You are mistaken. I have linked other articles on the same and related subjects but this contains additional reporting which in my opinion should be in the news so I reinserted the link to the article shortly after you [apparently] deleted it.     

You have again made clear in your response that I probably do indeed “hang around” online with at least one idiot who probably does drool when he quits frothing.  Your unsupported insult to the article, which makes it obvious that you want everything about it to be disregarded without any consideration, begs a lot of questions.   The report I posted from an independent site which actually does not get attitude influencing financial support from government sources uses the very same method to make its case that Bellingcat does to make its various cases. It is a legitimate but not infallible method of gathering data which can be used legitimately or otherwise as evidence to create a picture of what is going on or has gone on in the past.  Bellingcat is good at what it does but there is good reason to believe that what it does in fact do, does not include even intending to give a complete, and certainly not an unbiased, account of events that it reports on. Evidence supporting that assertion is based on the same kind of connect-the-dots-from-publicly-available-data method that Bellincat itself uses.  Connecting the dots presented by the Greyzone reporting in this instance paints a clear picture and makes a strong case, as others also have done, that Bellingcat is a willing and enthusiastic tool of U.S. and British propaganda. That does not mean that everything  Bellingcat reports is wrong, that is not the nature of effective propaganda. Being always ‘honest’ to its own subjects is not the nature of any government. Is there anyone reading this that does not understand that entities of the U.S. government and various other powerful interests do in fact engage in a great deal of propagandizing and that a great deal of their propaganda is aimed at the people of the U.S.  While I do believe that there are people in every field working honestly and with integrity, does anyone doubt that when money and/or an exalted position are offered for any purpose regardless of that purpose's merit or effect, it will find some taker happy to hire on to carry out that purpose? 

 I don’t want to be too dramatic, but we love this,” said Marc Polymeropolous, the CIA’s former deputy chief of operations for Europe and Eurasia referring to Bellingcat’s reporting/propaganda.  

  To the extent that propaganda is used in ways that justify the negative connotation of the word, I like to see it exposed for what it is, or at least to have the evidence given a fair hearing.