice. There is nothing we can do about Trump world until Trump-worlders change their hearts. Kaepernick, Liberals, BlackLivesMatter, etc. do not create racists. The racists preceded them.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 11/25/2019 - 5:27pm
An annoying friend used to interfere with a really enjoyable argument by saying "Define Terms".
"There is nothing that can be done to change the opposing side". Define. Does "opposing side" =s "anyone who voted for Donald in 2016" ?
Then "There is nothing that can be done to change the opposing side" was wrong. This year in Kentucky.
How about " Nothing can be done to change the opposing side if you don't try. "
I like that poster showing a basketball net wth the words "You miss 100% of the shots you don't try".
And you never change an opponent if you don't try.
by Flavius on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 1:51am
The absurdity of "There is nothing that can be done to change the opposing side." followed by an obligatory MLK reference - if that's true, why the fuck did MLK bother? his whole 13-year outreach was a crapshoot relying on whites deciding they wanted to change, nothing he said or stirred up? What a lazy approach to politics, to blogging. "Nothing matters, racists gonna race." Ceding the battlefield and its harder battles leads to defeat, plain and simple. Oh, we can't answer the tough questions, persuade the most recalcitrant? their own damn fault, we done enough. We can rest (and lose) justified.
Kap coming out & attacking Hillary lost him half of the support he could have had. Losing her & her supporters for an actual presidency was a travesty, losing Blacks the totality of the support they could have had for #TakeAKnee. I don't mind him airing his views on a personal political preference - Chappelle made some comments, and I'll still watch & enjoy his comedy - he has a right to speak, and I can take his political thoughts under consdieration. But Kap's?
For someone leading a political movement, it was absofuckinglutely irresponsible. Kap kneecapped #TakeAKnee & #BLM right then and there. And then he didn't even fucking vote, even for a 3rd Party candidate he could admire, while millions of blacks were being denied the vote - great example for youth, for marginalized minorities, for movement politics. What an asshat. And now we're supposed to get all wound up in his personal career issues, half of which at a minimum were self-caused are just part of the game (injuries, strategizing contracts vs free-agency, which coach(es) you can work with...).
[also ironic here is corporate giant Nike as the good guy - I'm still watching what happened with Avenatti where the lawyer who took down Trump's lawyer was sidelined, no real questions asked. After watching all the intrigue with Ukraine & DoJ, do we accept that there was no behind-the-scenes setup with Trump's (at the time) biggest enemy? - https://www.usatoday.com/documents/6558560-Reply-Memorandum-of-Law-in-Su...
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 3:21am
He got some things right and not others. But he took a shot at the net and I respect that.
by Flavius on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 8:47am
Chappelle? He's supposed to be edgy and funny. If he manages #2, anything from #1 is fair game. Like celebrity roast, except it's all of us on the spit.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 9:16am
After the Civil Rights Bills passed, the South was lost to the Democrats.
https://billmoyers.com/2014/07/02/when-the-republicans-really-were-the-party-of-lincoln/
Yep, racists gonna race.
Edit to add:
The kneecapped BLM is working to elect Progressive DAs
https://apnews.com/38325cc86ec447c4a7db66734c4fe79b/St.-Louis-DA-victory-latest-for-Black-Lives-Matter-movement
2nd Edit to add:
Sorry to spoil the ending, but Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 10:28pm
The recent elections suggest that people are coming out voice their displeasure.
MLK got laws to change. Many people removed their children from schools to avoid mixing the races.
Tell me your great message to change hearts.
As it stands now we have 35-40% supporting a white nationalist and liar. We have a GOP that is walking in lockstep. We have Republicans supporting Putin over US intelligence agencies and willing to crucify members of the military and diplomats. What is your message to them?
Evangelicals are threatening civil war. Members of Congress and the cabinet are calling Trump the chosen one. Still 35-40 are OK with Trump.
I see Louisiana and Kentucky as people coming out to reject Trump.
Louisiana
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/17/democrats-hold-on-to-louisiana-governors-seat-despite-trump.html
Kentucky
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/06/politics/voter-turnout-kentucky-2020/index.html
Voters are rejecting Trump. They are riding the Democrats because the Democrats are anti-Trump.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 6:57pm
One very big changed heart and mind right here, a few stories down in this section:
http://dagblog.com/link/how-facebook-employee-helped-trump-win-switched-sides-2020-29590
Guy specializes in changing other people's minds, too.
by artappraiser on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 7:42pm
He had an internal change of heart. The Democratic alternative was already there. He rejected the stench of Trump.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 7:52pm
P.S. Mho, you need to check this social science paper out!
by artappraiser on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 7:46pm
I see the abstract, but would need to fork over $35.95 to get to how the study was done and the conclusions.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 7:58pm
Yes there are racists . And also people all along the spectrum from liberal to not -yet -racists- but- fixing -to -be .
In "behavioral" language (think Skinner) "aversives" do change behavior.
But so do "reinforcements". .
So I gladly concede kicking a racist in the shins works.
But so does rewarding him . When he actually does the right thing.
Think about Barak having a beer under the tree with Henry Louis Gates and the cop.
Who arrested him for breaking and entering . His own house.
Seemed to work.
Maybe even better.
by Flavius on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 4:01pm
Are you saying black Harvard students have more trust in Cambridge police?
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 7:44pm
I certainly don't know. I expect Henry Gates has a shrewd idea.
But not to miss an opportunity to repeat myself, the beers under a White House tree seemed a more useful tactic than ,say ,Obama's requiring a Federal review of Cambridge police bias.
by Flavius on Tue, 11/26/2019 - 10:40pm
The optics are better, but the distrust remains.
http://feministing.com/2018/04/26/who-gets-to-be-naked-at-harvard-university/
It is interesting that Liberals are told to be civil even in the face of threats of civil war by Evangelicals, Republican Congressmen etc, if things don't go their way. King directly confronted the racists.He lamented about the moderates.
From the Letter From a Birmingham Jail
There was a review of the situation
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/review-of-harvard-professor-arrest-finds-incident-was-avoidable
How many interviews have you seen where Trump supporters are really pressed about "Look her up.", or suggestions of violence at Trump rallies? What action do Trump supporters have to take when it comes to civility with Liberals?
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 11/27/2019 - 7:56am
Interesting quote from King but to win , you need to have the most of : fighters, voters, whatevers.
Reporting to headquarters in some early election , maybe Middlesex County DA, I made a disparaging remark about some group I 'd canvassed :maybe drinkers in front of a bar. Without even looking up from his tally sheet the pol said " They don't weigh 'em, they count 'em".
With a few more "deplorables" Hillary could have spared us this clown.
by Flavius on Wed, 11/27/2019 - 9:52am
Yeah, the groundswell of disenchanted voters who've abandoned Trump and moved to the Dems as Ukraine et al become more obvious. Oh wait, that hasn't happened. The true "deplorables" were never going to vote for her. The angle was to go for those who didn't want Trump's taint, who still had a sense of shame & moral rectitude. But as Adlai Stevenson responded re: "all thinking Americans are with you", that's all good and well but she needed a majority (in swing states).
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 11/27/2019 - 10:42am
then again, maybe Hillary would've gotten more traction with a #BeBest like platform.
Give people the benefit of the doubt...
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 11/27/2019 - 11:21am