MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Jimmy Carter Lusts for a Trump Posting
Interview by Maureen Dowd @ NYTimes.com, Oct. 21, done in Plains GA.
And Rosalyn and him disagree about whether Rusisans influenced the election.
Excerpt:
[....] When I asked about Trump’s souring our image in the world, Carter defended his successor.
“Well, he might be escalating it but I think that precedes Trump,” he said. “The United States has been the dominant character in the whole world and now we’re not anymore. And we’re not going to be. Russia’s coming back and India and China are coming forward.”
Holy malaise.
He also said he liked Trump’s initiative reaching out to Saudi Arabia. He doesn’t know Jared Kushner but is not totally dismissive of the idea that the son-in-law could succeed where others have failed.
“I’ve seen in the Arab world, including the Palestinian world,” he said, “the high esteem that they pay to a member of one’s own family.”
Indeed, Carter was harder on Obama during the interview than he was on Trump [.....]
By Kevin D. Williamson @ NationalReview.com, Oct. 20
Can't summarize it with a quote. As Yglesias says:
By Masha Gessen @ News Desk @ NewYorker.com, Oct. 20
Lede: The chief of staff sees his role as controlling Trump. If the President obeys him, then the President cannot be criticized.
Consider this nightmare scenario: a military coup. You don’t have to strain your imagination—all you have to do is watch Thursday’s White House press briefing, in which the chief of staff, John Kelly, defended President Trump’s phone call to a military widow, Myeshia Johnson. The press briefing could serve as a preview of what a military coup in this country would look like, for it was in the logic of such a coup that Kelly advanced his four arguments [....]
The President has not sanctioned an Iranian firm with ties to the Revolutionary Guard and a Trump Organization business partner.
By Adam Davidson @ NewsDesk @ NewYorker.com, Oct. 20
[....] After Trump’s speech, the Treasury named Shahid Alamolhoda Industries, Rastafann Ertebat Engineering Company, and Fanamoj as, essentially, tools of the Revolutionary Guard. Strikingly, the Treasury did not name Azarpassillo, an Iranian firm with a leadership made up of lifelong Revolutionary Guard officers. Azarpassillo’s leaders have been named by U.S. officials as likely money launderers for the Revolutionary Guard and, through their international construction operations, the company is ideally suited to provide W.M.D. components.
Azarpassillo has another interesting connection; one of its apparent partners in money laundering, the Mammadov family of Azerbaijan, was also, until quite recently, in business with the Trump Organization. In fact, for the entire Presidential campaign, the Trump Organization knew that it was actively involved with a company that was likely laundering money for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. This is not a wild conspiracy theory; it is an acknowledged fact, confirmed by Alan Garten, the Trump Organization’s general counsel, and not disputed by the White House or any of the people involved. Ivanka Trump directly oversaw the relationship with the Mammadov family, led by Ziya Mammadov, a man whom American diplomats have called “notoriously corrupt even for Azerbaijan. ”[....]
Both political parties may be doomed
By David von Drehle @ WashingtonPost.com, Oct. 20
[....] The truth is, both parties are in crisis — and may be headed for worse [....]
[....] For generations, the major parties have served as rival department stores anchoring opposite ends of America’s political shopping mall. They chose which products to offer and favored certain ones with their most prominent displays. They marshaled big budgets for advertising and thus loomed over the boutiques and specialty stores — the greens, the libertarians and so on — serving smaller clienteles.
Smartphones and the Internet are killing big retail by connecting buyers directly to products. The same is in store for the major parties. Donald Trump went directly to the voters through Facebook and Twitter; they, in turn, swept him past Republican gatekeepers to commandeer the mannequins and display cases of the GOP. Likewise, Sanders has found plenty of volunteers and cash to support his attempted hostile takeover of the Democratic Party.
Voters no longer need — nor, in many cases, want — a political party to screen their candidates and vet their ideas. They prefer to build their own movements, often with stunning speed. The change is not limited to the United States. Britain’s major parties didn’t want Brexit, but it’s happening. Major parties in France didn’t want Emmanuel Macron; now he’s president [....]
By Danny Vinik @ Politico.com, Oct. 20
Beneath the high-profile disputes, Trump made some big and surprising policy moves.
This one really surprises me:
2. IRS ramps up enforcement of Obamacare
[....] the administration has left the mandate alone—and this week the Internal Revenue Service took a step to strengthen it. The agency said that it will not accept 2017 tax returns that don‘t disclose the taxpayer’s health-insurance status or specify whether the taxpayer qualifies for an exemption. That disclosure is required under the ACA, but in the first two years since the mandate took effect, the IRS still processed tax returns that left the question blank, giving some Americans a backdoor way to evade the rule. Now, in something of a surprise, the IRS is closing that loophole.
By Melissa Quinn @ WashingtonExaminer.com, Oct. 19
Posted because it's an innovative approach to questions. Looks from this that is 22% of Republicans that are the hardcore fans, but a disturbingly high number of Republicans, 79%, are overall still okay with him as president. Still, 42% of the population is a pretty damn high number for rating a president "worst in history" even though it's not been a full year:
[....] The poll from the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion released Thursday found 16 percent of adults say Trump's legacy will be below average, while 42 percent believe the president will be remembered as one of the worst in history.
Seven percent of adults say Trump will be considered one of the best presidents, compared to another 11 and 19 percent who say he will be remembered as an above average or average commander in chief, respectively.
Expectations for Trump's presidency are divided among party lines, with 88 percent of Democrats believing the president will be remembered as either below average or one of the worst American presidents.
By contrast, 79 percent of Republicans think Trump will leave behind a more positive legacy. Thirty-one percent of GOP voters think people will remember Trump as average, while 26 percent say he'll be above average. Twenty-two percent said Trump will be rated as one of the greatest presidents in U.S. history [....]
By Brandon Carter @ TheHill.com, Oct. 20
Old tweets posted by President Trump in which he attacked generals resurfaced Friday after the White House said it was “inappropriate” to criticize them.In Friday’s White House press briefing, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said it would be “highly inappropriate” to criticize chief of staff John Kelly for his remarks towards a Florida congresswoman about a phone call Trump placed to a Gold Star family.
"If you want to go after Gen. Kelly, that's up to you. But I think that if you want to get into a debate with a 4-star Marine general, that's something that's highly inappropriate," Sanders said.
Twitter users, including Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), quickly resurfaced Trump’s old tweets following the briefing [....]
Where "It Girl " Kellyanne when you need her very special creative spinning abilities?
video with recording @ link to judge for yourself
By Max Greenwood @ TheHill.com, Oct. 20
The widow of an Army staff sergeant who was killed in Afghanistan earlier this year shared her call with President Trump days after her husband's death with The Washington Post.
Natasha De Alencar, the widow of Army Staff Sgt. Mark De Alencar, who was killed in a firefight in Afghanistan in April, described her conversation with Trump as a "moment of niceness" during an otherwise turbulent and heart-wrenching time.
“At that moment when my world was upside down and me and my kids didn’t know which way we were going, it felt like I was talking to just another regular human,” she told the Post [....]
.....there is presently no head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, no head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and no secretaries of the Health and Human Services or Homeland Security departments.
It’s hard to coordinate an interagency response to a public health crisis when you have a bunch of substitute teachers in the classroom.
A flurry of House GOP retirements could make the speaker's job even harder.
By Rachel Bade @ Politico.com, 10/19/2017 06:20 PM EDT
Paul Ryan’s governing caucus is dwindling.
A number of the speaker's closest comrades in the House have called it quits in recent weeks because they're tired of President Donald Trump's antics, depressed over the GOP's dearth of legislative accomplishments this year or have personal reasons. Whatever the causes, the departures are certain to make Ryan's job as House speaker harder, depriving him of loyal lieutenants in a conference already riven by ideological and stylistic divisions [....]
Mike Pompeo misrepresented a January report released by U.S. intelligence agencies that reached no conclusions about whether Moscow’s efforts altered the outcome of the 2016 election.
By Greg Miller @ WashingtonPost.com, Oct. 19
CIA Director Mike Pompeo declared Thursday that U.S. intelligence agencies determined that Russia’s interference in the 2016 American presidential election did not alter the outcome, a statement that distorted spy agency findings.
“The intelligence community’s assessment is that the Russian meddling that took place did not affect the outcome of the election,” Pompeo said at a security conference in Washington.
His comment suggested — falsely — that a report released by U.S. intelligence agencies in January had ruled out any impact that could be attributed to a covert Russian interference campaign [....]
By Maya Salam @ NYTimes.com, Oct. 19
For the first time in its 64-year history, Playboy magazine will feature a transgender Playmate, a decision that Cooper Hefner, a top executive at the magazine, said on Thursday was in keeping with its founding mission of embracing changing attitudes about sex.
The French model Ines Rau, 26, will appear as the November centerfold in the first issue since the death of Mr. Hefner’s father, the magazine’s founder, Hugh Hefner. Selecting Ms. Rau “very much speaks to the brand’s philosophy,” said Mr. Hefner, 26, Playboy’s chief creative officer. “It’s the right thing to do. We’re at a moment where gender roles are evolving.” [...]
Caption: Ines Rau, a French model, is the November Playmate of the Month in Playboy’s November/December collector’s edition. Credit Derek Kettela
By Peter Baker @ NYTimes.com, Oct. 19, 8:16 pm
home page lede: Former President George W. Bush defended immigration and free trade, while condemning nationalism, protectionism and “casual cruelty” in public discourse.
Neither of them mentioned President Trump by name but two of his predecessors emerged from political seclusion on Thursday to deliver what sounded like pointed rebukes of the current occupant of the Oval Office and the forces of division that propelled him to power.
In separate and unrelated appearances, former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama both warned that the United States was being torn apart by ancient hatreds that should have been consigned to history long ago and called for addressing economic anxiety through common purpose. While not directly addressing Mr. Trump, neither left much doubt whom and what they had in mind.
Mr. Bush, the last Republican to hold the White House, spoke out at a conference he convened in New York to support democracy [....]
The Republican senator let loose on the president in an interview with POLITICO, even though it will likely hurt him in his 2018 primary.
By Burgess Everett & Seung Min Kim @ Politico.com, Oct. 19
[....] If anything, Flake is determined to make his campaign against Trump-aligned candidate Kelli Ward a referendum on the future of the Republican Party.
“You can always eke out an election victory here and there,” he told POLITICO in an interview this week. “But … resentment is not a governing philosophy.” [....]
By Kenneth P. Vogel & Cecilia Kang @ NYTimes.com, Oct. 19, 8:22 am (currently the headline story)
New survey data casts doubt on a popular framework used by universities to identify microaggressions.
By Conor Friedersdorf @ The Atlantic.com, Oct. 16
As the ranks of college administrators have swelled in higher education, one task they’ve undertaken is more aggressively training students—and at times, faculty members— in what is variously called “cultural competence” or “diversity and inclusion.”
The aims of these efforts are laudable [....] But when training faculty members or educating students so that they are “culturally competent,” a process that should involve telling them pertinent facts, is instead used as a pretext to indoctrinate them into a contested ideology, the laudable becomes objectionable [....]
The Cato/YouGov survey on free speech and tolerance that I reported on last week included questions about whether folks find the same sentiments expressed above offensive.
Among the results?
Telling a recent immigrant, “you speak good English” was deemed “not offensive” by 77 percent of Latinos; saying “I don’t notice people’s race” was deemed “not offensive” by 71 percent of African Americans and 80 percent of Latinos; saying “America is a melting pot” was deemed not offensive by 77 percent of African Americans and 70 percent of Latinos; saying “America is the land of opportunity” was deemed “not offensive” by 93 percent of African Americans and 89 percent of Latinos; and saying “everyone can succeed in this society if they work hard enough” was deemed “not offensive” by 89 percent of Latinos and 77 percent of African Americans [....]
Q&A for Richard Spencer 10/19 Event
They didn't invite him, he just rented the venue and then threatened a First Amendment lawsuit when they denied him.
Excerpt
Why doesn’t UF make Spencer pay the full estimated $500,000 cost for security?
The application and assessment of security fees in the First Amendment context was litigated and decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1992. The Court clarified that the government cannot assess a security fee on the speaker based upon the costs of controlling the reaction of potential hostile onlookers or protestors, under a legal doctrine called the “heckler’s veto.” As Justice Harry Blackmun wrote for the Court in that case (Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement), “[s]peech cannot be financially burdened, any more than it can be punished or banned, simply because it might offend a hostile mob.” For UF, this means that Richard Spencer and his organization may not be made responsible for paying the costs of potential protestors, onlookers or members of the public outside of the speaking venue.
Oh and the Governor declared a State of Emergency in order to get National Guard, etc., as per Christine Emba op-ed @ WaPo.
Ok, they say only $80K, but the number will grow as they dig in more, like with everything else.
Everything they complained about Hillary doing was something they were and still are, but to a much higher degree than fathomed.