MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Nate Silver, Five Thirty Eight @ nytimes.com, Dec. 18, 2012
An American child grows up in a married household in the suburbs [....] about 40 percent of such households reported having a gun in their home, according to the exit poll conducted during the 2008 presidential election [....]
[....] In 1973, about 55 percent of Republicans reported having a gun in their household against 45 percent of Democrats, according to the General Social Survey, a biennial poll of American adults.
Gun ownership has declined over the past 40 years — but almost all the decrease has come from Democrats. By 2010, according to the General Social Survey, the gun ownership rate among adults that identified as Democratic had fallen to 22 percent. But it remained at about 50 percent among Republican adults [....]
[....] the differences are most apparent in suburban areas. There, 58 percent of Republican voters said there was a gun in their household, against just 27 percent of Democrats.
Having school-aged children in the household did not significantly affect gun ownership rates, either positively or negatively. The majority of children to Republican-voting parents had a gun somewhere in their homes, while only about one in four children in Democratic-voting households did. What Democratic parents might view as a safety hazard, Republicans may see as providing their families with an extra measure of protection.
In other respects, the profile of gun owners defies some of the stereotypes that urban liberals might assign to them. For example, despite President Obama’s comments in 2008 about voters who “cling to guns and religion,” the two qualities are not strongly related to each other [....]
Comments
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/18/2012 - 9:58am
Are they really divided in anywhere near this precise way? I am curious as to how regulars here would answer that survey in case any would like to say. I would answer, if those two answers were my only choice, that the recent shooting was an isolated act of a troubled individual. But that would hardly reflect my total judgment. I also believe that "broader problems in society" likely contributed to the troubled individual's troubles and to his maniacal way of reacting to them. It is not a case of one or the other. That is why, as a rule, I normally refuse to respond to poles, they usually require simplistic answers to poorly framed questions, therefore being of no value except in simplistic cases such who the responder will vote for after all is said and done. "Who" can be answered precisely. "Why" is a lot more complicated. How to change someone's response may have many answers but often none.
by LULU (not verified) on Tue, 12/18/2012 - 11:21am
poles, they usually require simplistic answers to poorly framed questions, therefore being of no value except in simplistic cases such who the responder will vote for after all is said and done
Good to note and I certainly agree. Pew definitely is in the business of trying to figure out the culture with polls, very tricky, and their reports should be take with liberal helpings of salt
BTW, I just ran across a interesting and more sophisticated answer to the main question by a UK expert on the topic:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/12/17/guns-mass-killings-w...
Of course, this aids the Obama admin's talking points of "it's complicated," and that's not what many people want to hear right now.
by artappraiser on Tue, 12/18/2012 - 12:09pm