MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Comments
Re, the article says
look at this:
This is just highly delusional stuff, far from a genius plotter where lying would be a ruthlessly enforced part of the plot.
To me, it looks like what Cohen says he did is help spin the desired narratives of a madman:
My point in pointing this out: I think too many, including you, PP, have too high hopes that Mueller will bring a grand genius plot down including Pence. I suspect the reason is that there is no there there, only a multitude of crazy fumblings to keep the crazy boss and father pleased. And that is why it gets so complicated and so hard to write 'splainers like this article. And why Mueller's investigation ends up going in so many directions. It's more like this: a bunch of grifters with their own agendas clinging on to and promoting a madman and in doing so finding it necessary to spin his alternate realities. A madman who especially idolizes strong men like Putin. So they go with the flow and are interested in doing deals with the same.
I just fear that impeachment type proceedings are not going to come up egregious enough plotting. He is just going to find lots of obstruction and lots of plotting by underlings in order to serve their own agendas (i.e., Flynn.) For emoluments, yes, that's much clearer.
The 25th amendment Section 4 seems to be the real remedy, but you can see the problem we have when reading it:
by artappraiser on Sat, 01/26/2019 - 7:17pm
No, not willy-nilly, which is what they'd like you to believe. Determined, planned, quid-pro-quos at each step with receipts. The reason there are so many directions is these guys are corrupt in so many directions.
Someone noted today that indictments kick in discivery. If Mueller indicts on critical Russian conspiracy charges at this point, he risks having to open up the books and letting all the evidence spill ouy. By focusing on lesser, more contained charges, there's less of value they can discover and share with Trump.
Prince is more difficult, but he signed off or observed & aquiesced to campaign illegalities since Aug 2016, and was transition head after the election, covering for Flynn's illegality etc- I imagine Mueller has the goods on him too, but don't know. Actually I think it's more key if McConnell survives to gum up the works.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 01/26/2019 - 7:56pm
Why did Manafort push Pence on Trump? Or did Manafort's masters?
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a23133924/paul-manafort-c...
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 01/26/2019 - 11:02pm
Here's a very succinct headline:
Trump advisers lied over and over again, Mueller says. The question is, why?
@ WashingtonPost.com, Jan. 27, 8 am
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 11:23am
Because...cuz... her emails!!!
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 12:41pm
This isn't a criticism of you or Arta for posting twitter feeds but I do think it's important to know that only 7% of Americans use twitter. To contrast that, 41% of Americans have a facebook page.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 3:06pm
Sure, but I hate political threads on Facebook - dunno why.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 3:13pm
I only posted this because I've been thinking a lot recently about the fracturing of the media market and the micro-targeting of ads to finance it. The good news of course is probably more than 7% watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
by ocean-kat on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 3:36pm
Yep, and good riddance to bad trash for those who haven't...
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 5:06pm
yes but that's not a distinction to the elite of the future who prefer Instagram and Snapchat.
The way I see it as a mature adult: Facebook circles are for family and friends. I actually don't use it much at all, but I certainly don't look down on those who do so for that reason. But mho, in general: people should not be letting their family and friends influence what news they see and thereby allow them to influence political opinion formation.It's like talking politics at the Thanksgiving table.
I have "curated" those I follow at Twitter to deliver me art news and general news. It's actually quite efficient if you chose well as to intelligent thoughtfulness and a mixture of political opinion, as those people retweet the best stuff from their connections.
One could do similar, I guess, at Facebook by signing up for an account your family and friends don't know about. But I find few quality writers or journalists promoting a Facebook page anymore, and in that way I believe you'd end up with a higher noise to signal ratio.
I get what you are saying, that we are not seeing what is influencing the public at large, but then I never cared for most USA Today writers and readers in the past, why would I want to do that now? That is why I am here, actually. I'm elitist that way, I am interested in smarter than average news and analysis. Now if one of my connections tweets "hey you need to see what's going on viral on Facebook", then I'll look. Like that.
by artappraiser on Sun, 01/27/2019 - 6:38pm