MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
For years now, my spouse and I have had what academics call the "two-body problem": two careers at two universities in two places. It's a common problem for our professional generation, and we have an easier version of it than most. My spouse (the more accomplished blogger Flavia) works at a school about 250 miles away from mine. We maintain two homes and commute between them. We have been lucky that we are not farther apart, and that we can travel by car rather than plane. But like most of our generation, we have had no visible or easy solution for our problem. Professorships are very hard to come by, and job mobility after one's early career is almost nonexistent except for a handful of stars. We have always promised each other that we would live together full-time some day, but we have never been able to promise when or how that day would come.
But that "wrong move" turned out to be the right move for me. My colleagues and my institution saw a chance to hire someone who, because of the nature of the profession, would not otherwise be applying for this job at this stage of her career. (Every academic job search gets an abundance of applications from talented new PhDs, but since the market is poorly structured for mid-career job-seekers only a few places get many talented mid-career applicants.) This was not about credentials that Flavia scraped together after this job opening turned up. She didn't write that book over Thanksgiving weekend. This was about qualifications she has been steadily building for years, before she had any notion that this job opening would exist.
My ultimate role was to strengthen Flavia's negotiating hand. The decision to offer her a job was about her qualifications. The decision to make her an offer reflecting those qualifications was almost certainly about both the opportunity to hire her and the possibility of losing me. Hiring Flavia is a bargain at virtually any price, but passing up a bargain is easier than giving up something you already have. My school could have saved money by hiring one of those promising-but-inexperienced applicants for less money, but only at the risk of losing one of their established faculty members.
I am sure that my colleagues believed that I might leave; I have spent the last five years working under the assumption that I would eventually have to. And I have tried to be aboveboard about external job searches, telling my department chairs when I was applying and keeping them up to date about the progress of outside searches (including telling my chair promptly when I was eliminated). That included being transparent about my application to my spouse's school.
I have also worked hard on publishing my research over the last five years, because it's a publishing record that is most likely to help you change jobs. My annual reports have made it clear that my supervisors consider me productive. So the idea that I might leave my job in order to be closer to my wife wasn't a new concept introduced in the midst of negotiations. I didn't actually say anything to my bosses during negotiations. My institution had already spent a few years thinking about the chances that I might leave, and the chances that I could.
But I also spent the last five years trying to be a good citizen of my department and university. This should also have been the wrong move, because I didn't expect to be able to stay, but it almost certainly turned out to be the right one. The conventional wisdom when you want to change jobs is that you should focus as much of your energy on research and publication as you can, and as little on service or committee work as you can get away with. I've written before about research as hard currency and service as local scrip. Publication is valuable to outside employers, while service is mostly valuable to the place you're serving. One keeps its value wherever you go, and the other can only be spent on-site. Amassing local scrip has no purpose if you're planning to leave. More importantly, I didn't believe that my institutional scrip could ever be put toward what I really wanted, because I didn't think "Mid-career Job for Spouse" was something they carried in the company store.
But I've spent the last few years doing a lot of administrative work. I have told my department that I needed to look for other jobs, but I have also told them that I was committed to doing my job properly for as long as I was here. That means working for the school's long-term future whether I intended to share it or not, doing some serious administrative chores inside my department and also becoming one of the department's public faces to the rest of the university. I did those things for the same basic reasons that baseball players run out ground balls: not because I thought it would get me anywhere, but because I would feel bad about myself if I didn't and because I was afraid if I stopped doing things the right way I would develop bad habits and lose the ability to do my job properly. But today I see the last few years differently. If I had used my weekly commute as an excuse to slack off, I'm not sure my colleagues would have worked so hard to end that commute. And I don't think they would have focused on keeping me if I had focused on trying to leave, at the rest of the department's expense. This could not have possibly happened if Flavia were not so very qualified. It likely would not have happened if my department did not think I could, and would, eventually leave. But they also had to believe that I was worth keeping.
The other reason they teach ballplayers to run out hopeless ground balls is because occasionally it does actually get you somewhere. Sometimes you hit the ball and don't seem to have any chance at reaching base. But then some piece of unexpected luck, some fluke, gives you an unforeseen opportunity. Players are taught to run hard for first base, no matter what, so that they have a chance to be lucky. You need to put in the work before there is any apparent hope; if you don't turn on your full speed until something surprising happens, you're probably too late. If you ever get a sudden bit of good luck, you need to be running as hard as you can.
Comments
Congratulations to both of you! Must feel like winning the lottery, since you say this sort of thing rarely happens this way. I know nothing about academic life (except what I read in Jane Smiley's Moo) but it sounds like you came at it with a plan and made it work for you. Also, serendipity.
by Ramona on Mon, 03/10/2014 - 8:04am
Thank you, Mona! It is totally like winning the lottery. It's so hard to make these things work out.
by Doctor Cleveland on Mon, 03/10/2014 - 6:43pm
Yes, the lottery.
But don't they say that luck favors the person who prepares?
by Peter Schwartz on Tue, 03/11/2014 - 10:44am
So Doc, I've put your wife's book on my "wish list"...it sounds interesting.
But of course, the book gave her name, and your delightful encomia propelled me to find out more. She sounds great.
In the course of my two-second research, however, I came across one of those student evaluations of professors for her. Why they put them online for anyone to see is beyond me.
But some of the student comments made me laugh OUT LOUD. Particularly the encouraging ones that said, more or less: "Don't be intimidated by this course. I'm an idiot, and I passed. So you can, too."
Then there was one that brought JK Rowling, of all people, and said something like: "This professor thinks she's JK Rowling. When you get back your paper, there's red all over it. You make the changes and hand it back, and then she critics you again."
I can feel their pain.
by Peter Schwartz on Tue, 03/11/2014 - 10:57am
Yes, those are hilarious, Peter. You aren't the only person who laughs at those, I'll admit.
But those aren't the real teaching evaluations from her job; those of course aren't online, because you're right. It would be a terrible idea. The site you found is a private site that asks students to anonymously rate professors online. The only good thing about that site is that students mostly seem to have gotten bored with it.
For what it's worth, my own real name is now linked from my Dag profile. I'm not going to use it on the blog, but any reader is free to know it. I just don't want students googling their professor finding the blog where I spout my political and religious opinions as one of their top hits.
by Doctor Cleveland on Tue, 03/11/2014 - 11:26am