MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The scientific literature on this subject is robust, and the consensus overwhelming. The lower your parents’ income, the lower your likely level of educational attainment. Period. But instead of focusing on ways to increase household income, educationists in both political parties talk about extending ladders of opportunity to poor children, most recently in the form of charter schools. For many children, though—especially those raised in the racially segregated poverty endemic to much of the United States—the opportunity to attend a good public school isn’t nearly enough to overcome the effects of limited family income.
Comments
wow, this is not just another analyst blathering on topic, this a major recantation by an important true believer. And among other things, he's lecturing his fellow philanthropists about it
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 3:23am
Fascinating. It sometimes feels as if we're moving toward a tipping point.
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 4:44pm
I doubt it. While I agree with Arta's post about this particular author this isn't new news. I've been following education news since the 80's when I considered a career in education. The one point I came across often and consistently in study after study is that the most reliable indicator of a child's education attainment was the parent's income. This was true across all income groups. Upper middle class children did better than lower middle class. Lower upper class children did better than upper middle class children.
We've know this for decades. The focus has always been on how education can lift some out of poverty and how we can use it to lift even more. All the while ignoring the elephant in the room. How poverty holds most poor children back despite the quality of their schools.
The main take away from this article for me was, " The scientific literature on this subject is robust, and the consensus overwhelming. The lower your parents’ income, the lower your likely level of educational attainment. Period." Unfortunately there was no link. I tried to find a link to more detailed information to support this point but, as usual, my search skills suck.
by ocean-kat on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 5:38pm
The ideas have been around for a while, but I sense that they're becoming more mainstream. Maybe not so much on education specifically, but the problem of income inequality has received far more attention than it did even a few years ago. Rich people are starting to worry about it. Once-marginal "redistributionists" like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are now serious presidential candidates. Even Fox News demagogues are starting to incorporate income inequality into their spiel (in between xenophobic rants).
by Michael Wolraich on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 6:38pm
how about this one? Came up on google right after his op ed when I plugged in his sentence The lower your parents’ income, the lower your likely level of educational attainment. Period
Does money affect children’s outcomes? Kerris Cooper and Kitty Stewart 22nd Oct 2013 @ jfr.org.uk
excerpt, my underlining
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 8:27pm
Let's see you splain these outliers, tho :
by artappraiser on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 8:58pm
Hey, more STEM & Charter schools - that'll fix it. Oh, and armed security guards.
by PeraclesPlease on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 7:26am
Follows the suggestion Dutch historian Rutger Bregman gave at Davos
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/1/30/18203911/davos-rutger-bregman-historian-taxes-philanthropy
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 06/11/2019 - 12:38pm
Barack Obama recommended the article on Twitter as a thought-provoker:
I found about that here, in this new WaPo analysis piece by Valerie Strauss:
A billionaire changes his mind about school reform and what kids really need — and Barack Obama has a surprising reaction
which is worth a gander if you are interested in topic as she also gets into Obama's past on topic and Hanauer's past ideas and influence. And she also notes some of the flak Obama's tweet got.
by artappraiser on Thu, 06/20/2019 - 2:10am
But what about this part as regards improving the economic class situation? I.E. the whole Head Start meme?
The lighting of a fire: The benefits of pre-schooling may extend for generations
An educational experiment on small children in the 1960s seems to be benefiting their families half a century later
@ The Economist, June 11
by artappraiser on Thu, 06/20/2019 - 2:55pm