Then there is this:How can this be?

How come that the British media are not covering this attack on their freedom while the German media have all out coverage of it? Why is this censored and by whom? Why is the Guardian editor blogging this issue on the Guardians "Comment is free" section and not reporting it as general news? Why and how is this censored in the UK and by whom?

http://www.moonofalabama.org/

This piece by Cesca can hardly be considered an unbiased piece of reporting. Rather, it is piss-poor punditry. I said, I believe it was in my last comment here at Dag, that I like reporting with an attitude and a mixture of punditry so as to prove a point but I added the caveat that the reporting should follow journalistic standards. This piece fails completely to meet any fair standards of honest journalistic reporting. It is full of unproven allegations for which no evidence is given. Cesca says in this piece that Miranda was carrying stolen top secret materials. At his own sight Cesca says that Greenwald has admitted this but offers no link.

http://bobcesca.thedailybanter.com/

 Later, in the article you linked Cesca quotes the NYT:

 

And then, late in the evening east coast time, The New York Times revealed the purpose of Miranda’s trip to Berlin:

    Mr. Miranda was in Berlin to deliver documents related to Mr. Greenwald’s investigation into government surveillance to Ms. Poitras, Mr. Greenwald said. Ms. Poitras, in turn, gave Mr. Miranda different documents to pass to Mr. Greenwald. Those documents, which were stored on encrypted thumb drives, were confiscated by airport security, Mr. Greenwald said. All of the documents came from the trove of materials provided to the two journalists by Mr. Snowden.

 The sentence I put in bold type is not something which Greenwald said, it is something the NYT said but I have not seen substantiated antwhere. There is no reason to believe that Miranda was carrying documents that were already in possion of both Poitras and Greenwald.  The simple fact is that Miranda was carrying drafts of future Guardian columns to be co-edited by Greenwald and Poitras.
 How do I know that to be true? I don't. It is a complete bullshit statement. It is simply an explanation I hope is true and is more likely true and what I want you to believe and so I assert it as a fact. Just like the NYT. Just like Cesca. And if that assertion, which must be considered more likely to be bullshit than truth until at least some evidence is presented, is in fact true, whose secrets was Miranda carrying? Does a Brazilian carrying U.S. secrets between U.S. journalists break any United Kingdom laws? And if what Cesca asserts is/was known to be true and that shows that he was in violation of some law, why was Miranda released?

 As the hours rolled by, Charlie Savage, reporting for The New York Times, began to reveal more details about the trip — details which The Guardian mysteriously didn’t include in either of its articles.

These details don’t entirely excuse U.K. officials from holding Miranda for the full, legal-limit of nine hours, but they certainly dispel the notion that Miranda was an innocent, unaffiliated spouse on vacation, harassed by the U.K. goon squad simply because Greenwald is his partner.

Those details dispel nothing Cesca wants us to believe .

 Greenwald and Poitras have been in personal face to face contact numerous times since obtaining the documents from Snowden and both already have possession of them all, it is reasonable to believe. Why on earth would they be sending any parts of those documents back and forth across the Atlantic with a courier to another party which already had them and who could be expected to be under close surveillance and who could be detained, legally or otherwise, and whose property could be confiscated?

Mr. Miranda was in Berlin to deliver documents related to Mr. Greenwald’s investigation into government surveillance to Ms. Poitras, Mr. Greenwald said. Ms. Poitras, in turn, gave Mr. Miranda different documents to pass to Mr. Greenwald. Those documents, which were stored on encrypted thumb drives, were confiscated by airport security, Mr. Greenwald said. All of the documents came from the trove of materials provided to the two journalists by Mr. Snowden. The British authorities seized all of his electronic media — including video games, DVDs and data storage devices — and did not return them, Mr. Greenwald said.

Later:

That’s a huge piece of the puzzle, not to mention a total debunking of any hysterical assertion that Miranda was being harassed and intimidated just because he’s Greenwald’s spouse. He was, in fact, detained because he was transporting stolen national secrets.

More bullshit in bold. Cesca is asserting that a great many respected people and organizations are hysterical to believe that Miranda was targeted because of his relationship with Greenwald and he again asserts as fact that Miranda was transporting "stolen national secrets".  He doesn't know that to be true or he would no doubt offer his evidence.

 I do not know Cesca's work to have an opinion based on many readings but this article shows him to be a propagandist with little regard for common sense among his readers.