Earlier this week, I noted that no one had yet gone over the line and scapegoated the mentally ill.

I have just finished reading Wayne LaPierre's remarks, and I'm here to let you know that Wayne has done just that: put out the cat's paw  or trial balloon to scapegoat the mentally ill:

Page 3, first paragraph:

"A dozen more killers? A hundred? More? How can we possibly even guess how many, given our nation's refusal to create an active national database of the mentally ill?"

This time, it's about the scapegoats people are trying to find and, IMO, pathologically require as a part of some fake grieving process and, allegedly, change[1].

It's pretty clear that part of the "process" of the upcoming conversation is well underway so I'm engaging in more wishful thinking and trying to stomp, using sarcasm, on the relevant flailings that I've seen here at DB and elsewhere. Here's my so-far list:

1) Video games

2) Quentin Tarantino

3) SSRI

Tonight, while I was at a bookstore and again while I was washing dishes, I mulled the events of the past week and was thankful that America rejected the bully.

As I was thinking of this, I was also thinking of how to remind people that Romney is a bully, and a blood-heir to the bullying politics of the GOP.

It seems to me that everyone (where everyone is, generally, "the Media") has chosen to go mute on the sex angle.

Seriously, everyone: the Republican nominee for President speaks at the home of a private banker (you remember bankers, right, peanut gallery? the ones who screwed, basically, the entire world a few years ago?) who throws or allows or hosts orgies in his pool at the Hamptons...I take it the radio silence is some sort of modesty?

Questions:

What was the ratio of penises to vaginas?

Was it het-on-het, or were multi-organed pansexuals allowed in?