The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age

    Mr. Gingrich, bwana, what about Freddy Mac?

    The Swedish author Henning Mankel who created the "Kurt Wallander" series has written a novel about Africa, where he lived for twenty years. In "The Eye of the Leopard", a young Swede travels to Zambia on a two week trip and stays eighteen years. It is the late 60's, post independence, and the white farmers are carrying on their work in a dangerous and uneasy balance with the Africans. The country is a pressurized tank of steam ready to blow. The Swede takes a "temporary" job as the foreman of a farm but has never managed workers. 

    "How should I treat them?", he asks.

    "Firmly", the owner says. "The Africans are always looking for your weak point, those moments when you can be talked into something. Give them nothing; find something to complain about the first time they wash your clothes. Even if there's nothing; then they'll know that you make demands...."

    It is not hard to imagine bwana Gingrich in the role of the privileged farm owner. Following his quick rise in the polls Gingrich's messages quickly became focused on the degrading "southern strategy" of using coded messages for blacks and minorities to scapegoat them for the nation's ills. The strategy apparently appeals to a large part of the Republican base. "Poor people in the projects don't know about work", "they get their money from drugs", they'd make good janitors if you got them young enough. And of course, their leader, Barack Obama, is the best "food stamp President" we've ever had.

    Gingrich didn't intend to scapegoat blacks and minorities? Then you won't believe that this is part of the strategy either---that is, following his "poor kids as janitors" routine, he followed up with his own 12 year old grand daughter who "saved her money" to buy an ipad. You get the difference, right? Well, like I said, it's "coded". Bwana, can we clean the toilets now?

    What underlays the Zambian farm owner's stance is not just disrespect. It is a defense mechanism. The real issue is fear, that the country will explode and he will be murdered in his sleep. In the same sense Gingrich's stance of superiority---including the overt disrespect of minorities---is a defense mechanism designed to hide his vulnerabilities, not to a machete, but a more deadly weapon---the bad things that people don't already know about him.  

    Gingrich's real vulnerabilities---those things which people who thought they knew him but actually don't know because it's new information---are his lobbying efforts for a wide segment of special interests and especially Freddy Mac. The entire tea party-ish book on why Republicans were not responsible for the financial crisis because Democrats and Obama actually created it---by encouraging the bad practices of Freddy Mac and Fannie---that entire argument is undercut by Gingrich's relationship with Freddy Mac.

    Gingrich's quick pivot to the usual suspect-scapegoats was slick, apparently successful, and not only firms up the Republican right wing base but, more importantly, imo, leads his attackers away from the $1.6 million he received for carrying Freddy Mac's water. Gingrich's opponents need to focus on his own weaknesses and not the subterfuge he throws into the air around him like so much confetti.  

    There are some who think Gingrich's style of lashing out, the mean-ness, the unpredictability,---all would somehow throw Obama off in a debate. That belief in Gingrich's debate effectiveness imo undergirds much of Gingrich's support in the right wing. I don't think the right wing's belief in Gingrich's effectiveness would be borne out. To my mind McCain was a much better inside fighter and counter puncher than Gingrich would be, and McCain was handled more than effectively by Obama.  

    My take on Gingrich is that he is a powder keg with a short fuse. And I think his mercurial speaking style and his lashing out are best understood as defense mechanisms---all of which hide a world of vulnerability. 

    Bwana, got a match?

     

      

    Comments

    Republicans make life especially difficult for Black Republicans. The racially tinged statements that come from Limbaugh ("Michelle Obama's "uppiti-ness") or  Coulter ("our blacks") leave people speechless.

    Kiron Skinner , an African-American foreign policy wonk, has joined the Gingrich campaign as an advisor. Ms Skinner tries to cover for Gingrich's push to roll back child labor law's for poor Black/Latino children by stating the following:

    What he asked is how do we grow a culture of responsibility, a culture of saving and investment, when you don’t have that in the home. It wasn’t to finger poor children, or suggest children who come from more elite backgrounds perform better," said Skinner. "It was about how to provide a template when children may come from a home where someone doesn’t carry a briefcase or isn’t a blue collar worker. That’s what he was speaking to. It's leading to a national conversation: How do we help people dropping out of the system very, very early?"

    Did anyone but Skinner get that message from Gingrich's words? Gingrich's previous solution was to place black children in orphanages as a part of the Contract With America:

    Newt Gingrich, the soon-to-be Republican Speaker of the House, was eager to flex his muscle. Minor controversy erupted over remarks he made about welfare reform and orphanages. Some Republicans had suggested that the nation could reduce welfare rolls by placing the children of welfare mothers in orphanages. The idea was to prohibit states from paying welfare benefits for two groups of children: Those whose paternity was not established and those born out of wedlock to women under 18. The savings, according to this proposal, would be used to establish and operate orphanages and group homes for unwed mothers.

    The GOP has a major problem when it comes to dealing with the black community and black Republicans have decided that they will not have any role in challenging the GOP's biased rhetoric.

    For the GOP prison is a better option than education and orphanages are better option than working to repair families. The GOP does believe in government intervention when it means that blacks lose freedoms.


    Thanks for your comments. They publicly put out statements like Gingrich did and which are coded messages to the base that they "get it". Then they back track on what they said. The base knows the back tracking is necessary and overlooks it. Perhaps a few moderates will be smoothed over.

    Trump, whatever else he is, is most likely not a racist, as well as the fact that in his ilk in NYC it would be considered tacky behavior. So he quickly covered for Gingrich, coming up with a spur of the moment poor kid "apprenti" reality show idea. What a sickening duo---The Donald and the Newt. 


    I had a conversation with a Conservative at work who was pleased with Newt. I mentioned that Newt did his dissertation on the Belgian colonization of the Congo. Gingrich traveled to Belgium, but never went to the Congo to do his research. The dissertation was on the impact of colonization. I told the Conservative Newt's technique seemed to be as fraught with probable error as going to England to do a detailed analysis of the impact of the Revolutionary War on the former colonists.

    The response from the Conservative was the following, "We know all about Newt's dissertation, but we still don't know anything about Obama's dissertation." I mentioned that Obama had edited the Harvard Law Review. Conservative responded, "You know who else edited the Harvard Law Review? George Bush!" I noted that Bush never edited the Review. Conservative response, "Well Bush was on the staff of the Review".  He also noted that it wasn't important for Gingrich to go to the Congo because.....wait for it.....Copernicus discovered Pluto, but he (Copernicus) never went to Pluto.  Everyone got a great laugh out of that remark, and we left shaking our heads in wonder of what else lurked in his Conservative cranium.

    In a business setting, it is not considered polite to call a lying liar a liar in mixed company. I waited until he got to to his office and pointed out his factual errors about Bush and the Harvard Law Review, and Copernicus and Pluto (a story for another day. Google Clyde Tombaugh ).

    The Conservative merely put his head down and said, "Oh". Conservatives communicate via confabulation. He will go to bed tonight still believing that the other misinformation rattling around in his head is solid fact.


    Nicely written. I am very familiar with a situation in which a boss is berating an employee because he suspects she voted for Obama---whom he literally hates.  It's a dicey situation.

    Your story of the colleague who could imagine George Bush as being on the Harvard Law Review is startling in a way because it shows the absolute gap in perceptions between ourselves and those on the other side of the great divide. 


    I love how Gingrich's story about his Freddie Mac involvement is that he was using his vast powers as a historian to warn Freddie's executives about the mortgage bubble.  Because, I tell ya, when I need a complex pool of bundled home and consumer loans properly valued, I take it right to a historian, particularly one who writes popular histories and counter-factual novels with lurid sex scenes.

    The other day I was talking complex derivatives and CDS exposures with Doris Kearns Goodwin and I made a freaking fortune.  She told me some anecdote about how Lincoln and his cabinet didn't get along, on purpose, and so I shorted the Zimbabwe dollar using a synthetic index traded only through a dark pool in Luxembourg.  What insight these historians have!


    It's truly amazing what a good historian can do for a business enterprise. Especially a historian of consumer credit histories. I hear there are thousands of new jobs for history majors in the housing industry. Every real estate brokerage and appraisal company needs a historian. The history of neighborhoods, the history of construction techniques and the history of how to close a sale. Historians are second only to Philosophy PHD's in their appeal as new hires at major home building companies. Realizing that historians make the best CEO's, the Wharton Business School has cut finance courses out of its curriculum and substituted history courses.  


    That was a good book. Nice post.


    Thanks, Rootman. I personally relate to Hans Olofson more than I would like to admit. He had no plan, took an option that was simply there, and stayed with it for 18 years. 



    Thanks, Dick. Anita Ekberg in the jungle. Hmm. Bwana ain't so dumb.


    My take on Gingrich is that he is a powder keg with a short fuse. And I think his mercurial speaking style and his lashing out are best understood as defense mechanisms---all of which hide a world of vulnerability.

    Right now I am sort of focused on the topic of anxiety, and this has led me to look at anxiety and its role in politics.  Anxiety is the cousin of fear and its corresponding emotion of panic, in my opinion.  Fear is focused on a specific threat that is believed to be happening or will happen (e.g. another terrorist attack).  Anxiety is either focused on a specific threat that might happen (the plane I'm on might crash as opposed to I know we're going to crash!) or the possibility of some threat yet unknown to emerge (the impending doom on the horizon). 

    For many in the white population of this country, the black community represents a source of anxiety.  They are seen as a threat, but in what exact manner that threat will occur is ambiguous at best most of the time.  This makes it much more difficult to discuss, as opposed to say the threat of illegal immigrants taking away jobs which is seen as happening right now.

    At one time in my academic days, I focused on historical and contemporary South Africa during Apartheid.  There was a heighten state of anxiety among the whites - everything seem calm on the surface.  The black South Africans were by and large complying with the rules of the country.  But the whites knew there was something under surface - and how it was going manifest someday was unknown.  A sort of impending doom, the end to their way of life.  This "end to a way of life" anxiety is what grips many like Newt and those who feel aligned with him.

    Exactly how it will all unfold is not known.  But they sense.  It's right there beneath the surface.  A riot waiting to happening - kind of like the ending scene in Do the Right Thing.  Of course, if one asked these American whites to articulate what exactly that "way of life" is, they would probably stumble over their words and make no sense.  All they really know is that gnawing anxiety doesn't go away and they look to those like Newt to make it go away.


    I wish I had written that. You put in the exact thoughts which I was searching for but couldn't quite conceptualize to put the capstone on the post. I think we don't realize the anxiety that some people felt when Obama was elected. The ending of Apartheid is the perfect comparison. I think that anxiety fuelled the "tea party" sentiment in the Republican party and Gingrich is the perfect person to perpetuate the anxiety going forward. I think the sentiment is a driving force in the minds of many Republican primary voters, outweighing other factors. 


    One has to only look at the rise of gun and bullet sale after Obama's election to see a manifestation of that anxiety with Obama's election.  On one hand there was actual fear about Obama taking away their guns, but driving that underneath was the anxiety about some possible threat for which they were going to need those guns.  As long as I have my guns and plenty of bullets, I'll be okay.  Guns as a calming agent.  At the same time, there was a need to find that threat, that thing which one needed to shoot.  That's why the stoking of the fear/anxiety in the tea party sentiment by the likes of Bachmann was so insidious.  

    Now with the economy tottering on the "brink" for so long, we have an even more heightened sense of anxiety among both the liberals and the conservatives.  It is interesting that for the liberals, the impulse is to turn to the federal government to do something to calm the anxieties, while it is the conservatives who believe that dismantling the federal government is the pathway to relieving that anxiety. 


    I think the public displays of tea party "anger" may be in remission, channeled now into candidates who are perceived as able to beat up Obama, say in a debate. Let's hope the lid stays on during the election.


    That does bring up the interesting notion of politicians acting as a surrogate, a safety valve for emotions, good and bad, to express the emotions bottled up in one.


    During the election, I remember an interview with a potential voter who said, "I'm afraid that if Obama gets elected, they (Blacks) will do the same thing to us (Whites) that we did to them."

    Herman Cain tried to taps into those White fears by pointing out that he wasn't like those other "brainwashed" Blacks. Cain was their "Brother from another mother" who wanted his Secret Service code name to be "Cornbread".


    I think he was referring to being a brother to the Koch Brothers. As of yet, no confirmation from that side of the family. 


    I would add that one sees in the Occupy movement both the sentiment of tearing down the existing power structure in order to replace it with a more democratic model to implement a progressive agenda and the sentiment that what is needed is for the current existing power structure implement a new and more progressive economic agenda.  In this sense, the anxieties propelling each of these sentiments have a tendency to clash.  Those with the latter sentiment (I would be included in this group) experiences as much anxiety about the consequences of the former sentiment as it does with the perceived consequences of remaining with the status quo.


    I think as a nation we should all be equal. since this is the same old stand of the founding father's and to the legacy they left behind known as the Constitution.Republicans and Democrats unite for the whole nation.

    • There's many gambling internet sites for aussie online players but if you choose the most effective online gambling you have to check out this on line site that typically is loaded with evaluations and also slot machines online games downloads.