MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Sometimes, I get confused when people use slang or terms of art. I’m more of a straightforward, un-fancy communicator. I’m ashamed to admit it might be something I have in common with our former president—although I tend not to make up my own words.
Something I am less ashamed to admit is that I don’t always follow some of the terms bandied about on the blogs. One of those terms is “strawman.” I’m from the Midwest. Out here, strawmen live in fields and they don’t generally talk, which makes it difficult for them to participate in arguments.
But, I’m proud to admit that today, for possibly the first time, I feel I have an absolute grasp of what “creating a strawman” means. Thanks, Republicans!
See if you can follow the trail of metaphorical straw. (Side Note: real strawmen leave a straw trail too, only it’s not metaphorical and it makes me sneeze.) From what I’m hearing coming out of conservative mouths this week, here’s what I’ve got so far:
Wheeeeeeee. Because it’s not like we have maximum security prisons or anything. Those prisoners are coming to your neighborhood and Republicans want you to be hiding-under-your-bed-wetting-your-pants scared.
Honestly. It’s not like we should expect anything remotely honest from the people who want you to believe that dinosaurs weren’t extinct until a few thousand years ago, at which point we were calling them dragons. But just how stupid do they think we are?
Don’t answer that. I can only handle one strawman per day.
Comments
Actually, I'm not sure if that qualifies as a strawman – unless they're claiming that this is an argument being presented by "the other side". (I'm sure Genghis will correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm no expert in the sophistic arts myself.) Of course, that does leave open what the proper terminology for such an argument is, and it's surely not a new type of argument from them. I think this fallacy is similar to the argument some pro-choicers make that if you don't support allowing abortion you need to be willing to adopt every child that's not wanted. (Don't get me wrong: I'm not wanting to make abortion illegal. I just find that particular argument to be flawed.)
As I'm cogitating on it, "non sequitor" is the expression that comes to mind.
by Nebton on Thu, 05/07/2009 - 3:27pm
Great. I'll just stick to my simple words from now on.
by Orlando on Thu, 05/07/2009 - 3:29pm
That would be best. Logic is hard.
Seriously, I'm sorry to deflate your sense of midwestern achievement, but this is not a strawman fallacy. A strawman fallacy is an argument that you attribute to your opponent and then proceed to demolish the hell out of, when in fact, the argument that you've just demolished the hell out of is a total misrepresentation of your opponent's argument, which explains why it was so easy to demolish the hell out of. It's called "strawman" because demolishing the hell out of a misrepresented argument is like winning an epic battle with a strawman. It's not real.
The fallacy you describe is the Asshat Fallacy.
by Michael Wolraich on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 12:31am
You coasties sure like to look down on us midwesterners...
Using Google, I found this good example of which the O does speak:
I resisted the urge to substitute names...
I like ellipses...
My first link click through was for:
Alas I think it is tried and true (repulbicans seem to love this one):
That is my 2 canadian pennies.
by elliottness on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 2:08am
Whatever. You guys are so mean. Stop picking on the girl.
by Orlando on Fri, 05/08/2009 - 9:23am