The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age

    The Desi Doctrine, or "Hints from Heloise"

    [Consider this more as brainstorming/brain farts than anything well thought out - which places me in line with the President's cabinet]

    I think we should make Wikileaks an official branch of the government with no cabinet representation - only a budget and a goal - "ferret out everything embarrassing and publish it in reasonable discreet chunks" - i.e. what they've been doing.

    Task #1 - get us the meeting notes and emails on Libya

    Doctrine 2, I think we need a market value on leaders past shelf-life: head of Libya, $1 billion (all that oil, all those memories); head of Ivory Coast? $50 million

    We need some kind of "get out of jail free/new world purgatory" to deal with that pesky bit making amends for humanitarian atrocity on their way out - much harder to to get leaders to waltz off to prison even when bankrolled in millions.Maybe a few weeks in Antarctica doing KP and lugging observation equipment, or a special meeting with the Pope to receive absolvencies or something.

    The point is, we're going to spend the money anyway. This way we save a bit, a lot less mess to clean up, can get back to our soap operas and football games and Daily Show.

    Doctrine 3, Protesters and rebels and others in the opposition will need to submit dossiers - background info, ambitions, an essay on a) what they did on summer vacation or b) what they would do if presented the reins of a major world power with large caches of weapons and oil reserves or c) who special I know that should get me out of writing this garbage.

    Special bonus marks for charity work, being vegetarian, hosting FIFA or the Olympics, high SATs or having a plan for peaceful transition. Having run a death squad or released Ebola for fun and profit is normally a disqualifier, but we're interested in hearing inspirational stories of drawing back from the abyss, so if you feel there's a heart warming story lurking in there, please feel free to take more pages.

    Between the UN and EU and NATO, our holy triumverate, we need fast track status for processing applicants of need, while the rest will go through normal procedures and wait times. 

    As part of fast track, we need to decide which types of special circumstance warrant express service: humanitarian crisis, friends with important people, truckloads of money to dispose of, vacation's coming up and gotta make plans.

    While that seems a bit tongue in cheek, I think Canada for one allows rich people to skip to the head of the immigration line, and quite frankly they're going to do it anyhow, somehow, some way. This is just to acknowledge "can-do spirit" and note the bit of economic free-market attitude in every true democratic movement. (Versus socialists, for whom we'll assume that "equality for all" and "shared resources" means they haven't thought about it much - not a rejection, just a "do over - go back and figure out what the guards and the UN leaders' kids are going to live on if you try it this way".) Doha and Davos peace conventions don't come cheap - time people understand the mechanisms of funding, how the world works. (murmur murmer, bloody hippies)

    The primary purpose of this exercise is to skip the wearisome rebel/bomb/overthrow/re-corrupt/stagnate rinse cycle we seem to be stuck with. (Like our friends who always choose the worst possible dates/partners available, and then complain "there are just no good single prospects out there" while we mentally adopt the "Luser" sign).

    I admire America's ambitions - taking over the world's oil reserves and blowing the lot on vacations in the Seychelles or yachts in the Bahamas or just badly fitting suits and tacky homes in uninteresting places is certainly forward thinking. But somewhere in the middle of this wishful thinking, they forget that invasions have costs, and by the time we've gathered all the materials and work crews and support staff to make it happen, well, we're already in the red.

    America doesn't know how to budget. Internally, externally, not for anything. Of course if you have a huge ATM that you can just go to when you have your next coke frenzy hit and need a truckload of blow, that all works fine, but most trust funds/credit lines are limited. Or at least it's nice to tell the trust managers to sell another factory or resort, tell the mint workers to print up another trillion so the Republicans/tea baggers can hyper-ventilate for the cameras while their arms contractors line up outside their doors.

    So anyway, here's a box to fill in your own Hints for Heloise - how to run the next revolution. Special points for using something next generation internetish (2.0, smart grids, nanotech, convergedhypersocialaugmentedinductiveontologicalmindsharing....)

    Remember who your audience is: easy-to-follow instructions are light years ahead of hard-to-understand recipes with ingredients not commonly stocked that have to be ordered or specially prepared.

    While fruit cocktail is fine as an easy after-dinner treat, we'll be feeding a world of 7 billion - main course is required. Not everyone will be inspired by seaweed casserolle without a good deal of preparation, and there's only so many times you can offer hamburger helper before you inspire another revolt. (speaking of which, regional dietary considerations have to be accounted for, and leaving the house smelling of fried fish for weeks after is also unacceptable, no matter what your GOP/libertarian buddy says).

    Oh, and bonus points if you can find a creative way of addressing the difference between oil-holding and non-oil-holding states besides bland puffy overused phrases like "strategic interests". "Them's the breaks", "know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em", and other blithe ways of dismissing the interests of several billion people in one swell foop are all appreciated. A sense of irony and self-deprecation goes far.

    Go get 'em, dagblog tigers!

    Your brain fart here ----->

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Comments

    Hmmm, okay, let me try priming the pump.

    "When I grow up, I want to help people. If we're going to overthrow countries, we should plant trees to help with global warming, plus oxygen helps people think clearer."

    "I think countries should have good systems like ours, so if there's another war, we can send in some of our politicians to teach them how to get along and work together."

    "Since the internet is so effective, instead of dropping bombs, we should be dropping internets. My father pays $20 per month for DSL. So if Libya has 6 million people, they could all have DSL for $720 million a year. That sounds like a lot of money, but if we take all their oil I think we could probably pay for it and then they would have Facebook, which brings people together."

    "I think we should invade countries that are closer to home so we don't have to travel as far."


    Egad; thanks.  I didn't want to be the one for the umpteenth time to ask for an explanation.  Now I'll maybe be able to come up with something past: We should teach them Rollerball, and the sides can compete to the death, as goes the game.

    Teams will be chosen by AIPAC members and B'Hai's...or something.

     

    Oh--and you mentioned Food and Feeding so often, I thought there had to be a Recipe component, literally.  Gatorade.


    Shy but interesting first stab.

    James Caan, special ambassador to the Mideast. 

    Sadly John Houseman is not available to explain the rules to the thronging masses: "You have to understand, Jonathan, no single player is bigger than the game."

    Not Qaddafi, not Julian Assange, not even Barack Obama.

    Oil must go on. Nothing can stop it. Not even Japanese skaters high on Gatorade.

    You wanted no rules? You got no rules. Play ball.


    Er, on the internets suggestion, will someone please tell him/her that we've been there, done that but there's been a glitch or two?

    Syria's Assad warns of 'conspiracy'

    Syrian president fails to lift emergency laws in his first speech since security forces curbed anti-government protests.
    Last Modified: 30 Mar 2011 19:41

    ....During his speech, that lasted almost one hour, Assad took aim at social networking websites and pan-Arabic satellite television news channels but made no mention of any plans to lift the state of emergency.

    [.....]

    He said "conspirators" have tried to reinforce sectarianism to incite hatred and "bring down Syria".....

    http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/03/2011330135615434966...

    Actually, someone should inform that person that free access to Facebook could be argued to be one of the main reasons we ended up bombing Gaddafi's weapons? Laughing


    But if we dropped Facebooks on them, they'd have to read them, no?

    If we control airspace, we can turn raisin bombers into hotspot bombers, all those antennae springing from the desert like cockroaches after a nuclear war.

    If the CIA could robotize them, we'd have internet on the move.

     


    Agreed, citizens need to be able to exit their country, government and leaders more easily - esp. as emigration, election and armed rebellion are apparently so difficult. I'd propose we open the following doors to national re-creation:

    1. Bankruptcy. Citizens should be able to declare their nation bankrupt, hand it over to a trustee, who would then sell the nation to the banks at auction. The banks would then be permitted to kill and eat the existing governing officials and - perhaps less popular - own the sorry asses of the remaining populace. Not much of an improvement perhaps, but at least we're all quite accustomed to the procedure. No way a political leader - no matter how psycho - beats the banks.

    2. Return-To-Sender. Here, a majority of citizens can simply show up at the Post Office some morning, and have "Return To Sender" stamped on their foreheads, with the result that the country has to be officially handed back to whoever used to own it. Because every country used to be owned by somebody else. So, Canada would be placed back in the hands of the Cree, while the US would be handed back to, ummmm, Jesus, I think. Again, no way a psycho political leader beats Jesus. Or the Cree.

    3. The Q-cott. This technique moves beyond the boycott, by having absolutely everyone everywhere refuse to ever recognize the nation in question. It's like shunning, only with less gingham. In it, the nation's name is not to be pronounced, its flag never flown, no anthem sung, blank patches on maps, no invitations to sports events or UN activities, etc. Eventually, any psycho leader worth his salt would have to flee, because really, they're only in it for the attention. After they leave, the nation can be returned to normalcy, with the proviso that it's name forever after be preceded by a... Q. As in, the Q-nited Kingdom, the Q-nited States, Q-anada, Q-atar, etc.


    You got me thinking - after all this paternalistic/fraternalistic boycotting, maybe we'd get better results with girlcotts.

    Another model might be to play by Casino rules - house always wins, any disturbance gets hustled outside and not invited back, free drinks as long as you've got chips in. I've never seen a Casino have the tawdry disorder these countries seem to have. Why send in cruise missiles when house security could have had Qaddafi blacklisted in 5 minutes - just doesn't make sense.


    All actions and their administration/outcomes will henceforth be determined by playing a game. You know, like that farm game some of my distant cousins play on Facebook.  Mebbe we call this one, "Oil World", or "Random-Accident-of-Birth World".  Players are assigned assets based on the country they were born in, (Capitalistic powerhouse nation, Oil exporting, great place to  raise goats, etc.).  What we actually do in the real world will be determined by taking all individual games in aggregate, in real time and averaging the outcomes.  As a side benefit, the predictive outcomes of the aggregate can be written into algorithms, then financialized and bundled into a kinda super lotto, with varying outcomes valued by an independent rating agency.  That last keeps the economy moving along, while providing funding for real world actions.  Any real world leader who doesn't accept his/her outcome, has all assets seized, and same distributed to his/her citizens/subjects.  A player who can amass a big enough "Fan Club" and can assume the reigns of power in nominal dictatorships, and circumvent the requirement to submit to the aggregate demand of his country's players.  Sumthing like that?


    So...if the game is already being played, it must be self sufficient and probably tips well.


    Noticed your old pal Billy Glad piping up on topic @ Juan Cole:

    http://www.juancole.com/2011/04/defections-us-withdrawal-point-to-politi...


    " In other words, NATO would attempt to create conditions under which the rebels could lay down their arms and organize politically, effectively ending the violence from both sides. That would be something to see."

    Yes, that is a nice phrasing. It's a bit problematic to implement, but we're supposed to be problem solvers, not just monkeys using toys of destruction in a lather-rinse-repeat fashion.


    Remember that conservative guy who was lecturing us about being condescending, and the need for direct talk?

    Well, I called him a poo. So he took down all his blogs, and left. Said he was a grown man, and wouldn't be spoken to with such disrespect. 

    Really.

    From now on, I'm using the poor insult waaaaaaay more often.

    "Hey Des. You're poo."


    If you do that, we may need to escalate to the saying of

    NI!!

     


    P.S. Orion = Clearthinker, right? The whole 'all my blogs are packed and I'm ready to go' routine just is earily similar. Has Orion talked about his Maxim girlfriends yet..?


    Que?


    Que quoi...? "Ni" famously sends even hardy knights running off in fear. Much more effective than "Poo", which only works on conservatives.


    I was going for espanol; sorry.  Forgot you're fluent in umpteen languages, Pug.  But thanks, didn't know the 'Ni!'

    I am in a panic, maybe you can help me out.  Just discovered Salt Lake PBS quit MI-5 for some time.  Last episode 'Jo', the (now) crew-cut blonde agent recruited on the street by Adam had been abducted by Scary Dudes who were about to torture her in hideous ways.  She begged Adam to break her neck so she wouldn't have to suffer and spill every name of every spook in MI-5.  Last scene, help was on the way, she and Adam were in the corner, she seemed asleep or dead, a tear was rolling down his face. 

    [End.]

    Did he euthanize her?  Please say you remember!!!


    Turns out she just faked her death and they get saved by the special forces. But she is so traumatized by the experience she doesn't go back to work/she gets chucked off the show.

    And ... why exactly am I regarded as the authority on any and all obscure tv shows? Is this my rep, now? Ask Q about renewable energy, Desi or AA about the middle east, Trope about philosophy and, oh, Obey about the Bold and the Beautiful. crapola...

    ;0)


    Sounds like the soul-dislocating effects of an Interrupted Hara-kiri a warrior has prepared for; as though one is dead already, and Life has already been forfeit.  God.

    You had mentioned once seeing the series.  Otherwise: Some people inspire Tropes, others inspire Greatness.  Moi; I inspire Sneezing and Sputting.  So it goes...

    We all have our parts to play.  (What are you doing still awake????)


    Snicker. ;-)