The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age
    jollyroger's picture

    State of Siege

    Emergencies can be national in scope and existential in impact (like the Civil War, which prompted Lincoln to take emergency measures including suspending Habeas Corpus (parenthetically, now that Bill Clinton has eviscerated The Great Writ, no one would bother to formally suspend its operation), or geographically and temporally limited, if profound in impact (Katrina).

    They have several characteristics common to all, however.

    They are within the discretion of the appropriate executive to declare. (eg, a governor or ....a President).

    They suspend the normal operation of political and police power.

    They bring into primacy on a national level, one agency: FEMA.

    *Historically, the left has sounded the tocsin of alarm when FEMA's supravening role has been bruited as the solution to some long festering social alienation.

    That said, and conceding that I have in the past made extravagant suggestions vis-a-vis Presidential use of FEMA as a vehicle to carry forward policies sure to be thwarted by his political enemies, are we not in an unemployment emergency?

    And does not our decaying infrastructure pose an immanent threat of death or injury to multitudes of innocent Americans, the impact of which were it the objective of a terrorist threat would certainly be widely seen as justifying, nay demanding, vigorous, even strenuous executive action?

    Put differently, given a President willing to reach out and snuff anyone, citizen or not, in an extrajudicial killing via predator hellfire missile, one willing to defy existing law on the use of war powers, why cavil at a little domestic over reaching to save the economy?

    Argue, then, if you will, why President Obama should not, in his upcoming jobs  speech, declare an infrastructure emergency requiring that FEMA take over all state highway and building functions, with concommitant firing up the printing press to permit nationalization of the state highway budgets, and wholesale hiring of the unemployed to avert the undeniable danger of bridge collapse, pothole vehicle swallowing, and levy failure.  The House will impeach, you say?  Big deal, sez I--the Senate will not convict.

    Go long, Prez, go long.  What have you got to lose?

     

    * the FBI “continued to evade the will of Congress, partly with Justice Department approval, by maintaining a secret administrative index of suspects for round-up in case of a national emergency.” The FBI will maintian control of the list until 1985, when it will be transferred to FEMA

    *

    Comments

    Don't hold your breath about the President going long; his masters haven't given him permission.

    If he does say something at all, it's just to get your vote, he has no intention of delivering.  

    Change you can believe in sounded good.

    When the doctor says theres been a change in your lung x-rays, the cancer has spread.

    Change you can believe in?

    Talk the talk, all hat no cowboy, puts his mouth where the money is. Not much change there.   

    We saw the Arab spring, and were watching the American fall.


    Trust me, I expect nothing bold from Obama. But why accrue dictatoroal powers only for evil?

    Spoken like a man who has never watched Pinky and the Brain.


    We're on our way to fame, fortune and a world that's a better place for all....

     

    But seriously, when it comes to killin' Prez ain't shy...why not mobilize those go it alone tendencies to fill in some potholes?

     

    The consensus seems to be, in any case, that he can't come with his usual bullshit platitudes and difference splitting after the huge buildup to this speech--but, of course, we've hear that before.