MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
"AMY GOODMAN: Civil liberties advocates are raising alarm over news that the FBI is giving agents more leeway to conduct domestic surveillance. According to the New York Times, new guidelines will allow FBI agents to investigate people and organizations "proactively" without firm evidence for suspecting criminal activity. The new rules will free up agents to infiltrate organizations, search household trash, use surveillance teams, search databases, conduct lie detector tests, even without suspicion of any wrongdoing.
"Some of the most notable changes apply to the lowest category of investigations, called an “assessment.” The category, created in December 2008, allows agents to look into people and organizations “proactively” and without firm evidence for suspecting criminal or terrorist activity.
Under current rules, agents must open such an inquiry before they can search for information about a person in a commercial or law enforcement database. Under the new rules, agents will be allowed to search such databases without making a record about their decision.
The new rules will also relax a restriction on administering lie-detector tests and searching people’s trash. Under current rules, agents cannot use such techniques until they open a “preliminary investigation,” which — unlike an assessment — requires a factual basis for suspecting someone of wrongdoing. But soon agents will be allowed to use those techniques for one kind of assessment, too: when they are evaluating a target as a potential informant.
Agents have asked for that power in part because they want the ability to use information found in a subject’s trash to put pressure on that person to assist the government in the investigation of others. But Ms. Caproni said information gathered that way could also be useful for other reasons, like determining whether the subject might pose a threat to agents."
No evidence needed, no file opened, lie detector tests okey-dokey, and search your trash to get the goods on you to pressure you into turning Rat on ???
Hi, Fibbies! How R ya?
Comments
Nobody gives a fuck fuck, Stardust.
Seriously. There are days when it just seems to me that nobody gives a fuck.
It's as though it doesn't matter what Obama and the Administration does, people feel completely disempowered to challenge it. A batch of the usual suspects just shit their pants whenever an issue like this is raised, and start babbling on about how the Republicans are all crazy, so in a sense, it must make sense, and America's a conservative country doncha know, and you can't win any other way on any possible issue, so just suck it up. And sure, the Republicans ARE crazy. But this sortof stuff is an issue nobody even fucking KNOWS about, and we're moving their way.
It's as though OUR guys have completely given way on the arguments they put forward in public... And OUR guys have stopped trying to rollback their insane lawbreaking tools and have instead decided to expand them... And so THAT'S the set-up that OUR guys are gonna hand over to the lunatics when they (inevitably) arrive.
* We don't argue for jobs anymore, we argue against spending.
* We don't argue against war anymore, we argue they aren't wars.
* We don't argue that we won the War on Terror, we argue that we need to see your garbage, mister.
* We don't argue that the rich are selling the country, its wealth and its citizenry down the river, we argue that we can do a better job of protecting the rich than the Republicans can.
What cowards our leaders have turned out to be.
Anyway, fear not. Somebody will be along soon to tell you why it's politically necessary, or not that bad compared to what might have been, or how it doesn't justify being angry at Obama, or why your betrayal will inevitably lead to the nation's doom.
I repeat. What cowards.
And shame on us for giving this preppy trash any sort of political cover.
by quinn esq on Thu, 06/16/2011 - 12:23am
Very few care, but hopefully it's an important few who will keep bearing witness, and maybe let others see what's happening. I often hear this song in my head these days, and while the exact events are a bit different now, the main themes ring true, I think. In the end, it's my belief that the silent Dems who are afraid to criticize this administration are 'the greatest single weapon working against the US'. Which makes the conversations about a possible Romney win creating a situation in which Dems really might want to fight back loud and clear, though it sure ain't a given.
It is insanely frustrating to be instructed here in such calm and left-brain only terms how we are truly a centrist nation, which meaning has long ago evaporated, I think. Sometimes I try to imagine why so many here go bat-shit crazy over Glenn Greenwald and Chomsky and god knows which others, and all I can think is that they sincerely have to deflect the truths they bring to the discussions. If a person can only psychically allow X amount of small criticisms of Obama or Dems, then it would follow that those who spotlight eggregious unConstitutional or depraved and indifferent acts are the messengers who should be shot.
You forgot that the same people who will be coming along to tell us those things will also say that if we've done nothing wrong, we don't have to worry. And that is so incredibly unimaginative I can barely stand it. Haven't they been reading about how anyone who pushes back is targeted by the fbi and homeland security, get on no-fly and watch lists? Maybe they don't give a fig because they know they will always stay indoors and off the street and off the Washington Mall in safety, or ever write any diaries in opposition to the administration, thus find comfort in the knowledge that the other guys would be worse.
Your quip about the accusations that 'your betrayal will inevitably lead to the nation's doom': it was only yesterday when Cho connected the dots for us that I even realized how much it got under the skin of some here that DanK and I have decided we can't vote for Obama; I can't get my mind around what force that seems to have. Likewise, in a way, when kgb asserted I'd been arguing full-throatedly against this WAR IN LIBYA, I couldn't even remember doing so, though he must have been right; too much of the early stuff just didn't smell right,,,once again.
Anyway, I'm glad as hell you care, and a few others here, and many Fair Witnesses and journalists and bloggers out in the world. And yep, I include Amy and Sy Hersh and even Marcy Wheeler and the other favorite target here: Jane Hamsher. She wrote from the courthouse yesterday where she'd accompanied Manning's friend David House for his appearance before the grand jury, and they ran into a friend of freaking Lyndie England, who appearing before a different GJ. She and Dan Choi asked the friend to get get a coffee with them, probably to find whassup with that, and the guards prevented them leaving the courthouse. "These are wikileaks people" the guards said, and it wasn't until an FBI agent came that the friend was permitted to leave, but not Jane and Dan with her/him (I've forgotten which). This nation is getting so fucked. All must be controlled.
Anyway, to me, it's 'Seven O'clock News, Silent Night'. In spades. Not to pile more on, dear. ;o)
by we are stardust on Thu, 06/16/2011 - 8:33am