MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The water crisis in Flint, Michigan has been going on a lot longer than people have been hearing about it. The residents of Flint had been drinking contaminated water for well over a year before any one even bothered to hear them out, let alone try and fix the problem.
After complaints were finally heard, some hope came to the citizens. In early 2016, President Obama declared Flint a national emergency and dispatched military to distribute clean water to residents. That was months ago.
The initial surge was a great relief for the people who lived there. They had finally been heard and were getting drinkable water. Based on the lead-contaminated water they had been forced to deal with, this was a huge improvement. However, passing out bottled water to residents is not a viable long-term solution, and long-term damage has already been done.
The Starting Point
Way back in April of 2014, Flint made the decision to be thrifty. The town thought it would be a smart, simple move to switch its water supply from the costlier Detroit water over to the Flint River. The city was struggling financially, and it needed some kind of interim solution while a new pipeline was completed. This action should have saved the city about $5 million over two years.
The problem was the water the city had been getting from Detroit was pretreated, and the Flint River was not. The city failed to add in the proper chemicals that would treat the water as effectively as it should have. This resulted in two major problems.
The first problem was not all the bacteria was killed, and coliform bacteria was found in parts of the city. Residents in those areas were advised to boil their water, and other areas were told it was still safe to drink. There was also discoloration due to rusty pipes. That in itself isn’t particularly dangerous.
However, the rust wasn’t the only thing coming off the pipes. The water was corrosive enough that the pipes were leaching lead into the water supply, and people were beginning to be affected.
High lead levels were first detected in early 2015, but they weren’t high enough to violate EPA standards. Part of that may have been due to how the water was being tested. A “pre-flush” system was in place, which could effectively disguise how much lead was in the water. It took another year of complaints, videos, protesting and increased illnesses before anyone did anything. This is despite the fact that several red flags had been raised since 2014, and those should have been enough to attract attention.
The Aftermath
The river water damaged Flint’s pipes so much that they are still leaching lead. Even though the city finally switched back over to Detroit’s water in October, 2015, Flint’s water is still considered undrinkable. The pipes are already damaged, and until they’re fixed, there’s nothing to be done for it.
Additionally, there are all the people who were impacted. It’s still up in the air how many children may have been affected by the lead in the water. There’s also an investigation going on to see if the Flint River water contributed to an outbreak of Legionnaires Disease, which has so far killed 10 people.
All of this means that there is no easy fix for Flint’s water. There is a plan developing, but it’s not going to be quick or easy. The government is going to have the infrastructure damages repaired, which will require a massive overhaul of the piping system.
Meanwhile, all that can be done is advise people not use the water and continue to distribute bottled water and water filters. It’s estimated repairing the groundwork alone will cost about $1.5 billion. In addition, there are estimated to be about 6,000 to 12,000 children who may have been affected by lead poisoning. Lead can cause a multitude of issues, including behavior problems, anemia and learning disabilities.
The end result is as many as 12,000 children may have had their futures damaged, and all the city can do is pass out water filters. It’s not enough. Quite frankly, it will never be enough.
Comments
Not many people will be interested in Flint's problems now that the hysteria has passed and Mike Moore has had his meds adjusted so he is no longer terrorizing the children and adults in Flint.
I did notice that some of the worst hype of the crisis is still being propagated when actual accurate data is available. The Virginia Tech team discovered that about 25% of Flint's homes had elevated lead in their water, some extremely elevated, but that means that about 75% of Flints homes had no problems with lead in their water. Luckily for even those residents the cloudy rusty appearance of the water soon after the switch to the Flint River water forced them to not drink the tainted water and most avoided the lead that was in some of their home's water.
The recent hearings on the Flint crisis in Washington revealed, if i remember correctly, that about 250 children have been documented as being exposed to elevated lead levels from this water and I have seen reports of two children who are being treated for extreme lead levels because of this regulatory failure. This data correlates with the work Dr Hanna-Attisha has been doing in Flint and her request for $80k to treat those children actually poisoned, those children with lower elevated lead levels will not need treatment.
The 12.000 children you mention is a pure speculation and i think it comes from United Way who are trying to ride this crisis to raise $100 Million for their corrupt charity.
by Peter (not verified) on Wed, 04/13/2016 - 3:20pm
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Peter. I'll definitely look into that data that you provided.
My biggest concern is that this is unlikely to be the only case. The government has consistently failed to act swiftly in these matters, often with state senators looking out for their own wellbeing and hefty chunks of change before those of the people that they are meant to be serving. A delayed apology and seemingly little action is just insulting to the people of Flint at this stage of the game.
by hollywhitman on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 8:52am
The government response to this crisis was a failure at all levels local, state and federal but that seems to be how our system responds these days, poorly if at all. Informing people about the factual dangers of lead exposure is important and necessary but there was a huge amount of politically driven hysteria and misinformation dumped on the people of Flint after the government neglect and foot dragging left them frustrated and seeking aid. This hype and misinformation had mothers of unaffected children in Flint blaming health problems their children had on lead that they didn't have in their bodies. When someone as well known as Mike Moore states repeatedly in the media that every child in Flint has been poisoned and will have lifelong problems the people there don't know what to believe and this creates panic and unnecessary fear.
The dramatic reduction in children's exposure to lead in the US in the last thirty years is a success story but there are still problem areas especially in bankrupt depopulated cities such as Flint and other distressed urban areas and they existed before this crisis was caused by a stupid regulatory decision not to treat the Flint River water for corrosion. The lead pipes that need to be replaced, in Flint and elsewhere, are those remaining taps from the city water mains feeding homes and they are being replaced but there are also lead pipes from the meter to the residence that are the responsibility of the property owner and i don't think the government can legally pay for that private remediation but they may offer low interest loans.
by Peter (not verified) on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 11:19am
Peter frequently drops by pretending to have read bogus studies that he refuses to provide links to allow the supposed studies to undergo analysis. He will then try to present some bogus conclusion that is easily dismissed. Here he boldly states that children will not have to be treated because low levels of lead are not problematic. The actual science notes that there is a decline in IQ with every single digit increase in lead concentration from 1-10 micrograms per deciliter.
http://www.lead.org.au/fs/fst28.html
Peter has a free speech right to his opinion, but the opinion expressed here is disconnected from scientific fact.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 04/13/2016 - 3:46pm
Having volunteered at a children's hospital some years ago and witnessing the first-hand effects of lead poisoning, I can attest to this.
by hollywhitman on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 8:53am
Links can be useful and informative,RM but you apparently didn't read or understand what this link was discussing or how it didn't relate to the Flint crisis directly. The studies discussed were from the era when 'chronic' elevated lead exposure was common in many urban areas of the US from leaded gasoline, paint or water and the acceptable levels of exposure were at least twice what they are today. Most of the affected children in Flint were the victims of an acute incident of exposure and weren't exposed before or after this year long incident. Most of them will not be treated because the lead will be excreted from their bodies rapidly but they will be monitored to insure they are not being chronically exposed from another source. The few children who were exposed to very high levels of lead are being treated to flush the lead from their bodies and they may or may not have lasting effects from this incident.
by Peter (not verified) on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 11:47am
There is impact of lead at all levels.
Please provide a link to how long lead stays in the body after exposure.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 11:58am
An actual expect says that the water in the entire city of Flint is unsafe. Filters are suggested for adults. Bottled water is recommended for pregnant women and children.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/0...
i don't know what personal pathology would lead someone to downplay the risk of the poisoned water in Flint.
by rmrd0000 on Fri, 04/15/2016 - 9:50pm
I never downplayed the crisis in Flint just attacked the ignorance, hysteria and hype about what actually happened and is continuing to plague the people there. I think that anyone who trusts that the water is safe to drink, without further treatment, in any major US city is foolish.
You link to another report and again you don';t seem to understand why these restrictions continue for the whole Flint water system. The reason the whole system is quarantined is that the experts don't know which residences still have lead feeder pipes and it could be more or less than the 25% i saw reported earlier. They just don't have that data and as long as the small sampling they are doing shows a high percentage of elevated lead levels they are required to warn everyone to treat or avoid the water even though many if not most of the residences in Flint have no lead in their water.
The extra treatment that is being used on the Detroit water now used in Flint is aimed at re-coating these lead pipes to reduce the lead levels in these residences' water and a flushing regime is planned for the whole system to speed this process so the system can be certified by the EPA as 'safe' according to national standards.
The program to identify and replace these lead pipes is a long term project, ten to fifteen years, but in the mean time the system must be brought back into compliance, by using a treatment regime, so the water system can be certified.
by Peter (not verified) on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 12:41pm
Please provide a link that says corrosion prevention systems are not being used in Flint.
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 2:18pm
I should have written 'treat' by filtering at the tap for individual residences and the water is being doubly treated, once by DWSD and again by the Flint water works for corrosion and to re-coat the lead pipes.
by Peter (not verified) on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 7:33pm
Re-coat already corroded pipes? Can you give a citation for that?
by CVille Dem on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 7:48pm
I do not have any citation but in a local news segment on my Public Radio station they said old houses in this area [mine is well over a hundred years old] the notoriously hard water leaves a buildup which becomes a protective coating on the pipes which prevents lead leaching into the tap water.
by A Guy Called LULU on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 8:20pm
It's true that naturally hard water will deposit minerals that help in the sealing of the lead pipes but the water authorities also add, i think it's phosphates, minerals to more quickly coat the pipes and that is what is happening now.
The corroded pipes CVD is referring to, i think, are the majority of the pipe in the system which are made of iron/steel and were degraded by the corrosive water which produced the iron rust visible to consumers soon after the switch to Flint River water. That problem seems to be decreasing while the lead leaching is decreasing at a much slower pace.
by Peter (not verified) on Sat, 04/16/2016 - 10:33pm