MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Predicting the outcome of the Kerry effort is a pointless exercise. My own analysis on the peace process has been annoyingly negative not because of ideology, bias, or career change. My sober assessment flows from my agreement with one of America's preeminent philosophers, Groucho Marx (or Harpo) in Duck Soup: Who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes? I see what I see; and it's pretty tough to persuade me that a conflict-ending accord on all the big issues, including Jerusalem and refugees, is possible now.
That doesn't mean that agreement on borders and security isn't leading to provisional Palestinian statehood with commitments to negotiate the rest. But even that will take a heroic effort on the part of leaders who are more risk-averse politicians than great leaders. Can they do it anyway if pushed and supported by Kerry and Obama? We'll find out soon enough.
Comments
Refreshingly optimistic piece (There will be peace between Israel and Palestine) by Haaretz columnist Bradley Burston:
Amen to that. Happy weekend.
by Bruce Levine on Fri, 07/26/2013 - 5:52pm
It's a go, starting Monday night & Tues. in Washington D.C.:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2013/07/20137282018946229.html
by artappraiser on Sun, 07/28/2013 - 9:23pm
Here's an interesting background article on Israeli-Palestinian talks, including Sharon's role in speaking "Likudish" while backing out of Gaza - something like "retreat softly while carrying a big stick" or "know your audience and what inspires them".
I'm very skeptical that Bibi can be a Sharon, but would love to be pleasantly surprised.
I'm most worried that with Egypt's significant turn against Hamas/Palestine and the marginalization of Fatah in representing the new generation, that any bargaining at this point will be simply to humiliate Palestinians - and that in Obama fashion, we'll be looking for a deal to call a deal, however shitty - or preferably shitty to show it's "fair"- so we get the t-shirt and press conference but leave everyone grumbling for 2 or more decades. Curiously it seems Israel's now both more intransigent but supportive of a 2-state solution, including part of East Jurasalem. But it won't take much (pro-settler?) meddling to turn the West Bank into a rather unliveable apportionment of tracts of land rather than a real defined territory to base a fledgling nation in.
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 07/29/2013 - 3:06am
A tidbit regarding background. Lord Caradon, one of the authors of Resolution 242, said that it didn't require a full return to the 1967 borders(or, if you prefer, "armistice lines"). He also said that changes to the boundaries had to be agreed upon by both sides, which rules out the unilateral expansion envisioned by Meier, Begin, and Shamir.
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=118&x_article=1267
Some may say that CAMERA isn't reliable, but they give a full quotation of Caradon's words. I couldn't access the interview from the online Journal of Palestine Studies.
by Aaron Carine on Mon, 07/29/2013 - 2:19pm