MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
The National Security Agency is using complex analysis of electronic surveillance, rather than human intelligence, as the primary method to locate targets for lethal drone strikes – an unreliable tactic that results in the deaths of innocent or unidentified people.
Comments
by A Guy Called LULU on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 8:34am
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 1:58pm
My highlighting. And I suggest to read the article in full for more details on new policy.
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 2:30pm
Marcy Wheeler's analysis of the above story.
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 2:39pm
I wonder how long before the policy includes, "any American, who should speak out against the drone strike, will be considered giving aid and comfort to the enemy"?
by Resistance on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 3:15pm
People got a lot more heat for speaking out against Vietnam than drones. The Dixie Chicks had their music careered damaged by speaking out against Bush. Given that Ted Nugent can wish the President dead and a woman at a GOP town hall meeting can call for Obama's execution, I don't think that herds of people who speak out are going to be jailed. A Governor shoved her finger in Obama"s face and was not thrown in jail.
by rmrd0000 on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 5:58pm
Innocents will be killed whether we rely on electronic surveillance or human intelligence, and even if we act in accord with the laws of war. And if the rule is that we can never kill any of these people, because that is "assassination"; some of them will probably succeed in carrying out attacks. We could simply call off the whole war, and maybe become pacifists, but I myself am not willing to do all the things pacifists want us to do.
by Aaron Carine on Mon, 02/10/2014 - 5:11pm