MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
David Brock, NBCnews.com, September 7, 2018.
I used to know Brett Kavanaugh pretty well. And, when I think of Brett now, in the midst of his hearings for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, all I can think of is the old "Aesop's Fables" adage: "A man is known by the company he keeps."
And that's why I want to tell any senator who cares about our democracy: Vote no.
Twenty years ago, when I was a conservative movement stalwart, I got to know Brett Kavanaugh both professionally and personally.
Brett actually makes a cameo appearance in my memoir of my time in the GOP, "Blinded By The Right." I describe him at a party full of zealous young conservatives gathered to watch President Bill Clinton's 1998 State of the Union address — just weeks after the story of his affair with a White House intern had broken. When the TV camera panned to Hillary Clinton, I saw Brett — at the time a key lieutenant of Ken Starr, the independent counsel investigating various Clinton scandals — mouth the word "bitch."
But there's a lot more to know about Kavanaugh than just his Pavlovian response to Hillary's image. Brett and I were part of a close circle of cold, cynical and ambitious hard-right operatives being groomed by GOP elders for much bigger roles in politics, government and media. And it’s those controversial associations that should give members of the Senate and the American public serious pause.
Call it Kavanaugh's cabal: There was his colleague on the Starr investigation, Alex Azar, now the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Mark Paoletta is now chief counsel to Vice President Mike Pence; House anti-Clinton gumshoe Barbara Comstock is now a Republican member of Congress. Future Fox News personalities Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson were there with Ann Coulter, now a best-selling author, and internet provocateur Matt Drudge.
At one time or another, each of them partied at my Georgetown townhouse amid much booze and a thick air of cigar smoke.
In a rough division of labor, Kavanaugh played the role of lawyer — one of the sharp young minds recruited by the Federalist Society to infiltrate the federal judiciary with true believers. Through that network, Kavanaugh was mentored by D.C. Appeals Court Judge Laurence Silberman, known among his colleagues for planting leaks in the press for partisan advantage.
When, as I came to know, Kavanaugh took on the role of designated leaker to the press of sensitive information from Starr's operation, we all laughed that Larry had taught him well. (Of course, that sort of political opportunism by a prosecutor is at best unethical, if not illegal.)
Another compatriot was George Conway (now Kellyanne's husband), who led a secretive group of right-wing lawyers — we called them "the elves" — who worked behind the scenes directing the litigation team of Paula Jones, who had sued Clinton for sexual harassment. I knew then that information was flowing quietly from the Jones team via Conway to Starr's office — and also that Conway's go-to man was none other than Brett Kavanaugh.
That critical flow of inside information allowed Starr, in effect, to set a perjury trap for Clinton, laying the foundation for a crazed national political crisis and an unjust impeachment over a consensual affair.
But the cabal's godfather was Ted Olson, the then-future solicitor general for George W. Bush and now a sainted figure of the GOP establishment (and of some liberals for his role in legalizing same-sex marriage). Olson had a largely hidden role as a consigliere to the "Arkansas Project" — a multi-million dollar dirt-digging operation on the Clintons, funded by the eccentric right-wing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife and run through The American Spectator magazine, where I worked at the time.
Both Ted and Brett had what one could only be called an unhealthy obsession with the Clintons — especially Hillary. While Ted was pushing through the Arkansas Project conspiracy theories claiming that Clinton White House lawyer and Hillary friend Vincent Foster was murdered (he committed suicide), Brett was costing taxpayers millions by pedaling the same garbage at Starr's office.
A detailed analysis of Kavanaugh's own notes from the Starr Investigation reveals he was cherry-picking random bits of information from the Starr investigation — as well as the multiple previous investigations — attempting vainly to legitimize wild right-wing conspiracies. For years he chased down each one of them without regard to the emotional cost to Foster’s family and friends, or even common decency.
Kavanaugh was not a dispassionate finder of fact but rather an engineer of a political smear campaign. And after decades of that, he expects people to believe he's changed his stripes.
Like millions of Americans this week, I tuned into Kavanaugh's hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee with great interest. In his opening statement and subsequent testimony, Kavanaugh presented himself as a "neutral and impartial arbiter" of the law. Judges, he said, were not players but akin to umpires — objectively calling balls and strikes. Again and again, he stressed his "independence" from partisan political influences.
But I don't need to see any documents to tell you who Kavanaugh is — because I've known him for years. And I'll leave it to all the lawyers to parse Kavanaugh's views on everything from privacy rights to gun rights. But I can promise you that any pretense of simply being a fair arbiter of the constitutionality of any policy regardless of politics is simply a pretense. He made up his mind nearly a generation ago — and, if he's confirmed, he'll have nearly two generations to impose it upon the rest of us.
Comments
In an ideal world, Mr. Brock would be one of the most important witnesses to call for a confirmation hearing as regards Judge Kavanaugh. Especially as he wouldn't lie under oath about matters related, he knows the consequences well
by artappraiser on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 10:47am
So Kavanaugh is exactly the guy Republicans want for Supreme Court!!
Brock is either joking us or slyly pretending that Republicans really want a "fair arbiter".
Does the GOP want fair anything? (taxes, health care, elections, voting rights, investigations, civil rights, housing, student loans, consumer rights etc) ? NO. That's why they want control of the Supreme Court folks, and why they want Kavanaugh on it!
by NCD on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 11:20am
Prior to putting Kavanaugh at the top of their SCOTUS list I wonder if the Federalist Society's vetting process included vigorous efforts to probe for these types of skeletons in his and others' closets?
I bet the processes they and some others producing SCOTUS lists have been using will undergo some rethinking and adjustments going forward.
One positive coming out of all of this is that pols with an old boys' mentality are on notice that they may no longer be able to get away with ignoring or giving short shrift to the potential for this type of personal conduct to blow up in their faces. One might have thought the Hill-Thomas events would have driven that home. It would have helped if Thomas had been voted down or had withdrawn.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 11:33am
analysis-wise, your point brings up for me the point made by a tweet I quoted on another thread
There was a short list. It's been reported that Grassley was not happy with this pick. Given their goal, he should have stood up to Trump and attack this guy right away and let this guy withdraw and get another one up pronto. Stupid stupid. Look, even if they confirm him now, they are going pay with it with fewer votes from suburban women. It's kind of like as Rick Wilson says Everything that Trump touches dies.
by artappraiser on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 11:40am
I wonder how all of Kavanaugh's personal friends who helped boost his nomination must feel as the drapes fall away from his secret life.
by moat on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 12:02pm
Brock long ago switched sides. I'm not aware of evidence suggesting he has any illusions about what today's GOP is about. To the contrary. More than most he long had a front-row seat to observe what the reality was beneath the public facade and spin.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 11:36am
Dreamer, your post from Brock:
The GOP groomed Kav, employed him, nominated him, put him on the DC Appeals court, and nominated him again for the Supreme Court.... it's not Kav who "expects people to believe he's changed his stripes", nobody expects Kav to change, the Republicans are counting on it he does not change.
They don't give a crap about misogynistic behavior (see .... Trump) except as it might effect the upcoming election.
by NCD on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 12:25pm
You don't think they give a crap if it sinks this nomination? That's the point I was trying to make. Even if they will never get why this should matter to them apart from politics, if it matters for their political goals they may start to pay attention, for those strong self-interested reasons.
by AmericanDreamer on Thu, 09/27/2018 - 12:48pm