MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Now, pretend for a minute that you’re a 50-year old white man living somewhere in the Deep South. You cast your first vote for Ronald Reagan in 1984. As a kid, your favorite show was the Dukes of Hazzard, which featured a car called The General Lee. The backdrop to every party or prom you’ve ever attended was the music of Lynyrd Skynyrd (with lyrics like “In Birmingham they love the governor”).Today, your way of life is under attack -and this (by far) transcends the Confederate flag. You’re experiencing what feels like a radical cultural revolution.
Where do we go from here? After the last ten days or so, it's hard to imagine.
Comments
Let me be the insensitive one here. For the last 150 years, we have bowed to the sensitivity of white Southerners When the Southern Heritage of the Confederate flag is discussed, we are talking white Southern Heritage. black lives never mattered. Southern Heritage has told us lies for 150 years. After losing the Civil war, Southerners were appeased. We allowed them to keep their dignity. Jefferson Davis did not hang as a traitor.yet, if blacks talked about slavery, they were told to stop dwelling on the past. We cannot go through this Confederate nonsense for another century. Time to end this now.
Despite the written evidence of the leaders of the secession movement declaring slavery as the reason for leaving the United States of American. Southerners could lie about the Confederacy not being tied to racism. Next came the flag shuffle. The argument was the battle flag was not the official flag. That was only because there were a multitude of flags used by Confederate forces.Black Conservative Ron Christie notes, the Confederate battle flag was used in Pennsylvania. Jefferson Davis made clear that any white Union commander that had black troops would be executed.. This was the command of a racist. Black troops knew there would be few left alive or that they would face enslavement.Next we were fed the lie of organized black Confederate troops. Records of these organized, armed troops is nonexistent Southern Heritage is used to excuse racism. lastly, blacks are told that they need to be aware the other blacks sold them into slavery. somehow this fact ismade to impart shame. If black heathens sold blacks to white heathen Christians it just says that evil comes in many forms. Lies and diversions and a refusal to acknowledge the evil committed in the past cannot be what southern Heritage stands for. True white Southerners have been working for change, they are the ones who need our support.
If you read the linked article, you find that the hypothetical white southerner also disagrees with the marriage of two same-sex people who are in love. What concessions do Gay couples "owe" this gentleman?
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 7:50pm
I will retract the careless words "well documented". Data for one camp or the other is sparse.
by Aaron Carine on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 10:51pm
Please find the documentation of black Confederate soldiers listed as members of regiments in on your Google of the African-American Encyclopedia.
There is documentation of non-combatant servants
There was a mulatto unit in Louisiana that became a unit in the US Colored Troops after blacks escaped slavery and free mulattoes fled to avoid being canon fodder for the South. The unit was disbanded and left to fend for itself.
During the final weeks of the war, there may have been a disjointed attempt to muster black confederate troops.
Please provide non-Confederate, non-anecdotal data.
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 10:06pm
Okay, this is a hotly debated topic, and data is scarce, but there is some evidence for Black soldiers. There is no reason to reject Confederate sources. They should be our main sources when researching this matter(who else would know more about the Confederate army than the Confederates?)
http://www.scv.org/documents/genworks/RoleofBlacksConfederateArmy.pdf
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2011/09/black-confederates/
http://californiascv.org/Did%20Blacks%20Serve%20in%20the%20Confederate%2...
by Aaron Carine on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 10:50pm
Aaron here is a line from Stauffer's Harvard lecture
The above represents a prisoner, not a soldier. Here is the line on the mulatto units that never went into battle. Others switched sides as I noted above.
Note the other problem is that Stauffer notes that heard that Fredrick Douglass was told there were black armed Confederates in 1961. If these black Confederates were commonplace in 1861, why was there Confederate debate about enlisting black troops in 1864? It makes no sense.The idea of black Confederates uses historical jiggery-pokery methods to distort facts. These mythical black troops appear nowhere in Confederate records.
Here is a takedown of the Harvard. Lecture if you want to believe in black Confederates and Santa Claus, feel free. Produce Confederate records documenting the existence of these troops.
by rmrd0000 on Sat, 06/27/2015 - 11:29pm
I don't want to believe in black Confederate soldiers, although I do want to believe in Santa Claus. I just say that it hasn't been settled(I retracted my thoughtless "well documented" statement; that was my bad). At least one of the sources I cited referred to what he claimed were records; maybe he's snowing us; I don't know
Sober people don't say black troops were commonplace; Stauffer's estimate of three thousand is a tiny number, since nearly a million men served in the Confederate army. I'll see if I can find records, although I don't think eyewitness testimony should be disregarded. Maybe there were no black soldiers in the Confederate army, but it's still being debated.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 7:15am
Climate change is being debated as well. Good luck finding documentation that the Confederates enlisted armed slaves into their ranks.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 9:32am
I thought black soldiers--if the Confederacy ever had any, and maybe they didn't--were free. At least one of the sources cited what he claimed was documentation. Also, I don't think rmd is justified in dismissing eyewitness testimony and statements by Confederate officers as worthless.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 9:56am
I dismiss Confederate anecdotes because Confederates lied about what the war was fought to what the flag represents. I request documentation.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 10:05am
In 1861-65, Confederates weren't lying about what the war was about. They were candid about it being about slavery. That they denied this years later isn't any reason to reject what men said they saw with their own eyes. I'm going to look for documentation when I'm able to get to the university library. But I'll probably have to rely on secondary sources, because the library doesn't have a trove of Confederate documents. I'm getting tired of saying that one of the sources cited what he said was documentation. I don't know whether or not there were black Confederate troops; I'm going to see what evidence I can find, but if historians haven't settled this question, I won't be able to.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 10:31am
In the final weeks of the war, the Confederates did try to enlist Blacks. The bill passed by the Confederate legislature did not include freedom as a result of service, there is no evidence of organized black troops under leadership of specified Confederate officers fighting anywhere. The Confederacy, even in its last desperate days was not about to free any slave.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/confederacy-approves-black-so...
Here is the law allowing enlistment of slaves
Keep in mind this law passed just weeks before Lee's surrender. Going by the Confederate law, black troops couldn't have been legal before a couple of weeks before surrender. The Confederacy would have had limited time to arm and trade the slaves. The slaves would have remained slaves if the Confederacy were victorious.
Organized black Confederate troops are a myth.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 11:25am
Who said the Confederacy was going to free slaves? I didn't. There could have been free black troops before the government authorized drafting slaves. Until I have been to the library, there is nothing more to say.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 11:37am
From your initial condescending post, I thought that you had done a review of the issue in the African American Encyclopedia. I guess not.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 3:15pm
I read about it in the African-American encyclopedia; I'm not sure what you mean by a "review" of it. Whether I am condescending is for others to judge. Some may find rmd's dogmatic certainty on this matter somewhat haughty.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 3:26pm
There are a plethora of encyclopedias that have African Americans as the topic. You offered no link to your source, so it seemed like a dismissive response.
I'm not dogmatic. I'm documenting my sources and pointing out the flaws in yours. The Confederate law allowing black troop enlistment was signed mere weeks before Confederate surrender. Fact, not dogma.
Good luck in the "university library".
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 3:45pm
The law you are referring to authorized conscription of slaves. I'm talking about the possibility that free blacks may have been in the army. So the law is neither here nor there, as far as this discussion goes.http://www.freedmen.umd.edu/csenlist.htm
You haven't exactly pointed out flaws in the sources; you've just said that they are all crap. And the scare quotes in your last sentence indicate that you have already decided that any sources I find will be worthless. That is dogmatism.
I don't know what the truth of this matter is, but I am going to find out all I can about what historians are saying.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 8:07pm
See below
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 8:45pm
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 9:05am
Being mired in the past, ignoring or just overlooking the changes that happen is a trait everyone shares. Each generation wallows in it, and each generation has different mud. Most things that move us along are incremental enough to blink through, though when they pile up they can seem volcanic. Once in awhile the forward momentum stops suddenly ... making old shadows visible again. That's what has turned so much upside-down recently, and for good or ill we're all caught in the vortex. But as is often said in one form or another, we wouldn't be where we are today if we weren't where we were then.
There will never be a clear answer, because the question hasn't been fully asked. I don't know why it is, sometimes, that we see through rose colored glasses now what was blindingly ugly then. I don't understand when we do the reverse, either. For all the demand for truth, it doesn't feel like understanding is part of it. Yet, if we can't at least admit the possibility that every coin has a third side, we'll keep making mud.
"Sweet Home Alabama" was written as a sort of rebuttal to Young's "Alabama" and "Southern Man". Some of that push-back you mentioned. Years later, Neil Young wrote, "My own song 'Alabama' richly deserved the shot Lynyrd Skynyrd gave me with their great record. I don't like my words when I listen to it. They are accusatory and condescending, not fully thought out, and too easy to misconstrue".
by barefooted on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 2:58pm
by Anonymous pp (not verified) on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 4:58pm
Southern music, like it's people, cuts both ways and down through the middle. The state of Alabama is particularly popular - with lyrical praise/scorn and it's very own band sing'n "Song of the South".
Gone, gone with the wind ... ain't nobody going back again.
by barefooted on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 5:40pm
by Anonymous pp (not verified) on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 5:02pm
by Anonymous pp (not verified) on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 5:04pm
A bit simplistic could be the stock response when discussing the lyrics of any song.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 6:55pm
I'm gonna pass on pretending I'm a 50 year old "white" guy blah blah blah. And I don't think it is at all true, as Matt Lewis (who is a bit of a dick, incidentally) claims, that "putting yourself in the other guy’s shoes is a two-way street." However I do have a few words for our 50 year old caricature:
I'm sorry you were lied to by people you trusted while growing up. I'm sorry so many of the institutions you put your faith in turned out to be so rotten. And I'm sorry if you feel confused or defeated or bitter. But you don't get a pass. You don't have an excuse. For crying out loud, you're 50 years old. You should have known better at half your age. And look, if you're thinking, like Lewis suggests, that "progressive winners in this culture war want to punish their opponents," think again. It's just another lie. What so called "progressive winners" want and need, in fact, is help. Any time you're ready to join the community of people interested in creating and nurturing a better world for everyone, bring it on. Otherwise, sit down and STFU. You're in the way and we're running out of time.
by kyle flynn on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 6:44pm
It is amazing that Matt Lewis would tell blacks to grow up, stop complaining about slavery and the Civil War, and move on, yet seeks compassion for the people stuck in praise of a racist flag.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 8:02pm
Is that what you took away from the article?
by barefooted on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 8:09pm
Look. At the limited concerns he heard from the Conservative Black Chick and the long list of aggravations assigned the theoretical white Southerner. The black woman worried about a highway named after the Confederate President and the flag on state grounds. The white Southerner had a whole host of gripes. What did you take from the article?
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 9:02pm
It's a fairly shallow article by someone attempting to explain a stereotypical southern white man. So I suppose what I took away from it was more the idea if even stereotypes aren't inherently evil, maybe the real thing deserves a break. Rather than repeat what we know, I think it was a weak challenge to consider what we don't.
Not all southern whites are bigots with the Confederate love of slavery in their hearts, rm. It's as unfair as thinking all southern blacks are poor and uneducated. I know you see the world differently than I do - but the beauty of real progress is that we can talk to each other. And maybe put the caricatures to rest.
by barefooted on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 10:25pm
I see the bigots as bigots. No one believes that the wingnuts are the only whites out there.i was pointing out that Matt Lewis took more care in describing the fictional white guy than the real black woman. I speaks more about Matt Lewis than the fictional white guy.
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 10:43pm
The linked piece is 'both sides' claptrap by a GOP consultant, Matt Lewis. He gets paid to keep the culture wars front and center, and The Base fired up enough to vote.
There are two types of Republicans, co-conspirator hucksters, and willing dupes who buy the GOP malarkey, who have, with Fox News indoctrination, slipped irretrievably beyond the event horizon of wingnut reality deniability. (see Fox News guest says Charleston murderer product of the Left),
Lewis is the former type.
No one is taking away TV's, music collections, personal guns or flags, and the South lost the war 150 years ago. Those most impacted are long gone.
The proverbial 50 year old guy would be better off watching less TV News, it's a nearly worthless product delivered by millionaire corporate executives whose mission is to keep viewers focused on Caitlyn or Rachel, not what goes on in the power centers of the nation and government.
by NCD on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 1:15pm
by Anonymous pp (not verified) on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:40am
by Anonymous pp (not verified) on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:30am
Conservative white Southerners are the leaders of movements to suppress black voted. They are the ones who tell the lies about the Confederacy not being about slavery. The are the leaders of anti-Gay organizations. They will continue to fight back. Progressives are ready to move on, it is Conservative white Southerners putting up roadblocks. Watch the continued resistance to voting rights. Watch the ongoing efforts to limit healthcare expansion. Progressives are not the villians.
Blacks and Progressives already have excellent relationships with white Southerners who are capable of living in the 21st century.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:11am
Aaron, here is your own John Stauffer looking at Black Confederates, slave and free. They ran for the Union lines at the earliest opportunity.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2015/01/black_confederates_not_a...
Edit to add:
When you go to the university library, you should be aware of did information about black Confederates that is being promoted by people with an agenda
http://cwmemory.com/book/black-confederate-resources/
by rmrd0000 on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 9:59pm
I thought this discussion was not about whether black Confederate soldiers deserted, but whether black Confederate soldiers ever existed. Stauffer says there were some until 1863. Is he right? I don't know, but I'll find out what I can.
by Aaron Carine on Sun, 06/28/2015 - 10:05pm
Find documentation that black Confederate troops existed anywhere in actual Confederate records. This would provide evidence that they were recognized by the Confederate military and don't represent anecdotal sghtings. Thanks.
Edit to add:
See if there is anything comparable to the databases for United States Colored Troops
http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/usct/usct-united-states-colore...
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 8:29am
I'm going to look for documentation, but I don't accept the view that anecdotal evidence is always worthless. Those witnesses probably saw something, and statements by Confederate officers about who was under their command should carry some weight.
I regret the bitterness that has crept into this discussion, and I hope we can clear it up.
I'm having trouble tracking down the book I skimmed ten years ago(there are a number of African-American encyclopedias) so I shouldn't have mentioned it. I'm going to stick to sources I actually have in front of me.
by Aaron Carine on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 1:45pm
The anecdotal stories of value because many of them carry the taint of being doctored by organizations like the Sons of Confederate Veterans. Slave graves are given headstones provided by the SCV so they can be labeled Confederate Army soldiers. I will need more than anecdote.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 2:37pm
If we have evidence that a witness accounts was fabricated, that is one thing. Simply dismissing them all as fabrications a priori is not legitimate.
by Aaron Carine on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 2:49pm
I think all you will have are anecdotes.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:00pm
Next you'll be demanding a handwritten letter authored by a black slave soldier pledging his undying loyalty to the Confederacy - dated within months of the start of the war, notarized and accompanied by scientific documentation of ink and paper period dating.
Then again, that would be anecdotal.
by barefooted on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:00pm
The problem here is that there has been a steady pattern of labeling slaves as soldiers. Read passages from John Stauffer cited above. Stauffer himself notes that many "soldiers" literally had a gun to their heads. These men were still slaves. The slaves ran for the Union lines when possible.
Edit to add:
If men were enlisted in the Confederate Army, it does not seem unreasonable that there is documentation of enlistment
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:07pm
Your documentation request is not unreasonable, rm. It's your increasingly narrow parameters of what you'll accept that is.
by barefooted on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 3:21pm
It is narrow because there has been much disinformation. I don't trust anecdotes without documentation. If there were organized black troops under the leadership of confederate officers let us see the proof. Isolated pictures of slaves with guns are insufficient. They could have been holding the guns for their masters. Many so-called soldiers were slave brought to the battlefield by their masters. Given the amount off effort put into labeling slaves as soldiers, why should my narrow criteria be rejected?
Edit to add:
The scenario about black Confederates is the same scenario we see with the Confederate flag. You blame people who call out the lies about the Confederate flag as wanting revenge on the South. Historians who point out holes in the story about black Confederates are said to be unwilling to accept that blacks served under the Confederacy. They turn skepticism into denial of facts. When you ask for documentation about black Confederate enlistees, you find no documents. You are then told to trust anecdotes.
OK, show me the anecdotes, I'll see if they have been found wanting by other historians.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 4:18pm
I don't know if rm is right that there are no documents at all. That is one of the things I'm going to try to find out. I think oral accounts have some value, although less if they are recorded long after the event. Forty years later, former Confederates may have had an interest in embellishing, and their memories would have been imperfect.
by Aaron Carine on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 6:59pm
BTW
Could you provide a link to the Amazon or other source so we can known which The African-American Encyclopedia you read?
Edit to add:
Use the Google and enter "The African American Encyclopedia" and see what turns up. Are you talking about a 20-year old tome?
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 10:29am
A Confederate Law authorizing the enlistment of slaves came less than a month before the collapse and surrender of General Robert E. Lee in April, 1865.
Confederate Law Authorizing the Enlistment of Black Soldiers, as Promulgated in a Military Order
ADJT. AND INSP. GENERAL'S OFFICE,
Richmond, Va., March 23, 1865.GENERAL ORDERS, No. 14.
I. The following act of Congress and regulations are published for the information and direction of all concerned:
............
By order:
S. COOPER,
Adjutant and Inspector General.
by NCD on Mon, 06/29/2015 - 12:35pm
The Sons of Confederate Veterans have been one of the groups promoting the existence of black Confederates. They find no connection between racial hatred and their beloved flag. They distance the flag from the massacre in Charleston.
http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/HaireoftheDog/archives/2015/06/22/sc-...
Here is a link to a takedown of the above nonsense by a person who has followed the misinformation put ou by the SCV
http://cwmemory.com/2015/06/24/black-confederates-to-the-rescue-again/#m...
The truth is the Confederacy thrived on rounding up black people at Gettysburg and slaughtering black Union troops at places like Fort Pillow and Crater, (see above link).
I live with black Republicans today like Clarence Thomas who waxes about dignity in slavery and the inability of two loving people to marry, and Ben Carson who finds Obamacare akin to slavery. I don't pull out my hair because they exist. I wouldn't be embarrassed if black Confederates were real. The problem I have is that there a lot of lying liars promoting black Confederates as a convince for a political position.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 06/30/2015 - 10:39am
Here is the hilarious response of the SCV to the classic TV miniseries "Roots". They had a book written about black Confederates and asked people for stories about black Confederates because "Roots" made the Confederacy and the South look bad.
http://cwmemory.com/2011/07/31/the-influence-of-roots-on-the-black-confe...
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 06/30/2015 - 10:53am
Thanks for the links. Maybe O'Reilly can write a book Killing Slavery, on how black Confederates freed the slaves and saved the nation.
My eyes glaze over on anything written or spoken by Republicans.
They are hucksters and liars whose mission is keeping the willing dupes of The Base hopping mad, voting and convinced they are the victims.
Carnival barkers are a more honest breed.
The same white racists the Republicans have exploited for 40 years, 'the southern strategy', were still taking their families to lynchings until the 1940's.
Some are burning black churches today.
For a disturbing presentation of 20th century white racism and violence see Flash presentation on lynching postcards/photography at Without Sanctuary.
by NCD on Tue, 06/30/2015 - 12:44pm
What is amazing is that when you call out crap like that handed out by the Sons of Confederate Veterans or others, you are treated like you are the one with a chip on your shoulder. It cannot be that you realize that Confederate supporters have lied for years about the Civil War. The South was not handing out freedom if you joined the Confederacy. Confederate soldiers committed war crimes against black Union troops, freedmen, and escaped slaves
I'm aware of Without Sanctuary, but thinks for the link.
One thing I will be working on as a post is the issue of black Confederates and Southern Yankees. The Southern Yankees are those Southern White who supported the Union and the terrors they faced. There is actual documentation about the abuse of Southern Union supporters.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 06/30/2015 - 2:26pm