MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Comments
copied from Part I
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 6:05pm
commentary related to topic by Sinema & AOC
I believe this is partly reference to the work by the House Problem Solvers Caucus (which is truly bipartisan, having equal number of Democrat & GOP members listed here. Here is their announcement of "Building Bridges: A Bipartisan Physical Infrastructure Framework" from June 9.
Then see
On the following AOC tweets, do note Sept. 2 date:
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 6:30pm
What s it that Sinema wants taken out of the bills?
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 2:36pm
Not interested in doing your work for you if that's what you want to figure out.I believe you with the Infrastructer bill youhave to compare the bipartisan plan from the Problem Solver's Caucus site with the Democratic plan. And as far as the budget bill I never understand those and don't plan to start.
She's still tweeting about it:
LET ME BE CLEAR: I am not interested in political activist debate and attacking individual senators like you are. I am only interested in figuring out what Senators are up to in general.
I am seeing a trend of lot of them acting independently from party, and in a bipartisan fashion. That is interesting to me as it is the role the founders thought they would play: basically a grownup counter to the rowdy, populist, partisan House.
If you can find someone to bitch about with as regards individual senators ruining your expectations, you are welcome to do it with them on this thread, it's just not going to be me. I have no use for that kind of input. Especially on a little place like dagblog where no one is going to change minds and there is no one with power reading. That strikes me as absurd.
I'm not here to defend any of them. I just very much dislike inaccurate political activist spin on what they are actually doing, that doesn't help me understand anything about reality.
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 3:09pm
I simply asked for clarification on what led her to hold up the bills.
Regarding bipartisanship, it seems the "bipartisan" Republicans are willing to risk the financial status of the country by refusing to address the debt ceiling.
You see adults in the Senate, I do not.
Edit to add:
There are so many "adults" in the Senate that President Biden is floating the "nuclear option" as a carve out to address the debt ceiling.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/05/biden-nuclear-option-standoff-mcconnell-515222
So much for bipartisanship
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 3:47pm
Regarding political activism
I criciticized two Democrats and I criticized the Republicans.
Edit to add:
You are tied to the illusion of bipartisanship
You are blind to the efforts of Republicans in state governments to be able to overturn the results of a legal election
Simultaneously, Republicans are gerrymandering to suppress votes.
Since only one viable political party believes in Democracy, I'm proud to be a Democratic Party member.
I can still criticize Democrats for failing to pass bills that counter voter suppression and push for police reform.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 8:16pm
Deal with it: I'm with the 41%. You partisans are with 29% vs. 29%
https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 8:49pm
I'm comfortable with the numbers. If the Democrats can't get legislation that addresses voter suppression, a pox on their house.
If the 41% are ignoring an attempt to put authoritarians in office, I'm glad that I am with the 29%.
You are winning, why so upset?
Edit to add:
Machin will not support the proposed votings rights bill because there is no bipartisanship
https://www.npr.org/2021/06/08/1004341661/despite-constructive-meeting-manchins-mind-is-made-up-on-voting-rights-bill
Sinema voiced similar objections
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/25/politics/john-lewis-voting-rights-senate/index.html
Manchin offered a watered down version of the bill, but there is zero proof that he could find 10 Republicans to go along with his bill.
https://www.vox.com/22537146/joe-manchin-voting-rights-for-the-people-john-lewis-act-gerrymandering-voter-id-democrats
If I'm in the 29%, nothing happens. If the 41% prevails, nothing happens. I'm good.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 11:06pm
Your straw men thing again and absurd at that. I say I don't want to argue with you.
No where do I say I'm upset. You invent that I am upset.
I tell you if you want to argue, you are going to have to find someone else.
You, on the other hand post all kinds of angry stuff about Manchin and Sinema and are looking for someone to defend them so you can debate that person.
I don't "support" or defend the work of any politician or party, they have to ask for and win my vote and if elected, they work for me not the other way around.
I analyze what they are doing and what smart political operatives are saying about them.
I might defend something to do with personal attacks on them, but even then, my mistake, as who cares about the personal opinion of a pseudonymous person on Dagblog, really?
One thing I really don't want to do is spend time debating with people like you who do the straw man thing consistently and don't seem to understand English sometimes. Life is too short to waste it on such things.
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 11:03pm
No anger stuff, just facts.
I noted why bipartisanship is a farce in many cases.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 11:08pm
I'm with the 41%.
Get real, most independents aren't actually independent. The 41% probably divides into 15 15 11. You might be with the 11%
by ocean-kat on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 11:25pm
The Republicans are working to suppress votes.
They are making moves in states to guarantee that only Republicans can win
I have no problem being with an 11% that fights for fair elections, if that is a true number.
Striving for bipartisanship for bipartisanship's sake is idiotic.
LBJ got civil rights bills passed
Democrats got clobbered
Obama got health care passed
Democrats got clobbered
The current GOP has made it very clear that they will not play well with others
Tim Scott made Cory Booker look like a sucker when it came to police reform.
If voting rights or police reform bills pass, Democrats will be punished
If infrastructure passes, Democrats are still likely to lose seats.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 10/07/2021 - 2:09am
The opposition party fights like an opposition party - horrors!
(not that benign, but still - if we play like pussies we're gonna get rolled)
Bernie takes to the press to pressure Manchin and Sinema - good for him - puts it out in front of voters, not just the politically inclined.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sanders-reconcilliation-manchin-sinema-va...
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 10/07/2021 - 2:20am
Just a few recent examples of promoting bipartisanship; there's plenty more:
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 7:00pm
On Liz Cheney & Krysten Sinema by senior columnist at The Daily Beast:
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 7:07pm
from Andrew Yang's Oct. 4 essay explaining why he was leaving the Democratic party and registering as an Independent (To be clear: he did not recommend for everyone at the current time because in many states one ends up disenfranchising oneself at primary time. But he is going to be working against political party primaries and advocating for ranked choice voting instead.)
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 7:22pm
For those with thick skulls: the majority dislike fucking partisanship! -
The majority just doesn't care about those labels anymore! Used to be you come from a long family line of voting Democrat or Republican. NO MORE. Gone with the wind.
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 11:08pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 11:13pm
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 4:04pm
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 4:07pm
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/06/2021 - 4:23pm
Interesting - here's what real declared Independent Senators can do. They don't have to pretend they are part of one happy party that says all the same things!
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/07/2021 - 2:18am
Already put this video from yesterday on another thread but it belongs here more. The one true Independent in the Senate and the guy who acts like he is one:
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/19/2021 - 8:01pm
So at least one more registered Independent Senator, maybe two. No surprise to me.
I'd love it if they were ALL Independent, then they'd be fulfilling what the Senate was meant to do.
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/20/2021 - 7:29pm
Though if Trump's influence slowly recedes and something like this becomes an actual possibility in the House, they might indeed unfortunately become Republicans.
About the only good side effect--and even that went bad in many instances--of Trump winning the presidency was a realization that party elites of both parties were not running parties that represented the feelings of the entire electorate. Mho, two big tent parties are no longer adequate. Actually, we shouldn't even need them in this day and age.
There is no such thing like in the past, where families voted one or the other for generations and loyality to party is passed down. Everyone decides for themselves using the internet, like it or not. The parties are obsolete, that's why they are having such difficulties courting different demographics.
It's been interesting to see the effect of ranked choice voting experiments as well as seeing experiements of very local elections being run non-partisan, with no party affiliation...
by artappraiser on Wed, 10/20/2021 - 7:49pm
Great point Matt:
Excepting I did note the big news that a trans person was made a four-star "admiral" in our public health bureaucracy which makes apparently makes a ot extreme identitarians extremely happy, is throwing them a bone, but over which I think WHOOP DE DO! But is "they" planning to do anything about the problem of a lot of lowest common denominator work over there?
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/19/2021 - 9:16pm
"the 1st X in Y to do Z", hooray!
Yeah, i was expecting a massive revolution in healthcare, and instead it looks to be reshuffling call centers and chat boxes.
2001 was more ambitious.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 10/20/2021 - 12:51am
He's mystified by her, so the writing on topic coincidentally results in a deep dive into many angles of Senatorial politics that is really helpful:
Kyrsten Sinema Is Confounding Her Own Party. But … Why?
By Nathaniel Rakich @ FiveThirty Eight, Oct. 11
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/21/2021 - 2:17pm
really worth a watch - Cornyn announces that he's going to help out the missing Feinstein with a "present" vote (on a judicial confirmation) and several of the rest of them talk about how they used to do that more often
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/21/2021 - 6:30pm
the way Biden remembers his work in the Senate of 1994:
by artappraiser on Thu, 10/21/2021 - 10:21pm
very good question:
I would maintain that the whole idea of the Senate was to have a "cosmopolitan bias", to counter the "bunch of rabble rousing yahoos" nature of the House. Not necessarily to be liberal in political philosophy, but to be the educated, temperate grownups. (See "House of Lords".)
by artappraiser on Sat, 10/23/2021 - 3:27pm
Except for the attention seeking wannabe celebs like Cruz, who act more like House members, I think this is also the case with a lot of Senators
which is mainly what this thread is exploring.
by artappraiser on Sat, 11/06/2021 - 3:12am
Cheney & Kinzinger get down on Sen. Cruz for his rabble rousing bullshit:
by artappraiser on Wed, 11/17/2021 - 4:52pm
Kinzinger continuing a serious harangue on Cruz, who, it should be noted, doesn't know how to fight back except to deflect with more silly partisan accusations:
by artappraiser on Wed, 11/17/2021 - 9:15pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 11/19/2021 - 7:22pm
New poll says nearly 3/4 of Arizona Democrats don't want Sinema as their Senator.
BUT Overall, 42 percent of Arizona voters view her favorably and 45 percent view her unfavorably. So that means a lot of Independents and Republicans are happy with her, to balance out all those unhappy Dems,
So that means if they primary her and put up someone more economically "progressive" than her, that person will have a hard time winning against a moderate Republican, and --
Democrats could lose their one-vote majority rule in the Senate just by that one action.
by artappraiser on Thu, 12/02/2021 - 7:39pm
MITCH & CHUCK NOW GET ALONG!!!
by artappraiser on Thu, 12/16/2021 - 7:05pm
by artappraiser on Mon, 01/31/2022 - 2:32pm