Foster Friess & viagry for the larynx.

    This past week has seen such an outburst of psychologically disturbing sexual and gender references by old white men---and for that matter, old white women---well connected to the socially conservative Republican Party that I have been puzzled as to what chemicals might have been put into their water supply---but I doubt that it is estrogen, because estrogen would presumably make men effeminate and cause prostate cancer whereas the outburst has seemed more like an overdose of testosterone.

    Last night I watched the movie, "Code 46", starring Tim Robbins who plays a fraud investigator in a Totalitarian state. One of his disarming techniques is to invite anyone, say a receptionist, to tell him something about themselves, anything at all, and see if he can guess their innermost secrets---which he does. Turns out Robbins has at his disposal an empathy virus which puts his insightful instincts on overdrive. Republicans have apparently found a drug which transforms normal and healthy sexual instincts into self-deprecating, and somewhat angry, sexual fantasies which---in an anatomical flip flop---are expressed through the vocal cords. Not knowing the actual chemical makeup of the drug I refer to it as Viagry for the Larynx, or, VFL.

    Forster Friess was most likely one of the early adopters of VFL. Typically the users are old men, or old men in their own minds---like Rick Santorum. In normal conversation about the economy or sports, VFL is dormant. But when an older man, like Friess, is confronted with an attractive woman like Andrea Mitchell, especially when a camera is involved, the larnyx is stimulated and out comes a 1950's high school men's locker room joke, the flip side of which is an old white guy who is now past his prime---and the reality of which is that he can still talk a good game.

    But in his case, Foster Friess did not necessarily ingest VFL prior to his interview with Andrea. My instinct is that his comments were well planned to keep the media's attention on Santorum focused upon cultural issues. The Republican consultant, Steve Schmidt, has the view that social conservatives have little appetite for an attack by Romney on Santorum's culture issues, so Romney must try to attack in areas like earmarks and votes to raise the debt ceiling. It follows that any culture issues which suck up the pundits' air time takes attention away from Romney's intended messaging and is therefore a good thing for Santorum. Not to mention that Santorum's base voters are vehemently anti-main stream media. 

    In my opinion, a guy like Friess does not use national television without a specific game plan. Perhaps he considered the possibility that Andrea herself would over-react, which would have accomplished the same purpose. In any event, the standard playbook of walking the comment back, apologizing, etc., is all prescribed. Santorum keeps his focus with the base he needs and can even segue to the media victim ploy, allowing him to throw into the mix Reverend Wright and possibly a reference or two to the election of 1860. The fact that Santorum is by and large writing off the female vote in the general election is secondary and can be dealt with later. The immediate goal is to tank Romney in Michigan and Ohio where more than likely Viagry has already been leaked into the water supply.

    It was clear that social conservatives of both genders who were in front of microphones last week had all been ingesting Viagry for the Larynx. The ladies in the New Hampshire HR were prime examples and gave us such gems as "use of the pill has created estrogen in the water supply and is a cause of prostrate cancer in men."

    Or the lovely admonition, "If you people want contraception you need to try condoms or abstinence". I wonder when this woman last had an empathetic thought in her head. 

    The testimony of the patrician and stove-up religious leaders paraded before Issa's committee exhibited the effects of ingesting VFL---except that these men are already so predisposed to misogynistic views, and they have certain parts of their anatomies so far in-grown, that they themselves need only quarter-doses of the drug. And in their cases, an aspirin between the knees might do little else than perhaps help them pee straight. 

    Any American who does care about religious freedom ought to be terrified at the easy complicity of those five men in a trumped up charade about religious persecution. Imagine them with even more power under a Santorum Presidency. 

    I am insulted by the comments of Foster Friess in whatever context one wants to put them. And the kind of angry, misguided rhetoric being spewed forth by social conservatives is in my opinion dirt for the mind much more so than anything which can be ascribed to Hollywood or the degrading social T.V. programming of Murdoch's News Corp. But the stupidity being thrown against the wall by social conservatives this past week is just the tip of the iceberg if, God help us, someone like Rick Santorum gets the nomination or were ever to reach the Presidency. 

    Foster Friess, in my opinion, does not give a hoot one way or another about outlawing contraception. As long as women in his family can buy contraception somewhere in the world, it's not an issue. What is an issue with Friess is somehow getting Santorum nominated by the Republican Party, and by a fluke, elected and used as a puppet for whatever regressive economic and social policies he actually does desire. If Foster Friess reads the media game as well as he did last week, he might well succeed in getting Santorum into the White House. Then VFL, and aspirin between the knees---like most other prescriptions in the Republican playbook---will be reserved as drugs for the little people.

    Comments

    Exactly Oxy, Foster Friess can help the women in his family buy contraception, abortions, etc, because he has the money. Men and women like Foster Friess  never associate a larger policy issue, i.e. poverty, access to adequate care for underclass, fair and equal coverage requirements for women, etc, he just made a joke out of it. It is kind of a billionaires gone wild scenario, they fund a campaign and are given a voice within that campaign, a large enough voice to be called to speak on the air primarily for the campaign, and instead of taking an issue seriously you make a lame assed joke, signifying how little value that particular campaign has for women.

    All Santorum can say is he doesn't speak for me. Except he kind of does since he put all that money into a SuperPac that advocates for Santorum, and we all know money talks... so...

    But Oxy, seriously, you don't really think Santorum can be elected nationally do you?


    If Santorum is the nominee there is always a chance he could elected but it would take a black swan event that I don't even want to contemplate.Smith said he is inelectable. 

    Obviously if Santorum is part of a brokered convention, Friess will have enormous influence, as well as if S. is nominated. 


    Doesn't Foster Friess sound like some frozen Aussie beer on a stick?


    Is that some kind of a weird take off on aspirin between the knees. Are you taking Viagry?wink


    I know Foster Friess and his Brandywine funds and, while at Forbes, had something to do with the nice things we said about his considerable investment acumen.  Oxy, I think you're right that this is not simply the case of a guy who lost control of his verbal faculties.  Yes, that can happen to anyone.  But it's not in his character.  I think that Josh Marshall is correct when his people report that some GOPers, whether they be backers or officials, believe that a new culture war is the way to go against Obama in light of a (finally!) improving economy.

    What gives me pause is that I want to believe that influential Republicans would rather fight about culture because the culture, at least between now and when I was in high school, has become notably more liberal.

    In a world where people finally recognize that same sex marriage does not make Jesus cry, I welcome a new culture war.


    Destor I gotta render unto you the Dayly Line of the Day Award for this here Dagblog Site; given to all of you from all of me for this gem:

    In a world where people finally recognize that same sex marriage does not make Jesus cry, I welcome a new culture war.

    Jesus has so much to weep about in a world of 7 billion people; half of whom have no chance to realize much of anything from this life.

    Well put!

     


    Seconded.


    Thanks, Destor. I also agree with Josh Marshall. The pundits are focusing on the fact that Santorum is tanking himself as far as the general election is concerned but I think a saboteur is only focused on the job at hand---like getting the nomination. If he doesn't get that, the next step is irrelevant. 

    But I agree, if culture war is inevitable, we'll hit them with every last ounce of energy and determination. I will not live in a Theocracy without a damned big fight. 


    I wonder if these uber rich fools realize the long term damage they are doing to the GOP and their candidates. They have a terrible misunderstanding of who the citizens are in this country. They have misread what the voters want done and the intelligence of the general population. There is no walking back from that after they have nothing but damaged their candidates in the primary.

    I just read the latest Glen Greenwald article at Salon. This is about a rich supporter of Romney and his tactics. In away it ties into this theme of rich guys over influence in this primary. This Guy is a real bully and the article is worth a read. I can't do a link with this android.

    Thanks, Trk. Foster Freiss would make Dick Cheney look like an amateur. 


    The most uncreative satirical piece I've read in years. This is pathetic. I don't sympathize with anti-feminist and abstinence ideologies in politics but your garbage has gone much further than that to put words in these conservatives' mouths. If this is how you function on a day to day basis then you apparently have no hope to reconcile your extreme views with the world around you. 


    If you have what you believe to be a strong counterpoint to this blog, then I urge you to write and post it.  It's all too easy to critique, hit and run per se, but only rhetoric without merit unless you can and do respond with specificity and valid points to substantiate your stance.

     


    Thanks, Aunt Sam. I don't get the part about putting words into conservatives' mouths. They said those things themsleves, and obviously it was the Viagry what did it, not me. 


    Thanks, friend. And "uncreative satirical" will definitely be entered into the Oxy Mora family archives. 


    Anonymous please go back to Rupert Murdochland or Hate Radio where you can feel comfortable and unoffended by the comments of 'conservatives' about victory mosques, half-Kenyans who apologize for America, Presidential birth certificates, death panels, the war on Christmas, how low income strawberry pickers tricked Wall Street and caused the housing crash, why we need more tax cuts for the rich and less regulation of Wall Street, how a consumer protection agency is bad for America, why we should go back into Iraq, how climate change is 'political science and a partisan conspiracy for world government, and how theology should be used as a basis for government policy.


    Thanks, NCD. He has no sympathy with anti-feminists but he goes nuts when I quote conservatives who do have such views.

    I was driving in Texas today and stopped behind a 10 year old Tahoe with a man driving and a woman sitting next to him. On the lift gate window was a sign. "New Company Policy. We are not going to spend, or hire, or invest in our business until OBAMA IS GONE."   Slice of life. 


    Doesn't that sticker's statement translate to, 'turning off the water to spite their thirst'?

    People choose to be ignorant.


    Right. I don't know what the point of it is in Texas, they're preaching to the choir. Maybe they think they can stall the economy.


    We get the beat up sunburnt paint peeling dirty 90's Saturns with the W 04 sticker still hanging onto the rusty bumper, another transient wayfarer from the Midwest. You wonder, what did W ever do for them? Send their kid to Iraq? Crash the economy? Save a stem cell somewhere?


    But when an older man, like Friess, is confronted with an attractive woman like Andrea Mitchell, especially when a camera is involved, the larnyx is stimulated and out comes a 1950's high school men's locker room joke, the flip side of which is an old white guy who is now past his prime---and the reality of which is that he can still talk a good game.

    Exactly how it struck me, great description.

    In my opinion, a guy like Friess does not use national television without a specific game plan.

    This is where I totally disagree with you! I think just the opposite.  He is a classic old fart CEO type of guy (or gal--Marge Schott?) who is used to saying whatever is on his mind and having all the "yes sir" folks praise every word, because no one ever ever dares suggest anything he says might be wrong or even a faux pas, except perhaps a wife of longstanding, if he has one. If he has a new trophy wife, not even then, because she would know to praise everything that comes out of his mouth as brilliant, funny, whatever, or she is outta there. I doubt he thought twice about what he was going to say on teevee, he figured they wanted some of his pearls of wisdom as everyone he knows has always treated his every word . To sum up: no one has ever probably told him: you talk and act like a stupid ass even though most people who know him probably think exactly that.


    Driftglass agrees AA:

     .....now, to the horror of their wranglers, these full-body moral lepers -- from the Kochs to Freiss..............are using the force of their riches to bankroll the Loud Public Blabbing of all the loathsome lies and casual bigotries that are the Mother tongue of the Party of God, but which the Republican brain caste and most the the Villager Media have spent a generation trying to cover up.
    Because crackpot wingnut billionaires -- who are used to shooting their mouths off to room's full of toadies and lickspittles who will agree with any batshit nonsense that comes out of their boss' pie hole -- just don't fucking care....


    There is a sizeable group of these right wing wealth concentrators who are operating in the wings, people you don't hear of much, like Carl Lindner, etc. 

    Think of the travesty of this, The Kochs, Adelson, Friess---each backing a horse in the race. It's unbelievable. And of course the individual campaign contributors are nil.


    Thanks, Artsy. I agree, this is the way these guys normally talk. And we'll never know, but he's spending a lot of his own money and I don't think it was accidental. The guy is a winner, and right now he's winning. The criticism rolls right off his back. 


    BTW, Alice Stewart, Santorum's spokesperson, in an interview with Andrea Mitchell referred to Obama's
    "radical islamist policies". Then later, called back into the show an said that she mis-spoke, meant to say "environmental" instead of islamic. Right. Same playbook, imo. Gets attention, dog whistles to the base, sucks up air time, mission accomplished. 


    And now he is so happy, he's gonna take two Viagra tonight and not worry about the Church's objection to 'spilling seed' for any reason other than to create life.

    Had to be said. Or not. But bet it's true.


    Well, I think you have hit on the nub of the problem. Now, in the absence of satire, I really don't begrudge this man, or anyone, especially later in life, a romantic life. I would be willing to bet that every woman in his immediate family has used contraception. I assume some of them might actually be concerned that his backing of a religious autocrat like Santorum might lead to actual loss of their freedoms as women. The reality is of course that people of wealth have recourse to solutions that little people do not have. 

    The first thing that is maddening about Friess, and he's certainly not the only one, we have the Kochs and the Adelson couple also, is that he is single handedly supporting the front runner of the Republican Party in a race for the Presidency of the country. That fact should terrify any citizen, whatever their stripe of politics.

    Secondly, imo, the primary motivation of a man like Friess, based upon his enormous business success, is the continuation of the practices which got him there and the desire to maintain his fortune among his heirs after he leaves this earth. I think a democracy needs a strong estate tax system to prevent further wealth accumulation by oligarchical families but I understand the urge from a psychological point of view. What incenses me is that I think Friess is exploiting, through Santorum, the wedge culture issues for the ulterior motives of finance and family and the little people will get very little in return, except a charade of concern about their wishes.

    Power is what Friess wants and he has the means to increase it. If Obama is re-elected Friess would actually suffer very little negative impact, except that he will have played a good hand, and lost that particular round. But there is always the next one. I fear for our country when a single puppeteer can have such influence. Without his money, Santorum wouldn't even be in the race. 

    In short, because of his wealth, he and his family will keep their freedom. But the rest of us would be denied ours. 


    Oxy, Your statement:

    '...because of his wealth, he and his family will keep their freedom. But the rest of us would be denied ours.'

    needs to be sent in as a campaign slogan against Rick, Myth or whoever gets the GOP nomination.  Because all will strive to deny civil and human rights to Americans.

    Succinct, profound and delivers the true message.

    The truth is that their power comes only from their wealth and because of their socio-economic status they are 'inoculated' against most of the ills that plague the 99%.


     two Viagra 

    Two!


    Thanks for the very original haiku!


    Latest Comments