MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
![]() |
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
David Remnick, The New Yorker, today
Laurence H. Tribe, a leading constitutional-law scholar and Obama’s mentor at Harvard, told me after Wednesday night’s debate with Mitt Romney, “Although I would have been happier with a more aggressive debate performance by the President, I’ve had to remind myself that Barack Obama’s instincts and talents have never included going for an opponent’s jugular. That’s just not who he is or ever has been.”
............
Will Burns, a Chicago alderman, who, as a student, worked for Obama in his (successful) 1996 campaign for the Illinois State Senate and his (unsuccessful) 2000 campaign for Congress, said that the format was too “loosey-goosey” for Obama, who failed to get aggressive with Romney.
“The President has always been someone who takes the truth seriously and has a great faith in the American people and their ability to handle big ideas,” Burns said. “He doesn’t patronize them. He uses the campaign as an educative process. He wants to win but also wants to be clear about his ideas…. He took complex ideas like Medicare and the debt and tried to explain it to people so they can understand them while at the same time not being patronizing. And he is doing this with an opponent who is completely dissembling on every issue! There is a certain brazenness about Romney. It’s like [Stephen] Colbert talking about ‘truthiness.’ Romney stood there, with his hair and his jaw and his terrific angles—and he lied! About taxes, about Medicare. Obama pushed back on the five-trillion-dollar tax cut or the way Romney’s version of Medicare would destroy Medicare as we know it. And Romney just tilted his head and said, Oh, no, it won’t. At some point, you have to believe that the facts speak for themselves.”
....
The intra-Palestinian meeting in Moscow has precedent
— Hanna Notte (@HannaNotte) February 29, 2024
Russia's hosted such meetings in the past, most recently Feb 2019
Russia has long lamented the US' "monopolization" of the peace process & tried to carve out a niche for itself: mediating among the disunited Palestinians/2
Here's what I told them: https://halginsberg.com/vote-for-jill-stein-again/
Controversial Brazil law curbing Indigenous rights comes into force https://t.co/pCoDg05irX
— Gareth Harris (@garethharr) December 28, 2023
Location: U.S. Embassy and residential compounds
Events: Heavy gunfire is occuring around the area of the U.S. Embassy and residential compounds adjacent to the Trutier area of Tabarre. All Embassy personnel have been instructed to remain indoors and shelter-in-place until further notice. All others should avoid the area.
Actions to take:
- Avoid the area;
- Avoid demonstrations and any large gatherings of people;
- Do not attempt to drive through roadblocks; and
- If you encounter a roadblock, turn around and get to a safe area.
By The Editorial Board @ Bloomberg.com, December 8, 2023
A mass expulsion of Afghan migrants could destabilize the region and fuel radicalization. The West should pressure Islamabad to change course.
All eyes on #Chad right now
Chad has two internet trunks coming into the country: One from the Red Sea via Sudan; the other from Cameroon. Not possible for the totality of the country's internet network to be shut unless done centrally. A lot of rumors swirling; few facts. https://t.co/N6bDJZ2ixO
BREAKING: Three loss prevention employees in Macy’s across the street from Philadelphia City Hall stabbed, one of them has died from stab wounds, @PhillyPolice sources tell me. Police converged on the store as the three workers were rushed to Jefferson Hospital. pic.twitter.com/4U1eKycL4W
Former US Ambassador Arrested, Charged With Working As Secret Agent For Cuba https://t.co/LDwo4ZJI1K
— HuffPost (@HuffPost) December 4, 2023
[Chapter I news is HERE, Oct. 7 til today]
You don’t get it.
— George Deek (@GeorgeDeek) December 2, 2023
It’s not about an UNRWA teacher who held an Israeli kid hostage in his house.
It’s all about how for 75 years you have destroyed the future of generations of Palestinians, including my family.
My cousins in Arab countries are still not citizens - not even the… https://t.co/nv6anubGhc
Note 'Community Notes' attached to UNWRA's statement.
Imperialism for me but not for thee?
It's wild that Venezuela is now holding a vote on whether 2/3 of Guyana actually belongs to them! Analysts suggest that Modoru may want military action to pump up his sinking popularity.
Could we have a war in South America?!?
"The people who live in Essequibo are largely… pic.twitter.com/QvMEjkkgwy
The lack of a cohesive delegation has allowed attention-seeking lawmakers to act on their own.
McCarthy: “You have [Rep. Matt] Gaetz, who belongs in jail…”
Gaetz: “Tough words from a guy who sucker punches people in the back. The only assault I committed was against Kevin’s fragile ego.”https://t.co/LctPuz6Pcf
By Martinn Pengelly in Washington DC for TheGuardian.com, Nov. 30
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells Ryan Grim life in Congress ‘completely transformed’ after Democratic leader stepped down
"Both the AU and the intl community place more weight on whether elections are held than whether they are free and fair. Sanctions/expulsions occur when there is a coup but not necessarily when elections are rigged or if an “institutional coup” occurs." https://t.co/m9dNimJP0D
— Cameron Hudson (@_hudsonc) November 28, 2023
Copyright © 2018 dagblog. All rights reserved.
Comments
Interesting, thank you. Confirms for me, along with the other things I've been reading since the debate what I always suspected--he doesn't like hard Q & A where questions are a surprise and debates and isn't good at it unless he practices real hard (or has recently been thinking on topic.) No impromptu for him unless he knows what he'll be speaking on or has just been working on it. He likes to have time to think first. Hence, speeches are his preferred mode, if an interview, it is soft one-on-one and the type of questions are okayed.
The evidence is actually quite significant combined with the above article--presidential historian Martha Kumar has been watching him, tallying him, comparing his approach on this to other presidents. Now that he's been in his bubble, he has pretty much made sure he doesn't have to do hard Q & A, and is totally out of practice (Can't think of the last time I've seen a picture or video of him taking a question from a citizen he just shakes hands, and says hello, and I am recalling complaints from world leaders and Congresspersons that are applicable too..)
I can't find the first article I saw on this in the last day, which really lay out the numbers most strikingly, but here is Dana Milbank @ WaPo with similar:
There's more here from a McClatchy reporter:
http://www.kansas.com/2012/10/04/2515289/obama-debate-stumble-might-stem...
and in the same vein from Michael Calderone at HuffPo:
http://www.kansas.com/2012/10/04/2515289/obama-debate-stumble-might-stem...
Reminds me of how when he was inaugurated people were looking forward to lots of JFK-style press conferences with witty repartee and I was thinking: I don't know, that doesn't sound quite right, not like him.. And now I realize he's really gotten a break about lack of press conferences, how many have I seen? If he was a GOP president the media would be complaining a lot more, maybe it would have been better for him now if they had..
Suffice it to say, I am pretty convinced that he's not that great at this, pretty sure of just the opposite, and I hope he is finding the time to practice. It's not just about winning, as he probably still will win, but his appearances in the next two will affect his general population support in his second term. Especially with the huge number of viewers the first one got.
by artappraiser on Fri, 10/05/2012 - 3:59pm
And thank you for this link.
One of my reactions to the Remnick piece was that, for those anticipating that Obama will be more aggressive in the next debate, this information would seem to suggest either he will try to develop some pre-planned, sharper-edged remarks he thinks he'll have an opening to insert based on what is known about the debate topics, or he will conclude, if the poll results don't show Romney gaining any ground after the first debate, that he is best off sticking to his preferred style and approach to this format instead of trying to get out of his comfort zone.
Very difficult to develop in advance remarks going after Romney when one has absolutely no idea what he is going to say. He clearly has no problem departing entirely from what he has said earlier. And he has no problem offering a "program" which stands in any discernible relationship to reality, as in reality on the planet earth in the galaxy Milky Way, now. Basically, he'll say anything.
Part of what I thought I was watching was a conclusion by the Romney camp that if they were going to deceive and demagogue, they might as well go all-out and throw the kitchen sink at Obama with the hope of flustering or overwhelming him. (They may very well also have done homework on him yielding insights contained in the Remnick article and I would assume that they took a close look at his 2008 debate tapes to see what they could learn from those.) Thus, to take just a few examples from the other night, the viewer is supposed to believe all of the following coming from Romney about a hypothetical Romney Administration:
So where does one even start with such a Molitov cocktail of incoherence and deception?
I know that when I engage another person on some matter, if what they are asserting is false or wildly off base on many, many grounds, I find it difficult to know "where to start" in responding.
The Romney camp has already said they don't intend to be constrained by fact-checkers. One of my other reactions to the other night was that, given that the Governor appears to have no sense of shame or embarrassment about what comes out of his mouth, we may find out a bit more about whether, as some maintain, we really do live in a post-truth or post-fact age.
I can grant that the debate format is not one Obama is particularly well suited for, at least in the way debate performances seem to be currently judged (although whether a "loss" hurts him in the polls is a distinct question), while also saying that it's that much more difficult for him--or anyone--when up against an opponent who will say anything like Romney did the other night.
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 10/05/2012 - 4:57pm
Saw this on the body language at the debate this morning. How much of it is objective observation and how much is just spnning. FWIW:
by EmmaZahn on Fri, 10/05/2012 - 4:32pm
Rick Hertzberg's take is online at The New Yorker's website: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/15/121015taco_talk_hertzberg
Nothing he wrote will come as a surprise to anyone here. My favorite excerpt, for its clarity, brevity, and therefore aptness of use going forward. for the duration, by those who want him to win:
Also this interesting thought:
What I am more inclined to do in interactions with others from here on out is to do exactly what Hertzberg says Democrats cannot do, and credibly portray Romney as an extremist, using his own words to hang him. When he denies his extreme, suddenly inconvenient ones, then the issue becomes one of the Governor's secretive and wildly dishonest campaign (even for a politician), reinforced by his continuing unwillingness to release at least 8 more of his tax returns as well as by his chronic duplicity.
by AmericanDreamer on Tue, 10/09/2012 - 12:05pm