Elusive Trope's picture

    My Christmas and Shabbat Offering

    Christmas and the whole holiday season stretching back into my teens has not always been exactly my favorite time of the year.  This is neither the time nor the place to go into all the reasons for this.  I would say this has something to do with the fact that I am not religious, and spiritual only through a lifetime of struggle to rise above the militant atheism of my youth.   I can remember one particular moment when this affliction born of a teen’s anger toward God began to finally melt.

    I was in community college in one of my first literature courses.  The professor had as one of the assigned novels Barrabas by Par Lagarkvist.  The novel itself followed Barrabas, after being released by the crowd instead of Jesus.  Here is a plot summary from wiki:

    Jesus is crucified on Mount Golgotha. To the side of the crowd stands Barabbas. Being a violent man, a brigand and a rebel, he cannot muster much respect for the resignation of the man who died in his place. He is skeptical about the holiness of Jesus too. Yet, he is also fascinated by the sacrifice and he seeks out the different followers of Jesus trying to understand, but finds that their exalted views of Jesus do not match his down to earth observation of the man. More importantly, since Barabbas had not ever been the recipient of love (the cornerstone of the Christian faith), he finds that he is unable to understand love and hence Barabbas is unable to understand the Christian faith. Barabbas says that he "Wants to believe," but for Barabbas, understanding is a prerequisite for belief, so he is unable.

    After many trials and tribulations he ends up in Rome where he mistakes the Great Fire of Rome as the start of the new Kingdom of Heaven and enthusiastically helps spread the conflagration. Consequently, he is arrested and crucified along with other Christians as a martyr for a faith he does not understand.

    But it was as much about the author.  I still remember the professor standing in front of the class and talking about how Lagerkvist called himself an atheist who was always in search of God.  Long story short, my relationship to religion, to the religious, to those struggling to find their faith and to those who have lost it, changed quite a bit in that short time we read and discussed that novel (some times literature and a liberal arts education does what we expect them to do).

    So…to the extent that this time of the year is a moment for reflection by those of faiths (or lack thereof), I offer this:

     

    St. Kevin and the Blackbird

     

    And then there was St. Kevin and the blackbird.

    The saint is kneeling, arms stretched out, inside

    His cell, but the cell is narrow, so

     

    One turned-up palm is out the window, stiff

    As a crossbeam, when a blackbird lands

    And lays in it and settles down to nest.

     

    Kevin feels the warm eggs, the small breast, the tucked

    Neat head and claws and, finding himself linked

    Into the network of eternal life,

     

    Is moved to pity: now he must hold his hand

    Like a branch out in the sun and rain for weeks

    Until the young are hatched and fledged and flown.

     

    *

     

    And since the whole thing’s imagined anyhow,

    Imagine being St. Kevin.  Which is he?

    Self-forgotten or in agony all the time

     

    From the neck on out down through his hurting forearms?

    Are his fingers sleeping?  Does he still feel his knees?

    Or has the shut-eyed blank of underearth

     

    Crept up through him? Is there distance in his head?

    Alone and mirrored clear in love’s deep river,

    ‘To labor and not to seek reward,’ he prays,

     

    A prayer his body makes entirely

    For he has forgotten self, forgotten bird

    And on the riverbank forgotten the river’s name.

          --- Seamus Heaney

    Comments

    I believe in religion. I just am not religious. Because religion is a fact.

    Some people who pray jump higher, hit baseballs farther, run faster, get over sicknesses quicker...

    Religion is a psychological state.

    It really has nothing to do with how old the earth is or how old the universe is or whether there is a trinity or not. These myths held by hundreds of millions of people simply provide a structure.

    I am here. But looking at pictures from satelite telescopes may tell us that there is no here exactly, there is no now exactly. That is scary to people who must KNOW there is a here and a now, exactly. It interferes with their ability to pray.

    I recently read a dialogue between Falwell and Robertson. It boiled down to their belief that Methodists and Anglicans were antiChrists.So they would desire their version of Protestant prayers to be said in our public schools but not the prayers of Methodists or of Anglicans.

    Most of us may like to pray that we will run faster and hit balls farther; but we cannot allow others to pray that they will run faster and hit balls further. Certainly not when they proceed to pray to a different God or in a manner that is different from ours.

    Watching geese fly south in order to escape winter is mystical to me. That is about as religious as I can get.

    the end


    Are all your ducks gone in your pond now for the winter?


    Oh yes Momoe. The ducks and most of the birds for sure. Already had -20 up here two and three weeks ago. Ducks are dumber in the south part of the state. I have told stories about that.

    But let me tell you, we have some birds who hibernate up here and the pigeons will survive.

    But the geese and the ducks are long gone or dead. ha


    Reality in the now = The geese are gone.

    Reason = They could be dead.

    Faith = They will be back.

    Gregor in the now = I don't know what that means!


    Looking out at the expanding universe, and the looking in the other direction, down past the protrons and neutrons, down til all there is are some dancing super strings vibrating, telling us that we not here and there is no now, and more dimensions than our minds can fanthom, folding into one another.  And they tell us our universe may be just one of many, like slices in a loaf of bread, and when two of them shall happen to touch...(big) bang!

    Better to just watch the geese fly south.


    That comment, and today's cold mixed with warmth, made me think of Dudley Randall's poem: http://poefrika.blogspot.com/2007/09/profile-on-pillow-by-dudley-randall...


    The Oxen

    by Thomas Hardy

     

    Christmas Eve, and twelve of the clock.

    "Now they are all on their knees,"

    An elder said as we sat in a flock

    By the embers in hearthside ease.

     

    We pictured the meek mild creatures where

    They dwelt in their strawy pen,

    Nor did it occur to one of us there

    To doubt they were kneeling then.

     

    So fair a fancy few would weave

    In these years! Yet, I feel,

    If someone said on Christmas Eve,

    "Come; see the oxen kneel,

     

    "In the lonely barton by yonder coomb

    Our childhood used to know,"

    I should go with him in the gloom,

    Hoping it might be so.


    yes, exactly.  thank you.


    Beautiful. Merry Christmas, Trope.

    Merry Christmas, Lis


    Tolstoy put it this way:

    "I shall not seek the explanation of everything. I know that the explanation of everything, like the commencement of everything, must be concealed in infinity. But I wish to understand in a way which will bring me to what is inevitably inexplicable. I wish to recognize anything that is inexplicable as being so not because the demands of my reason are wrong (they are right, and apart from them I can understand nothing), but because I recognize the limits of my intellect. I wish to understand in such a way that everything that is inexplicable shall present itself to me as being necessarily inexplicable, and not as being something I am under an arbitrary obligation to believe."


    Wonderful quote.  That Tolstoy fella was one sharp cookie.  Camus distilled it down a bit: "The absurd is lucid reason noting its limits."


    Those French guys certainly know their way around a bon mot.

    There is one difference between the expressions: Camus is appraising the Beauty from across the room through curling wreaths of smoke while Tolstoy marches toward the Beloved with a cup he filled from the samovar.


    Latest Comments