MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Timothy Rammers @ ScreenRant.com, Feb. 2
Facebook says it has shut down the group page that was recruiting members to help sabotage Black Panther‘s Rotten Tomatoes score in an effort to alter the public perception of the film. Following the exciting debut of the character played by Chadwick Boseman in Captain America: Civil War in 2016, fans are only two weeks away from the Black Panther solo movie and the anticipation is already at a fever pitch. Early reactions to Marvel superhero extravaganza have been overwhelmingly positive, and fans are clearly hyped, too, as the film is projected to pull in at least $120 million (and as much as $150 million) in its opening weekend.
Despite all the positive vibes about Black Panther, a specter of negativity has been looming over the film in the past couple of days. It began Wednesday when word surfaced that a group claiming to be DC fans said they were organizing an effort to storm Rotten Tomatoes to trash the film’s audience score as revenge for the low scores that DC Extended Universe’s films have received on the site. And while director Ryan Coogler said he wouldn’t let the trolling effort affect him, Rotten Tomatoes stepped up in an effort to prevent people from meddling with the film’s audience score on its site. Now, in a further effort to prevent the anti-Black Panther initiative, the people behind the social media platform where the movement began is taking action [....]
Comments
i was led to find the above after googling about the film, after I happened across this simply amazing, jaw-dropping video:
by artappraiser on Fri, 02/02/2018 - 8:10pm
Facebook did the right thing here, but Facebook is no longer trustworthy. Facebook will be an open conduit for the Russians in the 2018 elections. Facebook allows Britain First, a white supremacist site, to have a place on its UK pages. Facebook and Twitter allowed Russian bots to promote a campaign to release the Nunes memo. Facebook is not taking its responsibility seriously.
https://www.recode.net/2018/1/31/16955432/democrats-congress-adam-schiff-dianne-feinstein-russia-release-the-memo-bots-trolls
There are several websites that I access through Facebook. Trying to disconnect from Facebook once your are on is almost impossible.
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 02/03/2018 - 11:53am
I think what the main article should remind people of is that Facebook is not a public utility, it is a for-profit company. When they choose to censor something, they have a profit motive in mind. So I looked at what they did here and to me it seems they opted to prop up the integrity of movie rating systems on their site and others like Rotten Tomatoes, that they genuinely reflect one vote per user and not a hack attack to artificially inflate one site over another. Not doing so could cause artificial "buzz" or viral activity to take off that doesn't reflect reality. So then no one cannot depend on what they see, i.e., investors, analysts, or just a schlump trying to decide if a movie is worth paying for, etc.
Our Constitution however felt a little differently about freedom of speech and it's not clear yet whether it should be interpreted to limit one passionate point of view advocate more powerfully than their numbers by technical means. How is spamming any different than having advocates on the street day after day after day handing out printed handbills and harassing all passers by. The principle of freedom of speech actually includes people becoming so obnoxious about their passionate beliefs that they turn the majority off.
It's an interesting conundrum.
Edit to add: this principle also has to do with the integrity of all the rating and review systems on the internet we have come to rely upon as consumers, not just about movies but large purchases and important services like health care.
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/03/2018 - 5:50pm
A private company can set its own speech regulations with certain limits
https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/27/politics/first-amendment-explainer-trnd/index.html
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 02/03/2018 - 8:28pm
I was reading some of the tweets about this and thought it was a joke at first. This is sad!
by Danny Cardwell on Sat, 02/03/2018 - 9:15pm
Abraham Reisman @ NYMag did a long form piece profile on Blank Panther's creator for the Jan.22-Feb.4 print edition:
The Man Who Made Black Panther Cool Christopher Priest broke the color barrier at Marvel and reinvented a classic character. Why was he nearly written out of comics history?
I have no idea how the character plays out, why it is so popular, I don't follow comics, but I have a suspicion from reading this piece it is because it not the same old same old. Priest clearly does not cotton to political correctness and loathes the idea of being a black token or creating black tokens. Some excerpts to that effect:
by artappraiser on Sat, 02/03/2018 - 9:15pm
Yeah, I end up more often than not with a negative reaction every time I see this "first black...", "first female...", etc. - like, I'm a grownup, I can notice that there haven't been a lot of black CEOs of Google or Apple or black hockey players & golf players - the pointing it out so much cheapens it, marginalizes it, or ghettoizes it - are black writers & directors only good for Blaxploitation and House Party and Beauty Parlor for the ladies, flicks about blacks or are they simply artists who happen to frequently but not necessarily have this milieu because most people write more what they know? *British* writer Kazuo Ishiguro writes *novels*. Not Japanese novels, not British novels - novels. V.S. Naipaul wrote insightful *travel books* - not Indian travel books, not British travel books, not Hindu travel books. Amos Tutuola wrote folk tales - not African folk tales, but folk tales set in Africa. Anyone can read him, Malaysians, Kazakhs, New Zealanders, Peruvians. He is not owned, he is not limited. He wrote "My Life in the Bush of Ghosts" in 1954 - was there any reason he *wouldn't* inspire a British glam & New York punk/indie performer 25 years later to make an album based on his book, and incorporate an African ethos into their stage performance?
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 02/04/2018 - 4:52am
The anticipation about Black Panther in the black community in the black community is a direct response to the lack of movies that are truly black oriented. It is a joy to see the reaction. Movies like Hidden Figures show triumph over obstacles. Movies like Driving Miss Daisy are insulting.
There is room for Black oriented moves by black writers and direct. There is room for black writers and directors creating universal movies. We are still in an age where Idris Elba appearing as an Asgardian in Thor was greeted by racist objections. There was similar nonsense when Amanda Stenberg. Was cast as Rue in Hunger Games. There is also a debate that white directors helming black- themed films take jobs away from black directors. Another big problem in Hollywood is that casting directors don’t consider black actors for race-neutral parts.
People may realize that blacks aren’t in certain positions, but silence does not change things. There was a lack of black coaches in the NFL. People knew that black coaches were absent. It took pressure from black activists and Dan Rooney, the former Pittsburgh Steelers owner, to force NFL owners to interview qualified black coaches with the Rooney Rule.
I have my Black Panther tickets and plan to enjoy the show. Early reviews are very positive.
http://variety.com/2018/film/news/black-panther-early-reactions-1202681362/
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 02/04/2018 - 9:43am
Following the adage that all publicity is good publicity, the whole gambit was counter-productive, encouraged previewers that liked it but wouldn't normally bother to rate or review @ Rotten Tomatoes to go and do so:
‘Black Panther’ Reviews Roar With 100-Percent Rotten Tomatoes Score @ HuffPost
and probably also encouraged a mindset to see it positively from the getgo.
by artappraiser on Wed, 02/07/2018 - 3:32pm
There was built in excitement for the.movie. Pre-sale tickets set a record. The white supremacists probably had little impact. The black community was thrilled about the character and the movie. There was similar joy when the movie “Get Out” was released. Older blacks had to settle for only white superheroes. Characters like Black Panther, Luke Cage, and Black Lightning appearing onscreen is a recent phenomenon. “Get Out” is a great horror film. “Black Panther” seems to be a great superhero movie. They are universal stories, but we are not used to seeing black characters as the leads in such notable movies.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 02/07/2018 - 3:45pm