Danny,
.

You asked, "Is There A Spiritual Path To Reason?" The answer is an unequivocal no, because without reason the concept of spirituality is meaningless. Reason is the glue that holds ALL concepts together.  But if you turn your question around and ask, "is there a reasonable path to spiritualism?" The answer is absolutely. You see, the way you posed the question gives spirituality priority over reason, and nothing can be given priority over reason, because, by definition, anything that lacks reason, lacks validity. On the other hand, it is quite "reasonable" to use reason (or logic) to formulate a spiritual philosophy.

Reason informs my spirituality. I use reason to define God. "God is whatever force is responsible for what we define as reality." Thus, for me, God, Nature, and the Universe are one. So based on my definition that God and the laws of nature are one, that precludes ANYTHING from being "SUPERnatural," since nothing in nature can be superior to nature itself.

All of us believe something: especially those trapped in nihilism who profess not to believe anything.

As an atheist, I completely agree with you. (I know many atheists who would not, however.) One of these days I plan on writing a post about my particular "dogma". As a prelude, I'd suggest that my fundamental axiom is, "There are no supernatural events." (I think I can probably tease out one or two other axioms, but the rest of my "dogma" can be seen as corollaries of just a few small axioms.)

When I " hear Christians say we need a national religious awakening" what I think they mean is that they want the laws, rules, and norms of behavior to reflect their particular interpretation of the bible. That doesn't seem like spirituality to me but the desire to impose their views of proper behavior on other people. I disagree with the choices many Christians make when they decide which parts of the bible are important and which parts can be ignored. I certainly will not behave as they wish nor do I think society would be better if everyone behaved as they wish.

Many people have trouble saying, "I don't know" and living in a state of not knowing the answers to many important questions. The gap between the universe, how it works, why it is,  and what science has discovered about the universe is immense. Faith and belief is used by many to fill that gap. When science reaches an unknown people put whatever particular version of god they have faith in onto that unknown.

I don't think there is a spiritual path to reason but there are rational paths to spirituality. Yoga in its purest form, separated from the religions normally associated with it, is one of those paths. In the west yoga is usually practiced as stretching exercises but that's only one type of yoga, hatha yoga. There are many types of yoga.  The postures, called asanas, while often used here as exercise were not intended that way. Asana actually means, seat for meditation.

Yoga in its pure form is simply a set of practices. Spiritual teachers share those practices, what they experienced, and what they learned from them. They claim those practices will lead to spiritual awakening and enlightenment. But they are also clear that faith and belief in the things they say will happen or what they learned will profit no one. Only if one practices will one advance spiritually. Its much like science. Here's some experiments. Here's what happened and what people have learned when they did the experiments. Try the experiments yourself and you will have similar experiences and learn similar things.

While my spiritual path has been very important to me it was only peripherally connected with organized religion. As a mystic I looked for experiential knowledge of spirit. So while I may have chanted for several days with little sleep with Gurumayi Chidvilasananda in a Hindu temple it was the mantra yoga I was there for. I didn't have faith or belief in the stories and myths of the religion of Hinduism. When I went to the Lakota reservation to vision quest, do sweat lodges and sun dances the goal was what could be learned and experienced of spirit. I didn't have faith or belief in the myths and stories of the Lakota religion. For me to grow and advance spiritually it wasn't necessary for me to have any faith or belief in any of the stories in the books of any religion.

In fact often the book and the organized religion is an impediment to spiritual growth. My sister is a charismatic christian. From my yoga studies I could understand exactly what was happening as those around me began to speak in tongues and fell into trances. I've had similar ecstatic spiritual experiences. But while I understood and sought out similar experiences I could never fit in with those people. They took those spiritual experiences and subscribed to the book, and more often than not, those who told them what to believe and do because of the book. The experiences are an important and much neglected part of human consciousness and much can be learned from the practice. But they do not prove that Jesus is god, the bible is the inerrant word of god, and that all other religions are the work of satan. Just as having a spiritual wakening while chanting in a Hindu temple doesn't prove the Hindu holy books are true.

The questions you ask require some philosophy. Maybe more than a little.

If faith and reason are to be both mutually exclusive and yet have something do with each other, that is a certain way of talking about the universal. The way Thomas Aquinas looked at that question is very different than the way Calvin did. They both would have been comfortable reciting the Nicene Creed together, if time and place had permitted.

Kierkegaard explored the limits of an explicit psychology in the face of choices that could only be made by an individual in their time of making decisions. His register for the religious was accepting that the choice is bigger than the explanation of it.

One great thing about the Taoist tradition is their focus on the limits of any explanation of the best path. They don't answer your question because the two sides of the duality are a function of language instead of two things that are experienced as themselves. The tradition does not accept the natural confusion of the mind as an acceptable reason to stop getting better at the good things.

And then there is Socrates and his demand that the unexamined life is not worth living and the question of where that falls on the continuum between faith and reason.

I left out a lot of things but you probably get the idea.