MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The Sanders-inspired grass-roots group ‘Our Revolution’ is flailing, an extensive review by POLITICO shows, fueling concerns about a potential 2020 bid.
By Edward-Isaac Dovere @ Politico.com, May 21
[....] An extensive review of the Sanders-inspired group depicts an organization in disarray — operating primarily as a promotional vehicle for its leader and sometimes even snubbing candidates aligned with Sanders. Our Revolution has shown no ability to tip a major Democratic election in its favor — despite possessing Sanders’ email list, the envy of the Democratic Party — and can claim no major wins in 2018 as its own.
The result has left many Sanders supporters disillusioned, feeling that the group that was supposed to harness the senator's grass-roots movement is failing in its mission [....]
Comments
Plenty of fodder here for the Bernie-haters to rejoice over.
I just finished, and was distinctly unimpressed, with Crashing the Party, a short read by one of Bernie's key people in 2016. It conveyed a contempt towards dealing with "technocratic" details over policy proposals, and nuance generally (you're either a Bernie supporter or an establishment/corporate Dem--there is no grey), and a penchant for score-settling even while denying as much and usually not mentioning names of individuals. It was written at what felt like about a 2nd grade level. It was embarrassingly insular and naive in failing to see any apparent legitimacy in any differences of viewpoint or actions coming out of the Clinton camp.
Clearly it was not written for and with people like me in mind (admittedly probably very small in number), who are highly sympathetic to many parts of Sanders' project and to him even while maintaining criticisms and disagreements with his program and approach. I thought the book was generally just very light on content and did not deliver on its implied promise to focus on where Sanders and the movement he has inspired goes from here, at anything more than a superficial level. There is almost no evidence of reflection. The one exception is an acknowledgement that the campaign might have done a better job, earlier in the process, of connecting with concerns of people of color. That would be an understatement in my view. From my standpoint the Sanders campaign had far more to say and advocate that would help address many of the major issues impacting people of color in our country than the Clinton campaign.
I am, on the other hand, impressed by some (not all) of the fellows on the staff of the Sanders Institute. Stephanie Kelton, notably, has real technical chops and the Sanders crowd really needs more such folks if they are going to maximize their influence over policy agendas and outcomes. Not all of the pushback they get is from people hostile to the main outlines of their project. Some of it reflects legitimate disagreements and sincere and completely appropriate questions, which they should be at pains to listen and respond to responsibly in lieu of just throwing rocks at people. The best part of Crashing the Party was the introduction by Adolph Reed, whose work I am looking into more.
by AmericanDreamer on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 11:02am
How did you get an advance copy of the book?
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 11:09am
The scheduled release date for the paperback was May 1. I picked up a copy in a bookstore recently.
by AmericanDreamer on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 11:18am
Thanks, I thought it was later this month for the Kindle version.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 11:31am
Ask Stephanie Kelton what happens if/when China has a bigger economy and instead of propping up our spending spree, they decide to ask for austerity (like we do of others via World Bank, IMF, etc.).
I'm rather tired of economics with a pony, not that I think what we're doing now is the best we can do.
As for the pamphlet you describe, I wonder if it's on purpose to keep Democrats divided. I think *everyone* was sympathetic with most of Bernie's causes, and the issues were doability, ramifications, political repercussions, etc.
I mean, as soon as you give people $15/hour, landlords and shopkeepers and health industry/insurance folks will start raising their prices to take away any surplus they can - that's just the way they work. So it's great saying we'll fix problems with X, but we have to consider whether X will actually fix it and not make problems worse - overall or in certain critical cases.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 11:40am
FWIW I strongly disagree with that. There really are different values, different visions, different assessments of our current situation, what could/might/must happen, how long we have, different problems and risks different people are willing to live with. And they do not break down at all cleanly along Clinton-Sanders tribe lines in my estimation, no matter that some see it that way and seem heavily invested or self-imprisoned in doing so.
You weren't the only person commenting who misinterpreted what I wrote, which was nuanced, that thing some of you here say you like so much and want to insist on, except maybe on the matter of the Clinton vs. Sanders tribes. Where, for some apparently, it's white and black, the forces of sober responsible reason, pragmatism, and intelligence vs. the forces of the great greedy unwashed, something-for-nothing riffraff who have fallen for dark evil or soft-minded utopian, but certainly ignorant, yahoo "populism"--no distinctions made. For others, in the other camp, it's, well, any of you can fill in those blanks just as well. The competing narratives are self-evident, right?
by AmericanDreamer on Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:42am
I've no idea what you're talking about - you lost me. More concreteness, please...
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/23/2018 - 12:13pm
It conveyed a contempt towards dealing with "technocratic" details over policy proposals
Sounds familiar. History teaches there's often not a lick of difference between the results of populism of this kind whether executed by passionate ideologues or an egomaniac dictator. The angel is often in the details.
Yeah bureaucracy sucks, but is it really impossible to keep on its ass?
by artappraiser on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 9:11pm
Bernie Sanders is running for the Democratic nomination in Vermont — but he won’t accept it if he wins. The move makes it virtually impossible for another Democrat to seek the party’s nod.
The famously independent senator... officially announced Monday that he would seek a third term in the Senate this fall. He also said that he’ll pull the same maneuver that he did in his 2006 and 2012 Senate races: Running as a Democrat, declining the nomination when he wins and then running as an independent.
by NCD on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 2:28pm
Democrats ran Joe Lieberman and Sanders.
Suckas!
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 2:49pm
Second top official resigns from Bernie Sanders group
A co-vice chair of Our Revolution who accused the group of insensitivity toward Latinos parts ways in the wake of a POLITICO report.
@ Politico.com, Updated 05/24/2018 12:26 PM EDT
by artappraiser on Thu, 05/24/2018 - 9:54pm
"If Democrats are having a civil war, nobody told the voters", Dana Milbank, WaPo op-ed today:
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 3:22pm
"Populists and progressives are the Democratic establishment now" - huh? care to explain? What's happened to those dreaded "centrists" and cursed "neolibs" - earth just swallowd them up?
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 4:04pm
That was one of my reactions/questions on reading the piece as well. I'd be interested in how Milbank would respond.
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 4:41pm
It's Milbank's article, so I think how he'd respond is fairly evident. He's a not-to-far leftist and likes to think that the Democratic party is moving in his direction, so naturally he believes ... what he said.
by barefooted on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 8:52pm