MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Here is what one does know about Raymond Davis. He is a staff member of the US consulate in Lahore, shot dead two Pakistani men last Thursday in a crowded part of Lahore (Mozang Chowk); according to him in self-defence. A vehicle of the US consulate rushed to Mr Davis’ ‘rescue’ ran over a third person, who also died. A murder case was registered against Raymond Davis, who was handed into police custody. A case has also been registered against the driver of the US consulate vehicle that ran over a third person, but the driver has yet to be apprehended.
After a fair deal of scrambling by both US and Pakistani officials on what to do or say, their positions have now started becoming clear and they have taken the stance that is usually taken in such cases: the US is asking that Raymond Davis, as a diplomatic functionary, should be handed back to them; Pakistan seems to be responding that the matter is sub judice and that the law should take its course.
Beyond that, there are more questions than answers. For most part, these questions fall into three categories: (1) Who is Raymond Davis? (2) What exactly happened at Mozang, Lahore? (3) What should happen now?
Comments
Not giving up:
by artappraiser on Mon, 02/07/2011 - 11:54pm
The Times of India is claiming the victims were I.S.I. Coming from them, I'd take that with a grain of salt, because their sources are just a prejudiced as Pakistani sources with this kind of thing, though it could be correct. The article does get the "curioser and curioser" part right, that's for sure:
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/08/2011 - 12:14am
Mystery Over Detained American Angers Pakistan
By JANE PERLEZ;
Ismail Khan contributed reporting from Peshawar, Pakistan, Waqar Gillani from Lahore, and Eric Schmitt from Washington, New York Times, February 8, 2011
Two things from the above....
The U.S. really really is not willing to let this go, for whatever reason:
They dug up some answers to the question "who is Raymond Davis?":
The article also goes over the various versions of "what happened at Mozang?" including things like the post mortem of bullets in the backs of both victims.
by artappraiser on Tue, 02/08/2011 - 11:53pm
The mystery explained to my satisfaction: basically he's a big cheese who knows a lot of stuff and the U.S. leaving him there with a public trial means the ISI, which can't even be trusted by the Pakistani government, could get access to what he knows. Already a lot of his Pakistani and Afghani contacts have suffered a lot of collateral damage from this, as have a lot of U.S. ops which had to be suspended. There's been direct involved by Obama himself, he's that important.. See:
Spy Games, What's really at stake in the Raymond Davis case.
by Scott Horton, March 11 @
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/03/11/spy_games
by artappraiser on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 6:51am
Fascinating link, ArtA. Worth putting up in the 'in the news' section, imo. I knew the CIA had started using contractors for drone related intelligence, but it's interesting to see that Blackwater operatives (okay - ex-Xe 'independent' contractors) are actually running the show, as acting station chief in Peshawar, probably the most important station the CIA has anywhere in the world. The CIA has basically outsourced the whole Afpak drone war, their most sensitive operation anywhere.
Sounds nuts to me.
by Obey on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 8:45am
Jeremy Scahill has been saying the same thing forever, and like him, I wonder to whom that Dark Army answers (CIA/JOSC/Blackwater-y Cretins). Cheney and friends?
Former ISI General: ""They have disproportionately large muscles and small brains, and draw weapons and shoot people for little or no reason."
Sounds about right. Congress doesn't really want to know what's up with it all; the hearings they've held make that pretty clear. After one invesitgation it was announced that Prince's boys could load the bombs on drones, but not guide them. Whew; we felt better ...
Scary Biscuits. It's a mad world.
by we are stardust on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:09am
From that FP article, it looks like Davis has single-handedly turned a cold cooperation with the ISI into an outright war between spy services and raising Pakistani public rage against the US up another notch.
Why is it always Blackwater that is involved in the worst fuckups in the region? It's almost as if it would be good for business if the war escalates out of control..
Oh right, it really would.
mmm, private-sector profit motive is always so efficiency-enhancing in spyfare, isn't it?
by Obey on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:30am
Am I utterly naive in thinking that there must be some over-arching political/strategic agenda alongside the profit, though? Some mix: civil war North/South Pakistan, kasmir, India, nukes...oh yeah; bases, embassies, all that...being constructed by the US in Pakistan.
Jim White at myFDL had been asking why in the world Darrell Issa's Codel was in Pakistan (allegedly on a 'trade mission') asking for Davis's release. (good video, too)
http://my.firedoglake.com/jimwhite/2011/02/01/why-is-darrell-issa-in-pakistan-asking-president-pm-for-release-of-raymond-davis/
And remember when the Guardian broke the news that oh, yeah; the US just admitted he was a CIA spy? Ha!
Oh, and Obey; a dagblog friend just sent me Client 9 about Eliot Ness Spitzer; looks great (the asshat hadda go and...ya know...) cut himself off at the feet.
by we are stardust on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 10:14am
Oh don't talk to me about Spitzer. I want to punch the guy in the face every time I think about him. The one man the country needed so desperately in the aftermath of the financial crisis, and he has to ruin it all... argh.
That, and for some bizarre reason, my girlfriend thinks he's hot (seriously, wtf?!?!)
Don't think the theory you're outlining counts as 'naive'. In any case I was just explaining the incompetence illustrated in the Davis case on the CIA outsourcing to lunkheads like Xe. Beyond that, sure, different people in the administration have different overarching aims in the region, some more dangerous than others. Is there any official or unofficial policy along those lines? I don't see any policy in the region, just random reactive moves based on nothing much at all.
by Obey on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 10:37am
Worth putting up in the 'in the news' section, imo
I dunno, I'm kind of happy with the discussion results right here on this "hidden" thread. All goes to show ya, sometimes bigger audiences aren't better audiences.
And to Donal, thanks for putting the further updates you found below....
by artappraiser on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 4:48pm
by Donal on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:10am
by Donal on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 9:13am