MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
After the Aug. 21 chemical weapons incident in Syria, a number of senior U.S. intelligence analysts disagreed with the Obama administration’s rush to judgment blaming the Syrian government, but their dissent on this question of war or peace was concealed from the American people.
Comments
Suddenly, Giraldi is everywhere. I just dissed him in regards to a conclusion he reached on a particular issue regarding Snowden. I will note here and stress that it was just a subjective conclusion I thought was wrong but not his statements of objective fact. His assertion in an article at The American Conservative about intelligence people threatening to resign over twisting of intelligence about Assad using poison gas is not proven one way or another at this point but is certainly worth considering. Also, considering the source, I found the comments to his article particularly interesting.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/quitting-over-syria/
Another sight I find quite credible in its analysis, The Moon of Alabama, also refers to Gibraldi in its cover of this topic.
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2013/11/syria-insurgency-infighting-cia-ana...
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 11/14/2013 - 2:23pm
If you haven't checked it out, I think you may find things of interest to you in the "Locked in the Cabinet" Politico piece, particularly on page 3 (on Sec. Gates vs. White House; Libya) and page 5 (on Syria decision & Kerry; Hagel). I'd suggest reading the whole thing, it really does help to lay out a full picture of a modus operandi that in turns helps explain a lot of past stories in the news, both on foreign and defense policy and on domestic matters.
by artappraiser on Thu, 11/14/2013 - 3:33pm
I read that this morning when I saw your link at In The News. I did find it interesting and it did explain some things. It did not explain why they would think it okay to twist intelligence [if they in fact did] to try to justify dropping bombs on people or why they would have confidence enough that they could get away with it. If they were willing to sex up the intelligence it suggests that all they feel they are risking is having some negative big thing for a week or so until the next big thing makes it go away, as suggested by someone somewhere recently about a different subject.
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 11/14/2013 - 10:17pm
Now this. Emptywheel says parts of that Politico profile are obvious bullshit but no details as to which parts yet.
http://www.emptywheel.net/author/emptywheel/
by A Guy Called LULU on Thu, 11/14/2013 - 11:10pm