The online edition of Foreign Affairs offers 5 free reads a month, not just one. No one need imagine what the article is like.

 While posting an article and highly recommending it is in a sense "coaxing" people to read it, I would not coax anyone to offer an opinion on what it says.  That is obviously anyone's choice and one to be respected but I would appreciate anyone who has if fact actually read the article to acknowledge that one fact just to satisfy my curiosity.  I admit that I am especially curious regarding those who do take time to comment with innuendo about the source and only seem to be suggesting reasons not to read the article.  

I have not read at FA enough to describe it as a publication one way or another but Doctorow thinks he has and offers this opinion that the article by English is outside the norm for that publication. 

Yet, it is one thing to have a courageous author and knowledgeable scholar. It is quite another to find a publisher willing to take the heat for presenting views that venture outside the mainstream Establishment. In that sense, it is stunning that Foreign Affairs chose to publish English and let him destroy the groupthink that has dominated the magazine and the elite foreign policy circles for years.