MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
By Neil MacFarquahar and Michael Slackman, New York Times, March 19, 2011
MANSOURA, Egypt — Elated that for the first time in their lives every ballot mattered, Egyptians flocked to the polls in record numbers on Saturday to vote in a referendum on a package of constitutional amendments that will shape the country’s political future after Hosni Mubarak’s overthrow. From this provincial capital in the Nile Delta, across the sprawling capital of Cairo and beyond, voters were already waiting when the polls opened at 8 a.m., and the lines grew throughout the day, sometimes stretching until the wait exceeded three hours....
Also see:
Some thoughts on Egypt's referendum
By Issandr El Amrani, Arabist.net, March 19, 2011
....Were I Egyptian, I'm not sure how I would vote. Most of my friends are voting no, and there are good reasons to do so. The constitutional committee was appointed hastily and its composition was problematic, some of the revised amendments — notably on nationality requirements — stink of chauvinism, and the army has been clumsy in advocating for a yes vote and intimidating the no campaign. Yet, at the same time, I can understand the yes vote: a desire to move quickly so that the army returns to the barracks, political stability is more quickly restored and that the mandate for transition is clear (this is basically what the referendum is really about — granting a mandate to the army's transition blueprint).....
Comments
Hard to imagine why they would tie the time frame to the rest of the issues; 'fair' would have been voting on that as a second issue. Interpreting the vote seems like it will be fraught.
by we are stardust on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 7:02pm
by artappraiser on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 10:34pm
What happened to ElBaradei was shameful, and the Muslim Brotherhood was quick to denounce it (the people roughing him up said they were Islamist; not all Islamists are Brothers). I agree with him that the constitutional changes proposed don't go far enough, but nothing stops the parliament to be elected in September from drafting a whole new constitution. I suspect the proposal will win overwhelming approval, and that ElBaradei will accept that as the freely expressed will of the people. And vice-versa, of course, if the proposal is voted down. Calling the revolution "a deeply divided mess" is pure hyperbole. A nation is giving birth to itself. Some pain is involved.
by acanuck on Sun, 03/20/2011 - 1:07am
It did pass, BTW, approved by more than three-quarters of those voting.
About 41% of those eligible to vote did cast ballots -- a vast jump over previous Egyptian elections, which everyone assumed to be rigged.
by acanuck on Sun, 03/20/2011 - 10:44pm
Voting along sectarian and class lines, and also country mouse vs. city mouse; very disappointing for the secular liberal youth movement; a yearning for stability in order to get back to business, tourism, etc.:
by artappraiser on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 3:40am
I'm actually heartened by the fact that almost a full quarter cast "no" ballots. The argument that people should reject partial changes that everyone agrees are positive, in order to hold out for more fundamental ones, is a rather nuanced one. But millions of ordinary Egyptians seem to have understood, suggesting secular democrats have a pretty solid base to build on.
A parliamentary election in June doesn't leave them much time to organize. On the bright side, they ended Mubarak's three-decade reign in just 18 days. If they unite and co-ordinate their efforts, they'll make good showings in urban areas. There will probably be a unity government that includes the Brothers. Not necessarily a bad thing.
by acanuck on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 4:00am
by artappraiser on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 3:48am