MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Next Tuesday is the second Tuesday in November, and so for many of us (most of us?) this means that there are local and/or state elections to think about. These are the types of elections that those supporting the various Occupy movements should approve of: typically little money is invested in campaigning and politicians who are frequently known by their supporters or at least only one or two degrees separated. Furthermore, those people who get elected to national offices (which is what the media usually focuses on, and unfortunately what many of us, including me, focus on) usually occupied state offices previously, and those people who get elected to state offices usually occupied local offices previously.
That's a round-about way of saying that it matters who gets elected to local offices, so vote next Tuesday!
I lack Articleman's and Nate Silver's ability to condense national events down into a semi-digestible summary, so rather than even trying, I'm going to talk about what's going on in my corner and invite/encourage my fellow dagbloggers to do the same in the comments.
OK, first, there's the Albemarle County School Board (although my address is Charlottesville, I'm technically outside the city boundary) for which I can choose one member-at-large. The choices are Cindi Burket, Ned Gallaway, and Joseph Oddo. In researching these, Oddo was easy to eliminate. He home schools his kids (nothing wrong with that, but not someone I want on the County School Board), and his "educational hero" is Ron Paul. 'nuff said. So, that leaves Burket and Gallaway. I'm leaning towards Gallaway because he's a former high school teacher and his kids are currently in school.
Next, there's the Soil and Water Conservation Director. Here, we pick two of the following: Steven G. Meeks, Lonnie M. Murray, and David B. Norford. So, I just need to figure out who I don't like, and the answer is Norford. All I really have to go on is their blurbs in the Hook (and Murray's campaign's Facebook page), but when I read what they think is the "critical issue", he loses.
The rest are relatively easy, I like David Toscano as my Member of the House of Delegates. I'm on his mailing list, and I've liked what he's had to say. I'm less happy with Edd Houck as my Member of the Senate of Virginia, but his challenger looks even worse. Denise Lunsford (D) is the only one running for our Commonwealth's Attorney, and Chip Harding (R) is the only one running for Sheriff. Despite the "(R)" after his name, from what I can tell he's not so bad. That's actually true about a lot of our local Republicans here (Bryce Reeves being an exception).
So, tell me about your local elections. If you have to do some research first, do it now. It'll give you a chance to talk to your friends prior to Tuesday. But, please share. I'm interested in how much time others spend on these decisions. I don't think I spend as much time as I should, but I also think I spend more time than most (as if that's a valid excuse).
Comments
VA,
I haven't spent too much time focusing on elections in NYC, although I do notice that the balloting machines are in the lobby of my apartment. But I think the most important election this month might be the one in Ohio, where's there's a statewide referendum (Issue 2) to repeal SB 5, which is another attack on public employee bargaining rights a la Wisconsin.
by Bruce Levine on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:00am
It is good to be aware of that particular referendum for those who are looking to donate to campaigns since if SB 5 is not repealed, this stuff will likely spread to other states.
However, I think that right now (i.e., between now and next Tuesday) the single most important races to pay attention to are the ones we can vote in. Not only does it affect our communities, but it also sets up who will be tomorrow's national leaders.
by Verified Atheist on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:31am
Does anyone else have any upcoming elections/ballots they'd like to share? It's good to know what's on the ballot before you show up on Tuesday! It's bad to not show up on Tuesday!
by Verified Atheist on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 3:38pm
Anyone?
by Verified Atheist on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 7:21am
Hey VA, well Washington State at this point is run by the citizen initiative. This time around we have COSTCO trying to buy an election by initiative. You can only purchase hard alcohol in this state in a state run liquor store. So COSTCO is funding this particular initiative, 1183 to close all liquor stores so they can sell hard alcohol. Of course I am against this, I don't think we need more people laid off, which would be the result of this initiative passing, COSTCO won't be hiring more people to sell booze, but they sure will make a killing if they get to, as if they need more.
As a rule I vote against every initiative proposed by anyone. I've voted for exactly one in my life, way back in I think it was 1986 or 1988, Ross Schaeffer, a local comedian circulated an initiative to change our state song to Louie Louie, that was a good one. But since the late 1990's our initiative process has been co-opted by people who are now making as living writing initiatives and stripping the state of the power to tax. It's been hell on our ferries our roads and our schools.
So I am not voting for 1183, 1125 or the 6 other initiatives on the ballot! Damn. Seriously one side of my ballot is taken up with initiatives!
by tmccarthy0 on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:24am
It's good to be informed on the initiatives (as it seems you are), and it's also good to have a fall back position such as the one you mentioned when you find an initiative on the ballot you didn't know would be there (I know it's happened to me before). I haven't found the same dynamics for the initiatives here in Virginia (I'd say roughly half of them are decent), but I don't know if that's because I'm less cynical/more naive or if because our process is systematically different. That we don't have any initiatives (at least none were mentioned on the various ballot searches I did) suggests that the latter is probably true, although that doesn't rule out the former!
With respect to the alcohol issue itself, we've had our own issue here where our governor wants to privatize our liquor sales as a form of short-term revenue (never mind the long-term costs).
P.S. Thanks for responding!
by Verified Atheist on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:47am
In NYC, it's all local judges, many for civil court, and district attorneys, and it's very local, each of the 5 boroughs is a different slate, except for one city councilman in one district in Queens. Nearly all of them are running unopposed, including that councilman; it looks like Brooklyn is the borough where there's a tiny bit of competition. There is only one race and one person on the ballot in the Bronx, where I am: district attorney. Like many of the other races, he has the nomination of all three parties--Democratic, Republican and Conservative.
Personally, I think it's a sorry state of affairs that these offices are not timed to be voted on when there are other races. Just makes people cynical when they see ballots like the one in the Bronx.
by artappraiser on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 9:51am
That does sound unfortunate (and explains why Bruce hasn't been paying much attention to the NYC races). Ironically, I'm more bummed about my two choices for State Senator than my one choice for Sheriff - even though that one choice is a Republican!
by Verified Atheist on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 10:04am
On the Island Hope Zimmerman is an attractive candidate for the State Supreme Court.
It's a strange race with 18 candidates for 10 positions.
by Flavius on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 11:21pm
So are there 18 candidates and you pick your favorite 10, or is there some other system for deciding which 10 make it?
by Verified Atheist on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 7:34am
That's it. Choose your favorite 10 out of the 18.
by Flavius on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 9:42am
I imagine it would take some effort to make all 10 of those be well-informed choices.
by Verified Atheist on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 10:02am
Underneath the list of candidates in their voters' guide the League of Women Voters has a bar reading
Maddeningly, it doesn't appear.
Oh well.
BTW there are 21candidates, rather than 18 as I wrote above. . Eleven Republicans and 10 Democrats. .I think I got that right.
No double dippers as in artappraisers comment.
by Flavius on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 4:50pm
You & Flav bringing that up entices me to produce more information. When I said it looked like there was a tiny bit of competition in the borough of Brooklyn, what it was is that one of the contests is something like "vote for 6" out of a roster of 9.
But in the other boroughs, it's like this: "vote for 8 from a roster of 8," but there are like 12 entries on the ballot because some of the candidates have nominations from both parties are are therefore listed twice, but others are just one party nomination unopposed. It's like a joke to some, I'm sure.
Here I copied the Manhattan borough listing so you get an idea of what I am talking about. This is what they will see on their ballots in Manhattan. There is no choice, the voter is just endorsing. Except that with a couple of your selections, you get to endorse whether you like the single candidate as a Republican or a Democrat (where one of the jokes might come in):
The full pdf list is here:
http://vote.nyc.ny.us/pdf/documents/boe/2011GeneralElection/CandidacyLis...
the "counties" are listed in the left menu ("New York county" is Manhattan, "Kings" is Brooklyn, "Richmond" is Staten Island, and "Queens" and "Bronx" are self-explanatory.)
by artappraiser on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 3:57pm
That's … bizarre, to say the least. I think* I'd love to see a surprise third-party candidate which takes advantage of Harold A Adler or Barbara Jaffe splitting the vote between their Democratic and Republican halves.
*Assuming it's not a Tea Party candidate.
by Verified Atheist on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 8:02pm
I'm an expat living in Canada, so our elections are over for the moment. Your point about the importance of local elections, however, is palpable in my Ward, #20.
Our federal representative (MP, member of Parliament) is Olivia Chow, wife to former NDP leader, Jack Layton. Both began their careers at the local level, serving as city councillors.
Right now, the city councillor in Ward 20 is Adam Vaughan, who belongs to no party, but is likely to be the chief contender against our right-leaning mayor, Rob Ford, when Ford runs for re-election in 2014.
A big issue in Toronto now is that when Ford ran--does this sound familiar?--he promised to balance the budget while preserving all city services.
That idea is proving impossible, so--as a candidate who came to prominence representing the suburban GTA--Ford now proposes to cut basic services in the downtown core, including city parks, daycare, affordable living, and public transit.
Vaughan is being really smart. He's not making a public stink, but he is organizing the downtown residents, through community meetings, e-newsletters, and targeted responses to Ford's agenda.
When Vaughan was running for re-election to council last year, Rogers televised the local debates. In the Ward 20 debate, it came out that Vaughan did not have a University degree. It just happens that he's smarter and better organized than all of the other candidates combined. Before becoming Councillor, he was a political journalist and activist. I respect my fellow Torontonians for lifting someone like Vaughan to the Councillor-ship. I predict he will become mayor in 2014. After that, most likely, the NDP will still be looking for someone to fill Layton's shoes.
Our Ward tends orange (the NDP colours), as will--I predict--the country in the coming years.
Moral: Local politics are part of the social fabric here, meaning that the continuity from municipal to federal feels almost organic.
by arc400 on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 11:48am
Thanks for your contribution and the insight into Canadian politics.
by Verified Atheist on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 11:53am
Sure, although you might have berated me reasonably for not getting an absentee ballot to vote in Pennsylvania on Nov 8. It's okay, I'll beat myself up about that and get to reading about the candidates now.
In short, I liked your post a lot and wish more people would put more energy into the local stuff.
by arc400 on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 12:14pm
I've been thinking about this some, and I wonder since you're not living in Pennsylvania, would you be able to vote in the local elections? The reason I wonder this is because I have a friend who moved prior to the 2010 elections and was turned away from the polls because she didn't update her voter registration card and the voter registration card didn't match her current address. (Part of me also thinks this was a mistake on the part of the poll worker.)
by Verified Atheist on Sat, 11/05/2011 - 8:08pm
I voted early on Wednesday and am doing a poll shift Tuesday morning. State senate and house, school board, county board of supervisors, school bond, and one other I'm blanking on are what's on the ballot this time.
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:21pm
If you don't mind me asking, which state and/or county?
by Verified Atheist on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:23pm
Fairfax County, Virginia (DC suburbs).
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 11/04/2011 - 1:25pm
Weather is beautiful here today, sunny, around 50 or so when I was there from 7:30-9:00. Our precinct goes around 60/40 Dem in presidential races lately. Local races where contested are typically more competitive. Local Democrats in these parts do a decent job overall, I feel. The Republicans are horrible. They would gut the tax base that pays for the services the people in the county value. When that comes out clearly they lose lately.
Our GOP counterparts, who with the exception of the sole, sourfaced male I found pleasant, were distributing their sample ballots on blue paper as were we. One of our workers was more sure than I was initially that that was very deliberate, intended to confuse folks. I thought it possible--after all, the GOP brand is in even worse shape these days than the donkey brand. And that's saying a lot. And in fact, a number of folks took blue sample ballots and seemed surprised when we would ask them if they would like a "Democratic sample ballot", thinking the blue one they had must have been the Democratic sample ballot because blue is the Democrats' color, right? One of the GOP folks pointed out that the Democratic-endorsed school board candidate had a red sign.
The school board member/candidate showed up, just in time for our crank neighbor who is constantly trashing our local public schools to let her know how bad his daughter's high school teachers were. He and his wife both have good-paying jobs and they have just one kid. So if the teachers in the high school are doing such grievous damage to their daughter--who from afar seems to us to be doing well--why are they sending her there? This is the question that seemed to beg for the response I chose not to ask for from him.
We didn't ask the school board member about her red sign.
So there you have it, a report from the front lines. A wee bit different than the typical dagblog thread exchange. I really enjoyed chatting with the four 5th-grade girls who were selling snacks and drinks for their Girl Scout troop. They were quite charming. One of them, from Britain and here for 5 years, asked me if she could distribute Democratic sample ballots, too.
by AmericanDreamer on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 12:20pm
Thanks for the update, AD.
by Verified Atheist on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 1:05pm
You may have seen this but in case not, crossposted at HuffPo as well as Blue Virginia, "Why the Virginia Democrats Lost the State Senate", by former Arlington County Democratic Chair Peter Rousselot: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-rousselot/2011-virginia-elections_b_1083901.html
by AmericanDreamer on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 1:15pm
I had not seen it, thanks. We haven't lost the State Senate yet, by the way. There's a chance that Houck could still beat Reeves in a recount, although it's not likely. The piece is a bit biased against Moran (although to his credit, Rousselot divulges that bias openly), but it makes a lot of valid points.
by Verified Atheist on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 1:23pm
Here's a short piece http://www.nationaljournal.com//member/hotline/glass-half--20111109
by AmericanDreamer on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 1:55pm