MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Funny all that fervor and fulmination... well, almost funny. RIP Hillary, death by a 1000 lies and misquotes.
Comments
Stream of consciousness from the headline @ the link....
Basically says it all about not just coal but the whole factory town thing and a local region going kaput when they disappear.
Jobs, jobs, jobs...reality: small business does not offer old timey type stable jobs and international if not global companies are the big employers. We are in the middle of a nationalistic and xenophobic counterreaction worldwide that thinks that this can be reversed. Fat chance unless there's a zombie apocalypse. Those who have watched Walking Dead know that might not be much fun if it happened.
The march of progress is scary, I am surprised to find myself not too happy about it at my age, all my knowledge and life experience seems obsolete and useless sometimes. But adopting conservatism in response is trying to live in denial of what's going on. That's not even an option for me.
I understand even better now why I was always disturbed by things like the efforts of the French to maintain their culture. "Conserving the old ways" doesn't work.
by artappraiser on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 2:20pm
I remember Bowles' intro to The Spider's House, where he was talking about preserving old Morocco in the post-war days, with the ironical twist that it was the colonialists that wanted to preserve that beauty, that the Moroccan people themselves wanted to charge headlong into modernity.
It's not quite the same thing, but I want to keep a pulse on this change. I too feel obsolete - I read recently how Janis Joplin had groomed herself as an artist, not just a singer, with all the obligatory books and poetry and style and what-not. I suppose I too got trapped in this self-image but on an even wider scale (and of course much less a success), and now I see the fanciful future pared down into a bunch of gadgets, a simplistic view of reality/philosophy, and an amazing loss of security & certainty & time for beauty even as the world becomes less complex & time-consuming. But then specializing holds no special allure, since anything you specialize in can be wiped out in 5 years, and then you "retrain", a rather flippant and pompous term I'll be coming back to more and more. I wonder what Stravinsky would have retrained as if classical had fallen out of vogue in 1910 rather than later.
I've spent much of the day reading Michael's "Unreasonable Men" to which I"ll have more to say, but I'm relieved to see LaFollette come out much less the firebrand and more the strategic but grounded thinker. There's a profound shift to come & it won't be a soft landing - it'll be faster than Uber or United fall out of favor, and despite all the attempts to lather the "revolution" with the laundry list of causes & correct values gathered from the last 60-70 years, I'm assuming it'll be taken away by someone who knows better to address the crux of the matter, to provide real but fast-moving solutions, to better appreciate the tiny nuances of all the future change the last decade & what that means for our comportment and survival and well-being. Not a huge treatise, but a few core issues from which the rest can derive.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 2:44pm
Aside: Another Paul & Jane Bowles fan here---great cross cultural stuff with internationalist vs. local memes everywhere, not to mention intellectual vs. sensual....really thought provoking
by artappraiser on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 2:55pm
While his novels are good, some of his short stories (Collected Stories 1939-1976) are simply amazing. Oddly I can't remember finishing Two Serious Ladies - I recall dipping into it -(nice coverage here), but I feel her in most everything Paul does and a most intriguing figure of the time.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 3:51pm
Jane's life is part of her "work", kind of like a performance artist, if you liked the New Yorker article and haven't read this: A Little Original Sin: The Life and Work of Jane Bowles you should. One of my favorite reads of all times.
by artappraiser on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 5:35pm
Somewhat agree, though after a while this "women's life is their work" starts to become trite, like they go to the right parties and wear the right clothes and have the right affairs... I'm reminded of the Diane Keaton part in Reds, where she's kind of a hanger-on in the center of a global revolution still debating with herself each morning what she should write each day and feeling unappreciated. It's a bit different with Jane because she was pushing the boundaries of her time quite a bit plus I see her as part of Paul's creative effort, a kind of teamwork where his works would be much more 1-dimensional. To some extent he's painting her into his paintings and taking away the number of paintings she might paint. It's not exploitive - she's fully ensconced in it, and maybe 2 Serious Ladies is the only book she really needed to write, "successful" or not, but it's still curious to me.
There's an interesting Edie Sedgwick-like character in The Recognitions who somewhat exemplifies this whole dynamic.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 4:29am
Yes but it's a little different when your avant garde life includes an addictive lesbian relationship with a butch uneducated Moroccan woman and a homosexual husband. There weren't any dominant parties involved except Cherifa, a female, if you could call her that. The "work" is actually the team of Paul and Jane and the "extended family" of visitors, and their reaction to life. The writing is just an expression of it.
Edie Sedgwick is another fascination of mine but I don't necessarily agree with the comparison. She is definitely waifdom writ large.
(Way to go on the two of us doing a thread hijacking, apologies to everyone else!)
by artappraiser on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 6:42am
It's my thread, I can do what I like. Flame on.
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 12:17pm
Wondering how a more staid, intellectual Didion-Dunne marriage/partnership stacks up to Jane & Paul, and how Salinger got away with making homosexuality shocking in 1956 what with the common-day antics of Cole Porter & Gertrude Stein up through Jane Bowles & Carson McCullers (perhaps it's lesbians don't matter in consequence, it's when boys do it, bees do it, even little bitty trees do it...)
by PeraclesPlease on Mon, 04/17/2017 - 6:54am
They must need to search to find these specially retarded journalists to write this kind of BS comparison that doesn't explain anything.
The coal miner jobs are high skilled high pay positions earning these workers two to three times .what a service sector employee earns. Their total numbers aren't high because the industry has been heavily mechanized but their productivity for the economy is huge. Turn on your light switch and you are probably using at least some of their product.
We don't export Arby's product but we do export 60 million short tons of coal annually helping somewhat with our trade imbalance. I read that the industry is investing heavily in carbon capture research, now that Trump is promoting coal, which if possible would make coal very attractive. PP's magic solar battery may be something other than, too good to be true, but the race is on for cleaner energy.
by Peter (not verified) on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 3:58pm
Well, Trump better work quick - I know what a salto mortale looks like, & the one below's pretty convincing.
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 4:53pm
and then there's this
hence some of the few jobs left might be well-paying because: they're high tech, not manual labor
by artappraiser on Sat, 04/15/2017 - 5:16pm
These are still working class jobs and coal mining is still mining not clean-room tech. There is still underground coal mining that pays very well while much of the western coal is strip mined with equipment operators and mechanics using and maintaining the equipment.
I doubt that coal miners or operating engineers need the bloviators from Brookings to inform then about the challenges facing their industry, they have been living through them. They certainly don't need politicians such as the Red Queen targeting working class people's livelihood for gleeful destruction while selling their friend's snake-oil green agenda. This is why Trump showed support for these working people who are under attack from political parasites and he has done what he could. Throwing out Obama's so called Clean Power Plan will help but there is not much that can be done about falling foreign demand for US coal.
The throwaway line in the Brookings spiel about these miners easily transitioning to the green workforce shows either ignorance or arrogance or probably both. Workers who earned $30/hr mining are supposed to transition to the Gypsies lifestyle and follow the sun for about $9/hr
by Peter (not verified) on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 10:22am
Wyoming has taken over the majority of production because the costs are much less and it's a lot more straightforward than the heroic and deadly Appalachian mining of yore.
Appalachia has only 37,000 coal jobs - 15,000 in W.Va, 10k in Ky, 6600 in PA. How many in Wyoming to provide 42% of output? Also 6600. 1/4 the workers for almost twice the output of the Appalachians. They cover this kind of math in 5th grade.
I know you hate the "Red Queen", but her jobs as NY senator and Secretary of State had little to do with coal, and she's been out of office over 4 years now. Maybe it's time to find a more relevant bête noire.
And I get where you're coming from with clean energy - that's all for pussies. Real men can handle black lung and emphysema. In my day kids could even work the mines - no more.. It's like those damn anti-smokers - they're ruining our heritage.
BTW, from Yale Environment 360:
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 11:35am
I was refering to the Red Queen's campaign promise to shut them down and put coal miners out of work while promoting foreign imports of solar panels made in China with electricity from some of the worst polluting coal plants in the world. This is the kind of brainfarts you get from political parasites that will make some people very wealthy while destroying hard working people's jobs but producing little or no cleaner energy.
This is where it is evident what the Clintonites think of working class people and because of the miners falling numbers can dismiss them as unimportant. With manufacturing jobs already decimated in the US the spread of automation is much more threatening to the professional and managerial class workers and white collar in general. Expert programs wil make many otf these people join the wandering solar panel crews for burger-flipper wages.
by Peter (not verified) on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 12:49pm
by PeraclesPlease on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 1:17pm
Thank you so much for repeating this. I am so sorry that no one else bothers. Peter seems a bit lazy, or just ideologicallly dishonest. One or the other.
And then:
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/11/12/clinton-pl...
Beyond irritating
by CVille Dem on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 3:44pm
Luckily for all of us these people could easily seperate the promise of jobs destruction from the phony promise of a rescue package. She may have claimed to not want to forget these people but neoliberal democrats are practiced at deciet.
by Peter (not verified) on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 7:37pm
Peter, you don't usually have so many misspellings in 2 sentences. Are you a little wasted? I'd like to think so anyway.
by CVille Dem on Sun, 04/16/2017 - 11:57pm
Edit to add a good piece from a few weeks ago:
by artappraiser on Wed, 04/19/2017 - 4:11pm
Coal miners should not be surprised by this.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 04/19/2017 - 4:24pm