MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Hadeel Al Shalchi, Reuters, September 14, 2012
[....] The closure of the airport prompted speculation that the United States was deploying special forces in preparation for an attack against the militants who were involved in the attack.
A Libyan official said the spy planes flew over the embassy compound and the city, taking photos and inspecting locations of radical militant groups who are believed to have planned and staged the attack on the U.S. consulate on Tuesday.
Militants used anti-aircraft guns to fire at the drones, forcing the authorities to shut the airport because they feared for the safety of passenger planes.
"Two American drones flew over Benghazi last night with knowledge of the Libyan authorities," Deputy Interior Minister, Wanis al-Sharif told Reuters.
"They were visible to the eye, and came under attack by anti-aircraft weapons used by armed militias."
"For this reason, Benghazi security decided to close down the Benghazi airport air space. Any decision to allow an operation of any sort on Libya soil will be made in coordination with the congress and the new government." [....]
Also see:
Libyan officials: US drones behind airport closure
By Osama Alfitory, Associated Press, September 14, 2012
Comments
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/14/2012 - 11:38pm
Articles related to "what happened in Benghazi":
What Happened in Benghazi Was a Battle,
by Spencer Ackerman, DangerRoom @ wired.com, September 12, 2012
Revealed: inside story of US envoy's assassination; Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing',
by Kim Sengupta, The Independent, September 14, 2012
In Libya, Chaos Was Followed by Organized Ambush, Official Says
("was actually two attacks — the first one spontaneous and the second highly organized and possibly aided by anti-American infiltrators of Libya’s young government, "according to a top Libyan security official, Wanis el-Sharif, in an account on Thursday to "a few reporters here" [Benghazi] "the most detailed yet of the chaotic events on Tuesday")
By Suliman Ali ZWway and Rick Gladton, New York Times, September 13/14, 2012
Al Qaeda Took Advantage of Libyan Protest, CIA Chief Says,
(on House Intelligence Committee briefing & Senate Armed Services Committee briefing)
by John Parkinson and Sunlen Miller, ABC OTUS News , September 14, 2012
Officials Probing Whether al-Qaeda Planned Libya Attack
(on House Intelligence Committe briefing,)
by Gopal Ratnam and Tarek El-Tablawy, Bloomberg News, September 13, 2012
U.S. Probing al Qaeda Link in Libya
("Several current and former officials" identifying the extremists as members of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and "U.S. officials" saying "they saw no intelligence before the attack to suggest militants—either the local group or al Qaeda—wanted to hit the consulate" and "didn't believe the militants targeted the ambassador" among other thing)
By Siobhan Gorman and Adam Entous, Wall Street Journal, September 14, 2012
Qaeda seen behind US envoy killing: Libya assembly chief
Agence France Presse in Benghazi, September 14, 2012
Islamist militia braces for reprisals as Libyan anger mounts over US deaths
("People of Benghazi fear jihadists want to decouple Libya from western support, and are frustrated by lack of government action")
by Chris Stephens in Benghazi, guardian.co.uk, September 14, 2012
Diplomats’ Bodies Return to U.S., and Libyan Guards Recount Deadly Riot
by Peter Baker, David D. Kirkpatrick and Suliman Ali Zway, New York Times, September 14, 2012
Map, 'Damage to the American Mission in Benghazi,' with Timeline,
New York Times, September 12, 2012
Graphic & Map: The American Diplomatic Compound in Benghazi,
New York Times, September 14, 2012
by artappraiser on Sun, 09/16/2012 - 10:17pm
by artappraiser on Sun, 09/16/2012 - 7:33am
by artappraiser on Sun, 09/16/2012 - 8:57pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/21/2012 - 4:03am
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/21/2012 - 4:10am
Peculiar - I thought even Libya's government said for some time this was a premeditated militia attack, that they hit Stevens at a safe house away from the consulate which had to have been coordinated with inside info, that they came in after the gathering started at the consulate. (I was glad to see the Deputy Interior Minister resigned along with several others, after he put all the blame on the Americans for not handling security or just going home)
Ah well, I'll wait for the book after November.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 09/21/2012 - 6:08am
I agree we have lots of pecularity on this story, that's why I keep posting all the conflicting accounts I see, and yeah, I also agree that it might be prudent to wait for the book version after November. I'm not entirely convinced, if what you meant by after November, is that it's all about holding back because of election damage. I suspect that they are not sure what happened and hence the floood of intel-related activities. Meantime, Hillary just gives Congress the standard State Dept blather like a daily press briefing, and that pisses the GOP off. But they are doing that because they still don't know for sure what happened and therefore can't use better quality spin? I think if they knew for sure she would have given better, more passionate spin, but has to be careful because she doesn't know enough what the real deal is yet?
The Lede's post on the Ansar Al Sharia guy doing a PR campaign was an extra special "peculiar." If they had just done one denial statement or one interview it would be one thing, the standard for this kind of group, whether involved with attack or not, but this guy is going all out to persuade. He really really doesn't want to be associated with this attack, and is fighting an info war against someone trying to pin it on them. Or perhaps trying to disassociate the group from some renegade associates?
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/21/2012 - 2:47pm
"November" just means it's in no one's interest to dig into details, whether on Libyan situation or turn in Afghanistan war. I don't blame them - the Republicans certainly wouldn't be interested in truth, just their own weird detached spin. I do think Hillary has better intel than that, but I certainly don't mind her pissing off the GOP.
Re: Al Sharia, I think he has an idea the US is going to come down like a ton of bricks, and he doesn't want to hold the bag. It's a big desert, not much place to hide. I think an Iraqi or Afghani-style insurrection will be much harder to pull off in Libya once the Yanks are involved.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 09/21/2012 - 5:11pm
by artappraiser on Mon, 09/24/2012 - 12:36am
by artappraiser on Wed, 09/26/2012 - 6:22pm
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/28/2012 - 5:19am
by artappraiser on Fri, 09/28/2012 - 10:26pm
Taken with the above, this piece from a couple of days ago
with a bit of a roundup of who said what when, has pretty much convinced me that the Obama administration approaches Libya not trusting any side there. There were a lot of different simplistic political advantages to screaming "al Qaeda" right away, but they didn't until they had a bit more time to sort more things out.
by artappraiser on Sat, 09/29/2012 - 3:10am
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/02/2012 - 5:54pm
by artappraiser on Tue, 10/16/2012 - 2:22pm